Adam Posted December 24, 2005 Share Posted December 24, 2005 I really think his overall play has been well this season for what is asked of a #4 WR. His last third down conversion was absolutely crucial in running the clock down on the last drive, and overall he played a heck of a game today. He's dropped the ball a few times this season, but nothing like the past few seasons. I think he's salvaged his career, and I hope we bring him back. I think he's a keeper Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cåblelady Posted December 24, 2005 Share Posted December 24, 2005 Go figure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jayg Posted December 24, 2005 Share Posted December 24, 2005 I really think his overall play has been well this season for what is asked of a #4 WR. His last third down conversion was absolutely crucial in running the clock down on the last drive, and overall he played a heck of a game today. He's dropped the ball a few times this season, but nothing like the past few seasons. I think he's salvaged his career, and I hope we bring him back. I think he's a keeper 541861[/snapback] Lee Evans also had a nice game after last week. All of the receivers played well today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tux of Borg Posted December 24, 2005 Share Posted December 24, 2005 Reed is playing like it's a contract year. Too bad i can't say the same for Clements. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seq004 Posted December 24, 2005 Share Posted December 24, 2005 I really think his overall play has been well this season for what is asked of a #4 WR. His last third down conversion was absolutely crucial in running the clock down on the last drive, and overall he played a heck of a game today. He's dropped the ball a few times this season, but nothing like the past few seasons. I think he's salvaged his career, and I hope we bring him back. I think he's a keeper 541861[/snapback] Yeah, that makes up for 3 years of not showing up on Sundays Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted December 24, 2005 Share Posted December 24, 2005 Yeah, that makes up for 3 years of not showing up on Sundays 541894[/snapback] Gee, that's not a little harsh. And wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted December 24, 2005 Author Share Posted December 24, 2005 Yeah, that makes up for 3 years of not showing up on Sundays 541894[/snapback] You can't get those three years back- let it go. He's playing as well as any #4 WR in football, and is well worth keeping, especially if we don't keep Moulds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seq004 Posted December 24, 2005 Share Posted December 24, 2005 You can't get those three years back- let it go. He's playing as well as any #4 WR in football, and is well worth keeping, especially if we don't keep Moulds. 541909[/snapback] What??? "You can't get those three years back-let it go." Hear I am thinking that players are evaluated each and EVERY YEAR that they are under contract. The guy had a decent rookie year and while he had some good games this year he's had some bad ones also. Trust me, he is not what the Bills thought they were getting when they drafted him in the second round in 2002. Also he's in a contract year which shows me he's just about the money. He will not be kept. I think Reed and the other great pick by TD that year will be shown the door and after TD opens it for Mike and Josh he'll walk threw it behind them! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sanjosebillsfan Posted December 24, 2005 Share Posted December 24, 2005 Its about time he did play well. Merry Christmas to all on the stadium wall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted December 24, 2005 Author Share Posted December 24, 2005 What??? "You can't get those three years back-let it go." Hear I am thinking that players are evaluated each and EVERY YEAR that they are under contract. The guy had a decent rookie year and while he had some good games this year he's had some bad ones also. Trust me, he is not what the Bills thought they were getting when they drafted him in the second round in 2002. Also he's in a contract year which shows me he's just about the money. He will not be kept. I think Reed and the other great pick by TD that year will be shown the door and after TD opens it for Mike and Josh he'll walk threw it behind them! 541918[/snapback] I have to disagree- he would not play as poorly as he has over the years by choice. I think he has found a role that suits him. I don't think anyone can question how hard he has played at all times. He is as good as any #4 WR in the NFL, and will be kept- I HAVE SPOKEN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wraith Posted December 24, 2005 Share Posted December 24, 2005 What??? "You can't get those three years back-let it go." Hear I am thinking that players are evaluated each and EVERY YEAR that they are under contract. The guy had a decent rookie year and while he had some good games this year he's had some bad ones also. Trust me, he is not what the Bills thought they were getting when they drafted him in the second round in 2002. Also he's in a contract year which shows me he's just about the money. He will not be kept. I think Reed and the other great pick by TD that year will be shown the door and after TD opens it for Mike and Josh he'll walk threw it behind them! 541918[/snapback] All about the money? Hahahaha. Everyone else is thinking it, i'll say it. You're an idiot. Merry Christmas. If he was all about the money, wouldn't you think he'd perform as best he could throughout his cheap rookie contract so that he can get a large contract when he hits free agency for the first time? You honestly think he dogged it that badly for the last few years then decided to turn it back on for the money? Think people, think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDG Posted December 24, 2005 Share Posted December 24, 2005 You can't get those three years back- let it go. He's playing as well as any #4 WR in football, and is well worth keeping, especially if we don't keep Moulds. 541909[/snapback] What's a #4 WR and where can I find out who the other #4 WRs in football are? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted December 24, 2005 Share Posted December 24, 2005 What's a #4 WR and where can I find out who the other #4 WRs in football are? 541932[/snapback] A #4 WR is the guy who plays #3 WR when your #3 WR is out. Or the #4 WR on four wide formations. You find out the #4 on each team by watching the games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDG Posted December 24, 2005 Share Posted December 24, 2005 A #4 WR is the guy who plays #3 WR when your #3 WR is out. Or the #4 WR on four wide formations. You find out the #4 on each team by watching the games. 541940[/snapback] So, Josh Reed is playing better than Tony Gonzalez and Jeremy Shockey (who are often lined up as WR in 4WR sets for their teams)? And does Josh Reed get credit for "best #4 WR" catches for all the catches he has made out of 2 and 3 WR sets this year? JDG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seq004 Posted December 24, 2005 Share Posted December 24, 2005 All about the money? Hahahaha. Everyone else is thinking it, i'll say it. You're an idiot. Merry Christmas. If he was all about the money, wouldn't you think he'd perform as best he could throughout his cheap rookie contract so that he can get a large contract when he hits free agency for the first time? You honestly think he dogged it that badly for the last few years then decided to turn it back on for the money? Think people, think. 541930[/snapback] What a complete fart of the brain. Let me think threw the years..Oh yeah their have been 1 or 2 players that tend to play better in their contract year. Yeah, I'm sure everyone on the board is thinking my post was stupid. Now take your 100 posts and get of the board imbecile. Last impressions seem to work well in the NFL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted December 24, 2005 Share Posted December 24, 2005 So, Josh Reed is playing better than Tony Gonzalez and Jeremy Shockey (who are often lined up as WR in 4WR sets for their teams)? And does Josh Reed get credit for "best #4 WR" catches for all the catches he has made out of 2 and 3 WR sets this year? JDG 541947[/snapback] The first is a just plain dumb analogy, and the second is yes, he does get credit for those catches even though he is the #4 WR, mainly because the #3 was hurt. The fact is, he's the fourth guy in our receiving corps, and Roscoe Parrish was not drafted in the second round to play back-up to Josh Reed, but rather to play the slot in passing formations, or at least be on the field in 3 WR sets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RunTheBall Posted December 24, 2005 Share Posted December 24, 2005 You can't get those three years back- let it go. He's playing as well as any #4 WR in football, and is well worth keeping, especially if we don't keep Moulds. 541909[/snapback] Ya that's where the answer for this team is, the #4 wideout spot. Glad we've got it covered with a second round draft pick bust. That's like saying Coy Wire is playing the backup gunner position on the punt return team as well as anyone in football. Excellent. RTB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted December 24, 2005 Author Share Posted December 24, 2005 Ya that's where the answer for this team is, the #4 wideout spot. Glad we've got it covered with a second round draft pick bust. That's like saying Coy Wire is playing the backup gunner position on the punt return team as well as anyone in football. Excellent. RTB 541964[/snapback] I'm not calling him the focal point on the offense- depth is important- and the 3rd and 4th WR's will have some important plays over the course of a season. If you dont have depth, the playmakers wont be able to do much Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rico Posted December 24, 2005 Share Posted December 24, 2005 Let's see what the $$$ is first. He sure helped his case today though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted December 24, 2005 Share Posted December 24, 2005 1 mil a year, tops. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts