Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Why not allow teams to dress and play all 53 players instead of just 48?  There is no difference in terms of cap or any other financial reasons. 
 

Color me confused. 🤔

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

i have wondered this too, considering the league is all about player safety and the union pretends to care about the players.

 

after they increased the PS i figured it'd be natural to allow at least 49 players to dress...cuz...ya know... think of the safety? less pressed to play banged up or injured players. lol

 

honestly, the union only cares about the vested players if they care at all and the league wants the best players on the field at all times to give the best perforance, even if it means injury becasue it adds drama to the story.

  • Like (+1) 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...