Roundybout Posted Wednesday at 08:24 PM Posted Wednesday at 08:24 PM The MTA refused to comply, held its ground, and scored a massive victory. The MAGA government cannot tell them what to do. A huge win for us city planners! 1 1 1
JFKjr Posted Wednesday at 09:10 PM Posted Wednesday at 09:10 PM "The Elites" are going to be upset over this one!
B-Man Posted Wednesday at 09:13 PM Posted Wednesday at 09:13 PM From the Hochul thread this morning. I guess Rondabout missed it. New York Gov. Kathy Hochul supports the program that costs New Yorkers extra money in her attempts to force more people into taking public transit. Hochul spiked the ball and bragged about at least temporarily defeating Trump's efforts to save people money: It couldn't be more clear what the Democrat "priorities" are.
4th&long Posted Wednesday at 10:32 PM Posted Wednesday at 10:32 PM That's because donny two dolls is a *****en loser. 1
Roundybout Posted Wednesday at 11:51 PM Author Posted Wednesday at 11:51 PM 2 hours ago, B-Man said: From the Hochul thread this morning. I guess Rondabout missed it. New York Gov. Kathy Hochul supports the program that costs New Yorkers extra money in her attempts to force more people into taking public transit. Hochul spiked the ball and bragged about at least temporarily defeating Trump's efforts to save people money: It couldn't be more clear what the Democrat "priorities" are. The solution is simple - take the subway. This is a win for the actual residents of NYC who no longer have to deal with congestion and pollution. 1
B-Man Posted yesterday at 03:28 AM Posted yesterday at 03:28 AM 3 hours ago, Roundybout said: The solution is simple - take the subway. This is a win for the actual residents of NYC who no longer have to deal with congestion and pollution. Increase taxes on the public. What a win for the residents 1 1
Orlando Buffalo Posted yesterday at 11:23 AM Posted yesterday at 11:23 AM I need to find on what grounds the judge is making this ruling. When this first happened it was a temporary program that needs DOT approval to continue, the DOT removed it's approval, how does a judge get to overrule that? It is possible the prior articles are incorrect but a judge should not have the ability to override an entire federal agency unless there is a clear violation of law, which there is not here.
Roundybout Posted yesterday at 11:53 AM Author Posted yesterday at 11:53 AM 8 hours ago, B-Man said: Increase taxes on the public. What a win for the residents The residents take the subway. 30 minutes ago, Orlando Buffalo said: I need to find on what grounds the judge is making this ruling. When this first happened it was a temporary program that needs DOT approval to continue, the DOT removed it's approval, how does a judge get to overrule that? It is possible the prior articles are incorrect but a judge should not have the ability to override an entire federal agency unless there is a clear violation of law, which there is not here. I believe the grounds are that the federal government cannot tell a state entity, the MTA, what to do with their policies. 1
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted yesterday at 12:06 PM Posted yesterday at 12:06 PM 14 hours ago, B-Man said: From the Hochul thread this morning. I guess Rondabout missed it. New York Gov. Kathy Hochul supports the program that costs New Yorkers extra money in her attempts to force more people into taking public transit. Hochul spiked the ball and bragged about at least temporarily defeating Trump's efforts to save people money: It couldn't be more clear what the Democrat "priorities" are. I could be wrong, but believe Roundy is a proponent of something called The Rickshaw Revolution. 1
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted yesterday at 12:13 PM Posted yesterday at 12:13 PM 12 hours ago, Roundybout said: The solution is simple - take the subway. This is a win for the actual residents of NYC who no longer have to deal with congestion and pollution. Agree. Get underground in the tunnels where the air is pure with just the hint of urine and vomit in the air. Chances are really, really high a taxpayer won’t be slashed, mugged, sexually assaulted, accosted or pushed onto the tracks.
ScotSHO Posted yesterday at 12:22 PM Posted yesterday at 12:22 PM 14 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: I could be wrong, but believe Roundy is a proponent of something called The Rickshaw Revolution. Can you get to everything you need (social services, 7-11 and planned parenthood) in 15 min or less? I believe that is a yes - Viva La Rickshaws! 1
Gregg Posted yesterday at 12:31 PM Posted yesterday at 12:31 PM 9 hours ago, B-Man said: Increase taxes on the public. What a win for the residents I thought the people of NY were against this. To pay more to travel into NYC is not a win for the people. 2
Roundybout Posted yesterday at 12:39 PM Author Posted yesterday at 12:39 PM (edited) 7 minutes ago, Gregg said: I thought the people of NY were against this. To pay more to travel into NYC is not a win for the people. Congestion pricing polls very well among residents of NYC. https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/nyc-congestion-pricing-support-grows/6165502/ https://pfnyc.org/news/new-poll-ny-voters-say-congestion-pricing-has-led-to-faster-commutes-and-less-traffic/ Further, it is doing its job in reducing traffic and pollution. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2025/05/11/upshot/congestion-pricing.html?unlocked_article_code=1.H08.pRhU.8mmmahjJyu1k&smid=url-share https://www.curbed.com/article/100-dayscongestion-pricing-mta-results.html Edited yesterday at 12:39 PM by Roundybout 1
Orlando Buffalo Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago 3 hours ago, Roundybout said: I believe the grounds are that the federal government cannot tell a state entity, the MTA, what to do with their policies. Then why was it given temporary status with the DOT? I am not arguing with you, because that is a logical thought, but then the DOT is not approving it.
ComradeKayAdams Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago 4 hours ago, Roundybout said: I believe the grounds are that the federal government cannot tell a state entity, the MTA, what to do with their policies. Yeah, pretty much. It’s a standard Pigovian tax that should stay within the purview of local and state government. It has cleared all reasonable environmental reviews. Early quality control reports in Manhattan are promising (though there are admittedly some parking logistical issues still to be sorted out just north of the congestion pricing district). Favorability poll numbers in the metro area are climbing. Similarly implemented programs in London and Singapore have been successful for quite a long time. Oh yeah…and the Biden administration already approved it! So on what grounds is the Trump administration planning to overturn it?? Working-class people from Jersey and Strong Island can use public transportation…just as the Pigovian tax intended! Residents still complaining should finally make do on their hollow threats and move to a red state. Everyone else will focus on pushing local government to do something useful with all this additional MTA revenue. On that to-do list, I recommend upgrading the public transportation infrastructure and planting more urban trees. Also: please vote Zohran Mamdani on Tuesday, June 24 (while leaving Andrew Cuomo completely off your top-5 ballot list). 1 hour ago, Orlando Buffalo said: Then why was it given temporary status with the DOT? I am not arguing with you, because that is a logical thought, but then the DOT is not approving it. Dunno…you tell us. I suspect another opportunity to “own the libs” and nothing more.
Recommended Posts