T.E. Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago I enjoy how their owner is like "We know he sucks and that he is wildly unpopular with the fans, but we're paying him a lot of money and, by God, he's going to work for it!" 2 Quote
H2o Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Watson is washed. His arm is weaker than Sanders' at this point. This would increase our chances of victory imo, because he is bound to be absolutely dreadful. Quote
James Can Cook Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 1 minute ago, H2o said: Watson is washed. His arm is weaker than Sanders' at this point. This would increase our chances of victory imo, because he is bound to be absolutely dreadful. Considering he was banned from every massage parlor in the greater Cleveland area his arm may be stronger than you think! 1 9 1 Quote
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago No chance he plays this year. This is to just get him some reps. i will say that with or without him, that Cleveland game is going to end up as probably one of our hardest left on the schedule with their D. Probably will be a snow game too. 1 1 Quote
BuffaloBillyG Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago I'm so glad there may be a happy ending here 3 Quote
Kelly to Allen Posted 47 minutes ago Posted 47 minutes ago (edited) It was hilarious when the browns got rid of Baker for Watson because they wanted a " grown up" Unreal hubris/ bizarre evaluation Edited 47 minutes ago by Kelly to Allen Quote
Sierra Foothills Posted 25 minutes ago Posted 25 minutes ago This was inevitable and predictable. What's hilarious is that the Browns, possibly more than any franchise aside from the Jets, can't get the QB position right and now they have the two most divisive, controversial QBs in the NFL on the same roster. You can't make this stuff up. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.