leh-nerd skin-erd Posted July 15 Posted July 15 51 minutes ago, JFKjr said: I will respectfully disagree. Just as Trump's tariffs are not the full intended policy, just his opening gambit, this bit on the Epstein Files is similar. He wants Libs/Dems to "call for their release." And yes this thing will eventually be wide open. As it should be. I don’t think so. I think he played things in a certain way to maximize effect, they lost track of the end game and didn’t stick the landing. There is no need to triangulate coordinates, involve agents skilled in wet work and go full Art of War when you have the goods, have the receipts, and control the delivery of the message. As always though, if I’m wrong, I’m happy to swing back here and take my lumps. 2 1
JFKjr Posted July 15 Posted July 15 3 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: I don’t think so. I think he played things in a certain way to maximize effect, they lost track of the end game and didn’t stick the landing. There is no need to triangulate coordinates, involve agents skilled in wet work and go full Art of War when you have the goods, have the receipts, and control the delivery of the message. As always though, if I’m wrong, I’m happy to swing back here and take my lumps. Trump has been playing the long game for a VERY long time. Go back and listen to his 2017 inauguration speech if you've forgotten it. 1
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted July 15 Posted July 15 4 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: A source perhaps "doc" will appreciate. Do you think the story is true? https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/epstein-showed-photos-of-trump-with-topless-women-he-could-ruin-donald-claims-author/articleshow/114856535.cms I think it’s more likely that the Martians actually landed at the Jersey Shore in 19ought3and 8, and mind-melded all of us into believing it was just a radio broadcast. Thank you. 1 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted July 15 Posted July 15 1 hour ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: I think it’s more likely that the Martians actually landed at the Jersey Shore in 19ought3and 8, and mind-melded all of us into believing it was just a radio broadcast. Thank you. what is your reasoning for this conclusion?
Roundybout Posted July 15 Posted July 15 2 hours ago, JFKjr said: I will respectfully disagree. Just as Trump's tariffs are not the full intended policy, just his opening gambit, this bit on the Epstein Files is similar. He wants Libs/Dems to "call for their release." And yes this thing will eventually be wide open. As it should be. If the plan was to make Dems release them, why did every Republican vote against the release? Further, if they were made up by Democrats, as Trump alleges, why wouldn’t they be released?
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted July 15 Posted July 15 53 minutes ago, JFKjr said: Trump has been playing the long game for a VERY long time. Go back and listen to his 2017 inauguration speech if you've forgotten it. I think DJT is one of the most resilient human beings ever born, with an unfathomable ability to withstand onslaughts from multiple enemies at any time. He took everything his enemies threw at him, not only survived but thrived. Still, this is a big stretch for me. 22 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: what is your reasoning for this conclusion? I've never actually seen a Martian. Duh. 1
wnyguy Posted July 15 Posted July 15 14 minutes ago, Roundybout said: If the plan was to make Dems release them, why did every Republican vote against the release? Further, if they were made up by Democrats, as Trump alleges, why wouldn’t they be released? Yeah, I'm with you on this one Roundy, I don't get it. 1
JFKjr Posted July 15 Posted July 15 1 hour ago, Roundybout said: If the plan was to make Dems release them, why did every Republican vote against the release? Further, if they were made up by Democrats, as Trump alleges, why wouldn’t they be released? It's the difference between your average fan watching a Bills game, and what's being discussed in coaches' meetings. You're an average fan and get your info from average sources. 2 1
TH3 Posted July 15 Posted July 15 3 hours ago, JFKjr said: I will respectfully disagree. Just as Trump's tariffs are not the full intended policy, just his opening gambit, this bit on the Epstein Files is similar. He wants Libs/Dems to "call for their release." And yes this thing will eventually be wide open. As it should be. You are absolutely stoned. Do you just have posters of DT….or did you put the statue in your yard too?
Joe Ferguson forever Posted July 15 Posted July 15 11 minutes ago, JFKjr said: It's the difference between your average fan watching a Bills game, and what's being discussed in coaches' meetings. You're an average fan and get your info from average sources. why wouldn't they be released? Coaches decisions are explained after the game.
ComradeKayAdams Posted July 15 Posted July 15 7 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said: I have to admit none of this makes much sense to me. I don't think anyone cares much about Obama or Hillary at this point. Nobody posting here is sitting around with baited breath hanging on every word out of Trump's mouth. I certainly am not. My overall view of Trump is I'm willing to tolerate him because the alternative is much worse. If anything, he's lost the audience with his comments on the Epstein "files" rather than everyone adjusting their views to reconcile with his statements. Few to none buys his explanation. And you definitely lost me with the argument about abuse from elites. That is clearly a construct of the political left. The entire victim narrative is at the core of almost every progressive/liberal/far left belief. Its at the core of every argument, such as immigration enforcement with the "hating brown people" routine or with taxes and making the rich "pay their fair share". The system praying on the weak while the libs control most of the system. The progressive mind thinks of themselves as championing the downtrodden of the world while in reality its a big self-serving hustle. A big paradox and contradiction. At least up until January 2025 when they lost much of their power and watched helplessly as their apparatus and mechanisms of control were dismantled. Given all that they've committed to violent rhetoric and violent actions. A review of Epstein's history of sexual misconduct associated with minors and young women with a convictions and guilty pleas followed by slap on the wrist type sentencing and his documented associations with a lot of wealthy, powerful, celebrity types, and others complete with photo ops with young women made to do who knows what, puts out a lot of smoke that suggests there's a fire there. Most speculation centered around some intelligence community including the CIA, Mossad, MI6 running a blackmail operation. But isn’t the victimhood narrative at the core of every political philosophy, even if the specter of oppression is simply one’s political opponent? My issue with your post is threefold: 1. Workers are most definitely the victims of wealth theft in the modern American economy. This should be so bleeping self-evident that I need not write a ten-paragraph treatise here on the twenty-first century revision of the classical economic Labor Theory of Value…though I will if you guys ask nicely… 2. MAGA is a cult-like establishment movement masquerading as a populist one because its acolytes can’t articulately identify their oppressors. 3. The actual far left (Bernie, AOC, etc.) hasn’t had any meaningful power in American national politics since the days of FDR. Getting back on topic…I like to fashion myself as an uber-rational politico who looks disdainfully down on any manner of conspiracy theory devoid of conclusive evidence. Two delightfully wicked exceptions: 1. The CIA killed JFK. 2. Mossad controlled Epstein, and they had dirt on members of both parties, politicians and megadonors, including Trump and Bill Clinton. 4 hours ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said: But the rich and powerful are literally using the right wing politicians they have bought to take health insurance away from the poorest in society to pay for tax cuts for the wealthy. That's just a fact And the attack on the working class immigrants is pretty sick. Walking on the weakest in society to satisfy political ambition. Race is absolutely at the heart of the "we are being invaded, we are being replaced" ideology. 1 1
Roundybout Posted July 15 Posted July 15 Just now, Big Blitz said: Well surely the truth and safety of billions is more important!
Joe Ferguson forever Posted July 15 Posted July 15 (edited) 19 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: no. the amendment never made it out of committee with only 1 R voting for it and 1 abstaining. https://www.yahoo.com/news/republicans-block-effort-force-release-095120612.html Edited July 15 by Joe Ferguson forever
Big Blitz Posted July 15 Author Posted July 15 10 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: no. the amendment never made it out of committee with only 1 R voting for it and 1 abstaining. https://www.yahoo.com/news/republicans-block-effort-force-release-095120612.html We already knew this yesterday.
Joe Ferguson forever Posted July 15 Posted July 15 2 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: We already knew this yesterday. so why do you keep posting that the R' on committee tanked this because of the Genius bill. They didn't want their members to vote and show how filthy they are. The fact that it was a requested amendment doesn't change that.
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted July 15 Posted July 15 47 minutes ago, ComradeKayAdams said: But isn’t the victimhood narrative at the core of every political philosophy, even if the specter of oppression is simply one’s political opponent? My issue with your post is threefold: My unsolicited response to your response is folded over only once: Yes. 1
Big Blitz Posted July 15 Author Posted July 15 Just now, Joe Ferguson forever said: so why do you keep posting that the R' on committee tanked this because of the Genius bill. They didn't want their members to vote and show how filthy they are. The fact that it was a requested amendment doesn't change that. There was no House vote on the Epstein release. It was a vote on the Genius Bill - attached to this https://thehill.com/homenews/house/5402350-conservatives-procedural-vote-crypto-revolt/amp/
ComradeKayAdams Posted July 15 Posted July 15 1 hour ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: My unsolicited response to your response is folded over only once: Yes. You cheeky son of a b!tch… Big boy Leh-nerd presumes to have big boy political thoughts for Commie Kay. How adorable. Almost makes me want to pinch those cheeks. Or rather, PUNCH IN those cheeks… YET ANOTHER EMERGENCY MATH POP QUIZ FOR LEH-NERD SKIN-ERD (because the forum friendship between Kay and Leh-nerd is once again in peril): Q1. Kay orders 10 “Hot Girls for Zohran” t-shirts online: 2 red, 2 yellow, 2 blue, 2 grey, and 2 white. Kay makes this purchase with Leh-nerd’s credit card that she stole from his wallet following a violent altercation. Upon delivery, Kay modifies one shirt of each color into a cute crop top style. Because of the aforementioned violent altercation in the state of New York, Kay decides to pack her sh!t up ASAP and lie low in sunny San Diego with Muppy for 5 days. Kay also immediately adopts Leh-nerd’s unethical omnivore diet so that she can go “incognito mode” and quickly raise her svelte 19.3 BMI to Leh-nerd’s sloppy 24.8. If Kay wants to wear a unique “Hot Girls for Zohran” shirt style for each day of her 5-day fugitive excursion, how many different combinations of t-shirts can she pack? Note: you may or may not need to recall Stokes’s Theorem for conservative vector fields: the line integral of the vector field around any closed curve is ZERO. Q2. Kay calls a criminal audible and now intends to clean up the scene of the aforementioned bloody altercation before fleeing the state. She uses bleach plus all 5 crop tops as wash rags in some manner. How many different combinations of t-shirts will Kay now be able to pack? Please take my quiz seriously this time, Leh-nerd. Our forum friendship hangs in the very balance… 1 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted July 15 Posted July 15 1 hour ago, Big Blitz said: There was no House vote on the Epstein release. It was a vote on the Genius Bill - attached to this https://thehill.com/homenews/house/5402350-conservatives-procedural-vote-crypto-revolt/amp/ The epstein issue wasn't bn the bill for this vote! It never made it out of committee. What about that do you not understand. Chip Roy's abstention killed it. f'in pu$$y.
Recommended Posts