The foundation of the narrative, under the Charlie Kirk assassination, is starting to crack

[JaCrispy]

4 hours ago, JDHillFan said:

Valhalla VFT is on the case! Essentially the white, bearded, male, ex-military, heavily tattooed, roided-out version of Candace Owens. Sigh. 

No need to get so defensive…it’s just food for thought, and a topic for conversation…

 

Your ad hominem attacks against the guy really don’t seem warranted when all you have to do is say why you disagree…👍

 

 

Edited 13 hours ago by JaCrispy

[JDHillFan]

4 hours ago, JaCrispy said:

No need to get so defensive…it’s just food for thought, and a topic for conversation…

 

Your ad hominem attacks against the guy really don’t seem warranted when all you have to do is say why you disagree…👍

 

 

I can’t actually say that I disagree. I won’t invest my time listening to fringe lunatics like this goof and Candace Owens. If this is food for thought, it’s food tainted with botulism. 

[thenorthremembers]

1 hour ago, JDHillFan said:

I can’t actually say that I disagree. I won’t invest my time listening to fringe lunatics like this goof and Candace Owens. If this is food for thought, it’s food tainted with botulism. 

But you'll still spend your time commenting on it?

[JDHillFan]

12 minutes ago, thenorthremembers said:

But you'll still spend your time commenting on it?

Absolutely. That’s what this place allows for and it takes a micro-fraction of the time it does to listen to grifting psychos like Owens and her ilk. 

[Trump_is_Mentally_fit]

12 hours ago, Tenhigh said:

Never heard of him?  Why the weird need to lie just to neg a dead guy?

Why would I know who he is? I don't ingest right wing media 

 

Kind of arrogant to think I should know him just because you do  

1 hour ago, JDHillFan said:

Absolutely. That’s what this place allows for and it takes a micro-fraction of the time it does to listen to grifting psychos like Owens and her ilk. 

Is Trump a grifting psycho like Owens? 

[JDHillFan]

3 minutes ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said:

Is Trump a grifting psycho like Owens? 

This is the Charlie Kirk conspiracy thread. If there are any Trump threads out there and you want to ask the same question, I promise I will answer. Just tag me.

[Trump_is_Mentally_fit]

1 minute ago, JDHillFan said:

This is the Charlie Kirk conspiracy thread. If there are any Trump threads out there and you want to ask the same question, I promise I will answer. Just tag me.

So that's a no then, huh? 

 

Owens never said this bat sh it crazy stuff 

 

 

[JDHillFan]

2 minutes ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said:

So that's a no then, huh? 

 

Owens never said this bat sh it crazy stuff 

 

 

I think it’s fun that you’re standing up for Candace Owens by comparing her to Trump. A few days ago you said you yourself were following Trump’s lead. He truly is all powerful.
 

[Trump_is_Mentally_fit]

Just now, JDHillFan said:

I think it’s fun that you’re standing up for Candace Owens by comparing her to Trump. A few days ago you said you yourself were following Trump’s lead. He truly is all powerful.
 

What's really fun is seeing a MAGA guy calling someone psycho, lol 

[JDHillFan]

1 minute ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said:

What's really fun is seeing a MAGA guy calling someone psycho, lol 

You’re doing great!

[wnyguy]

8 hours ago, JaCrispy said:

No need to get so defensive…it’s just food for thought, and a topic for conversation…

 

Your ad hominem attacks against the guy really don’t seem warranted when all you have to do is say why you disagree…👍

 

 

Hey man, thanks for posting the videos, I am interested in the theories and like the info.

[JaCrispy]

5 hours ago, JDHillFan said:

I can’t actually say that I disagree. I won’t invest my time listening to fringe lunatics like this goof and Candace Owens. If this is food for thought, it’s food tainted with botulism. 

That is certainly your prerogative 👍

[Tenhigh]

3 hours ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said:

Why would I know who he is? I don't ingest right wing media 

 

Kind of arrogant to think I should know him just because you do  

 

No, it's because this article you poster about Turning Point and Kirk in the Epstein thread. 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited 2 hours ago by Tenhigh

[JDHillFan]

2 minutes ago, Tenhigh said:

No, it's because this article you poster about Turning Point and Kirk in the Epstein thread. 

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/07/12/turning-point-usa-conference-concerns-trump/
 

    By Natalie Allison
 

    TAMPA — At a gathering of some of President Donald Trump’s most devout supporters — young conservatives spending a summer weekend strategizing on how to further the MAGA movement — a cloud hung over the convention center.
 

    Attendees of Turning Point USA’s Student Action Summit erupted in boos over the Trump administration’s handling of files related to Jeffrey Epstein, the deceased child predator. Top MAGA leaders criticized the White House from stage and on their wide-reaching social media accounts throughout the weekend, attacking not only Trump’s attorney general, Pam Bondi, for declining to release more on the investigation and potential Epstein associates, but raising questions about why the president seemed to be out of step with his base.
 

    The concerns raised at the conference followed days of conservative foment that continued to build over the weekend, fueling anxiety among Trump allies that conspiracy theories surrounding Epstein, widely promoted by Trump and administration officials before they took office, will continue to haunt them.
 

    Even Trump’s preferred cable network, Fox News, raised a warning Sunday morning, with “Fox & Friends” host Charles Hurt saying the White House needed to provide more answers. “There has to be some explanation,” Hurt said, “and I think that’s why you have a lot of people still ... with a lot a very valid questions.” Anchor Kevin Corke and co-host Rachel Campos-Duffy, the wife of Trump’s transportation secretary, Sean P. Duffy, agreed that his supporters needed a more substantive response.
 

     
 

    Kirk warned that Trump’s newer young male supporters are especially rankled by what they see as a lack of transparency on Epstein.
 

    “Their trust of government is zero,” Kirk said. “The only reason they were able to succumb themselves to engaging was because of Trump.”
 

     
 

    But the prospect that the White House might alienate key segments of the movement that returned Trump to Washington was a constant theme in speeches from some of the biggest commentators in MAGA politics.
 

     
 

    “This could actually cost Trump in the midterms,” conservative podcaster and former Fox News host Megyn Kelly said, as she spent more than half an hour railing against Bondi. “We can’t lose any of the MAGA base.”
 

    Former senior White House adviser Stephen K. Bannon, taping his daily podcast from a small stage in the convention center Friday morning, was even more alarmed.
 

    “It’s deeper than Epstein!” Bannon shouted as a crowd gathered around him.
 

     
 

    The administration’s refusal to release more on the investigation and Epstein’s potential ties to power, as it had once promised to do, is “not about just a pedophile ring and all that,” he said. “It’s about who governs us.”
 

    “For this to go away,” a fired-up Bannon continued, telling his producers they would have to blow through the scheduled commercial break, “you’re going to lose 10 percent of the MAGA movement. If we lose 10 percent of the MAGA movement right now, we’re going to lose 40 seats in ’26, we’re going to lose the presidency. They don’t even have to steal it.”
 

     
 

    Tucker Carlson, another former Fox News host, said the official response to criticism over Epstein reminded him of the Biden administration.
 

    “The fact that the U.S. government, the one that I voted for, refused to take my question seriously and instead said ‘Case closed. Shut up, conspiracy theorist’ was too much for me, and I don’t think the rest of us should be satisfied with that,” Carlson said.
 

     
 

     
 

 

 

ZING!!

 

This should be good…

[Trump_is_Mentally_fit]

5 minutes ago, Tenhigh said:

No, it's because this article you poster about Turning Point and Kirk in the Epstein thread. 

 

 

 

 

 

Sorry, still don't remember him from that. Just something I posted without getting to into. I can post about the Heritage Foudadtion, too, but I don't know who runs it. 

 

So, It still stands that I didn't know who the guy was until he got wacked. 

[JDHillFan]

4 minutes ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said:

Sorry, still don't remember him from that. Just something I posted without getting to into. I can post about the Heritage Foudadtion, too, but I don't know who runs it. 

 

So, It still stands that I didn't know who the guy was until he got wacked. 

At least we are now certain that when you post a link it’s not something you actually read and found interesting. Good to know. 
 

🤡 

[Trump_is_Mentally_fit]

6 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

At least we are now certain that when you post a link it’s not something you actually read and found interesting. Good to know. 
 

🤡

As long as I get the gist of the argument correct, no need knowing absolutely everything. As I'm sure you in no way do. You idiot 

 

Boom! 

[JaCrispy]

Guys, please, no need for name calling…Just consume the info, and make of it what you will…

 

The point of this thread is to just share info you won’t find in the main stream media…Thanks. 👍

 

 

[The Frankish Reich]

(((They))) took out Charlie!

 

Isn't that the way QAnon used to do it?

[Tenhigh]

1 hour ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said:

Sorry, still don't remember him from that. Just something I posted without getting to into. I can post about the Heritage Foudadtion, too, but I don't know who runs it. 

 

So, It still stands that I didn't know who the guy was until he got wacked.