muppy Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago (edited) 10 hours ago, JDHillFan said: This post is a perfect example of going through life, at least here at PPP, with blinders on. Virtually everyone here that leans right or voted for Trump has acknowledged that he is a gaseous, narcissistic dufus. The bolded is a ridiculous, uninformed comment based solely on feelings. well I took you off of ignore to read THIS. The harbinger of all posters opinions is JDHillfan. I GOT THE MEMO My "feelings" are based on what I read and hear you can go **** ALL THE WAY OFF MAGA at its finest BLECH how that's feel homey? lol I could care less.. Rage about muppys feelings. LOLOL Edited 7 hours ago by muppy 1 1
JDHillFan Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago 2 minutes ago, muppy said: well I took you off of ignore to read THIS. The harbinger of all posters opinions is JDHillfan. I GOT THE MEMO My "feelings" are based on what I read and you can go **** ALL THE WAY OFF MAGA at its finest BLECH how that's feel homey? lol I could care less.. Rage about muppys feelings. LOLOL Try reading with some level of discernment then. You won’t come off so ill-informed. Love the ALL CAPS. Really brings the point home. 1
muppy Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago Just now, JDHillFan said: Try reading with some level of discernment then. You won’t come off so ill-informed. Love the ALL CAPS. Really brings the point home. ***** off. is that clearer? 1
JDHillFan Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago Just now, muppy said: ***** off. is that clearer? Yes
Mikie2times Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago 20 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: This post is a perfect example of going through life, at least here at PPP, with blinders on. Virtually everyone here that leans right or voted for Trump has acknowledged that he is a gaseous, narcissistic dufus. The bolded is a ridiculous, uninformed comment based solely on feelings. I don’t really think she has blinders on. Maybe those admissions happened before I was around here. He clearly has a pretty large following that doesn’t seem to acknowledge what you mentioned. But maybe you’re right, I don’t know for sure. All I can say is that it's easier for me to focus on the politics in a vacuum when I know the person I'm talking with sees him the same way I do, at least in terms of character. As I’ve said before, I do have concerns that he could be manipulated by other world leaders or shifting global circumstances, simply because of his obvious personality flaws. A simple example, today he said that while he’ll ask Iran not to pursue a nuclear weapon, he doesn’t really believe that’s necessary anymore. So here’s an honest question, do you think he might hold back from aggressively pursuing efforts to prevent Iran from reestablishing its nuclear program, just to validate the narrative that it’s already been “obliterated”? I believe he would. And that would be a huge mistake. He’s vulnerable to miscalculations because of who he is. I’ve never felt that way about other presidents, even ones I considered incompetent. They didn’t reveal enough of themselves to be manipulated or they didn't need the credit or validation in the ways he seems to.
muppy Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago (edited) oh and for the record: I can understand how people who believe the democratic party has gone TOO Far Left hence vote for Naranja. They are reaping what they sowed now. a lot of them wish they had that vote back Our POTUS a supreme troll ******* who is defended because he is less gross than any other candidate isnt that just PERFECT 7 minutes ago, Mikie2times said: I don’t really think she has blinders on. Maybe those admissions happened before I was around here. He clearly has a pretty large following that doesn’t seem to acknowledge what you mentioned. But maybe you’re right, I don’t know for sure. All I can say is that it's easier for me to focus on the politics in a vacuum when I know the person I'm talking with sees him the same way I do, at least in terms of character. As I’ve said before, I do have concerns that he could be manipulated by other world leaders or shifting global circumstances, simply because of his obvious personality flaws. A simple example, today he said that while he’ll ask Iran not to pursue a nuclear weapon, he doesn’t really believe that’s necessary anymore. So here’s an honest question, do you think he might hold back from aggressively pursuing efforts to prevent Iran from reestablishing its nuclear program, just to validate the narrative that it’s already been “obliterated”? I believe he would. And that would be a huge mistake. He’s vulnerable to miscalculations because of who he is. I’ve never felt that way about other presidents, even ones I considered incompetent. They didn’t reveal enough of themselves to be manipulated or they didn't need the credit or validation in the ways he seems to. Mikey this place is a dump under usual circumstances. During a national constitutional crisis MILLIONS of people are speaking up. and Yes I Live outside of a chatroom and talk to people who follow Trump who see his path as Righteous. RIGHTEOUS even I throw up in my mouth. Give me a break MAGA the savior excuse me REALLY? pfft If I Lived in a chatroom and only valued opinions stated there , wouldn't that be limiting? MAGA LOL Edited 17 hours ago by muppy 1
muppy Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago 9 minutes ago, Mikie2times said: I don’t really think she has blinders on. Maybe those admissions happened before I was around here. He clearly has a pretty large following that doesn’t seem to acknowledge what you mentioned. But maybe you’re right, I don’t know for sure. All I can say is that it's easier for me to focus on the politics in a vacuum when I know the person I'm talking with sees him the same way I do, at least in terms of character. As I’ve said before, I do have concerns that he could be manipulated by other world leaders or shifting global circumstances, simply because of his obvious personality flaws. A simple example, today he said that while he’ll ask Iran not to pursue a nuclear weapon, he doesn’t really believe that’s necessary anymore. So here’s an honest question, do you think he might hold back from aggressively pursuing efforts to prevent Iran from reestablishing its nuclear program, just to validate the narrative that it’s already been “obliterated”? I believe he would. And that would be a huge mistake. He’s vulnerable to miscalculations because of who he is. I’ve never felt that way about other presidents, even ones I considered incompetent. They didn’t reveal enough of themselves to be manipulated or they didn't need the credit or validation in the ways he seems to. hold yer nose bro. a line of bull#### is coming from senor JD 1
JDHillFan Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Mikie2times said: So here’s an honest question, do you think he might hold back from aggressively pursuing efforts to prevent Iran from reestablishing its nuclear program, just to validate the narrative that it’s already been “obliterated”? No. People with your level of Trump agita (is that better than saying TDS? It certainly seems a fair description) will create that scenario in their minds regardless. Iranian state tv initially reported minimal damage and CNN followed up with a low-confidence assessment that 14 30k bombs resulted in a flesh wound to the Iranian nuclear weapons program. That’s all you need to believe what you want to believe. 8 minutes ago, Mikie2times said: Maybe those admissions happened before I was around here Those admissions occur regularly. All you have to do is read them. 9 minutes ago, muppy said: oh and for the record: I can understand how people who believe the democratic party has gone TOO Far Left hence vote for Naranja. They are reaping what they sowed now. a lot of them wish they had that vote back Our POTUS a supreme troll ******* who is defended because he is less gross than any other candidate isnt that just PERFECT Mikey this place is a dump under usual circumstances. During a national constitutional crisis MILLIONS of people are speaking up. and Yes I Live outside of a chatroom and talk to people who follow Trump who see his path as Righteous. RIGHTEOUS even I throw up in my mouth. Give me a break MAGA the savior excuse me REALLY? pfft If I Lived in a chatroom and only valued opinions stated there , wouldn't that be limiting? MAGA LOL What is the current constitutional crisis you speak of? Sounds made up.
SectionC3 Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 9 hours ago, JDHillFan said: No. People with your level of Trump agita (is that better than saying TDS? It certainly seems a fair description) will create that scenario in their minds regardless. Iranian state tv initially reported minimal damage and CNN followed up with a low-confidence assessment that 14 30k bombs resulted in a flesh wound to the Iranian nuclear weapons program. That’s all you need to believe what you want to believe. Those admissions occur regularly. All you have to do is read them. What is the current constitutional crisis you speak of? Sounds made up. Looks like you’re coping and seething now that you realized that Iran still has the enriched uranium that was the point of this whole exercise in the first instance.
JDHillFan Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 1 minute ago, SectionC3 said: Looks like you’re coping and seething now that you realized that Iran still has the enriched uranium that was the point of this whole exercise in the first instance. You have Daddy Trump issues and it’s important for you to believe the mission was a failure. That’s part of why you referred to Drudge and Iranian State TV within the first hour or two. Best wishes as you continue to imagine the worst. 1
Doc Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago (edited) 36 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: Looks like you’re coping and seething now that you realized that Iran still has the enriched uranium that was the point of this whole exercise in the first instance. Hoax. There’s no evidence they still have the enriched uranium and their ability to produce nuclear weapons has been set back by years. Moreover, they now know that the US can and will strike them at any time without them knowing. Edited 7 hours ago by Doc
4th&long Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 34 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: You have Daddy Trump issues and it’s important for you to believe the mission was a failure. That’s part of why you referred to Drudge and Iranian State TV within the first hour or two. Best wishes as you continue to imagine the worst. You have TDS - trump dick sucker.
SectionC3 Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 38 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: You have Daddy Trump issues and it’s important for you to believe the mission was a failure. That’s part of why you referred to Drudge and Iranian State TV within the first hour or two. Best wishes as you continue to imagine the worst. More coping and seething from you! Have a great day! 7 minutes ago, Doc said: Hoax. There’s no evidence they still have the enriched uranium and their ability to produce nuclear weapons has been set back by years. Moreover, they now know that the US can and will strike them at any time without them knowing. Hoax on the absence of evidence. It hasn't been destroyed. And, based on the report in the J Post last night, it probably isn't buried under a mountain of rubble. Also, hoax on your contention that the ability to produce a nuke has been set back by years. There is no credible report of that issue. And, the leaks to date suggest that the delay in that process actually will be measured only in months.
JDHillFan Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 1 minute ago, 4th&long said: You have TDS - trump dick sucker. I won’t lie. This is very hurtful. Especially during pride month. 1
SectionC3 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 5 minutes ago, 4th&long said: You have TDS - trump dick sucker. Careful. He's going to initially seethe at that comment, and then cope a little bit later with some nonsense response. Just now, JDHillFan said: I won’t lie. This is very hurtful. Especially during pride month. Exactly on time. There's the seethe. 1
4th&long Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 4 minutes ago, Doc said: Hoax. There’s no evidence they still have the enriched uranium and their ability to produce nuclear weapons has been set back by years. Moreover, they now know that the US can and will strike them at any time without them knowing. Without them knowing? Hahaha. How do you think they had time to move the enriched uranium? Donny two dolls talked about it on TV for 3 days or so before he did it. Can you imagine Obama coming out in TV interviews for 3 days saying "we know where OBL is but we are not sure if we will send a seal team in to get him?. I'll get back to you in two weeks"? OBL would have been long gone!
JDHillFan Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Just now, SectionC3 said: Careful. He's going to initially seethe at that comment, and then cope a little bit later with some nonsense response. Exactly on time. There's the seethe. Yes. Coping AND seething. It’s all so upsetting.
4th&long Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 1 minute ago, SectionC3 said: Careful. He's going to initially seethe at that comment, and then cope a little bit later with some nonsense response. Exactly on time. There's the seethe. His responses are always nonsense. What else can he say? No defense for donny two dolls.
Doc Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 15 minutes ago, 4th&long said: Without them knowing? Hahaha. How do you think they had time to move the enriched uranium? Donny two dolls talked about it on TV for 3 days or so before he did it. Can you imagine Obama coming out in TV interviews for 3 days saying "we know where OBL is but we are not sure if we will send a seal team in to get him?. I'll get back to you in two weeks"? OBL would have been long gone! The strike team was able to get in and out without any counter response from Iran. So either they didn’t know the strike was coming or they just let it happen. Which do you think is more plausible?
Recommended Posts