Pete Hegseth: The Josh Allen of Department of WAR Secretaries.

[daz28]

1 minute ago, JDHillFan said:

Is it possible that big time South American drug lords could modify their boats to hold more fuel or have fueling provisions planned out? Is that a bridge too far for pen, paper, and math skills? 

It actually isn't.  You can't modify those boats to hold 1500 gallons of fuel. The bridge is literally WAYY too far. They also don't traffic fentanyl from Venezuela, and 90% of coke goes from Columbia, via the Pacific(American) Ocean to Mexico, as per the DEA in 2024. 

[BillsFanNC]

 ⬆️ 

 

[daz28]

2 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

 ⬆️ 

 

The physics behind how much cargo a vessel can hold, how much fuel that 3-300 hp engines use, and the relative weight of gasoline is a hoax?  

[BillsFanNC]

[Roundybout]

33 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

Is it possible that big time South American drug lords could modify their boats to hold more fuel or have fueling provisions planned out? Is that a bridge too far for pen, paper, and math skills? 

Where are you going to put the several hundred gallons of extra fuel needed on these boats, along with the blow?

[JDHillFan]

43 minutes ago, daz28 said:

It actually isn't.  You can't modify those boats to hold 1500 gallons of fuel. The bridge is literally WAYY too far. They also don't traffic fentanyl from Venezuela, and 90% of coke goes from Columbia, via the Pacific(American) Ocean to Mexico, as per the DEA in 2024. 

You seem to believe that a high speed boat gets loaded with narcotics in a South American location and then takes off to a final destination, hands the drugs off, and calls it a day. No fueling stops, no shorter routes to islands or ports where the drugs get transferred to other vessels, etc. Because of math. This is a take equivalent to your brilliant analysis of the strategic petroleum reserve or your claim of America First being a group of 1M American nazis. 

14 minutes ago, Roundybout said:

Where are you going to put the several hundred gallons of extra fuel needed on these boats, along with the blow?

I don’t have an answer for that. I don’t know that it’s possible. Do you know that it’s impossible? The drug trade is full of industrious thinkers, isn’t it? Are you of the Daz-ian belief that none of these drugs are destined for America because of math? 

Edited yesterday at 03:04 AM by JDHillFan

[B-Man]

 

 

B

   U

       M

             P

 

 

 

[B-Man]

 

 

 

 

 

 

[BillsFanNC]

Cope and seethe.

 

 

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

21 hours ago, JDHillFan said:

You seem to believe that a high speed boat gets loaded with narcotics in a South American location and then takes off to a final destination, hands the drugs off, and calls it a day. No fueling stops, no shorter routes to islands or ports where the drugs get transferred to other vessels, etc. Because of math. This is a take equivalent to your brilliant analysis of the strategic petroleum reserve or your claim of America First being a group of 1M American nazis. 

I don’t have an answer for that. I don’t know that it’s possible. Do you know that it’s impossible? The drug trade is full of industrious thinkers, isn’t it? Are you of the Daz-ian belief that none of these drugs are destined for America because of math? 

I hate that it went down like this, 

but someone had to lose.

It’s the politics of contraband,

It’s the smuggler’s blues. 

 

[pennstate10]

21 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

I refuse to click on links in this thread. 
 

But why is Trump napping?

[pennstate10]

On 12/1/2025 at 11:41 AM, sherpa said:

 

This is a totally false conclusion.

They are not "combatants" is any historically accepted sense.

Such a conclusion is preposterous.

They are criminals involved in a criminal enterprise.

They are very similar to anybody intentionally spreading a deadly virus in a region for simple monetary gain.

 

I would never advocate the killing of survivors after the threat has been eliminated, but nor would I advocate any legal prosecution of these people, which would tie up an overburdened US legal system by people who have no legal standing in the US.

They made their choice. The videos of the initial strikes were well publicized and available.

 

Further, I would be very reluctant to publicize more.

We have "allowed" millions and millions of people we know nothing about to enter this country under Biden.

Surely, a significant number have gravitated to the drug sales and distribution world.

We have seen some kill US citizens.

 

Putting warheads on foreheads, as we task our service members to do, has the possibility of energizing people of this ilk to seek revenge.

It would be incredibly simple to find out names go after those who do this and/or their families.

Enough video.

 

 

Huh.  
 

Looks like your dear leader is saying you’re wrong. 

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/ar-AA1REXql

 

Direct quote from the OG. “ this is war”

 

This is the problem when you throw your support to liars and grifters. 
 

You don’t know when they’re lying. 
 

 

[pennstate10]

Article in the National Review. You know, that bastion of liberal thought. 
 

Questioning the legality and constitutionality of the boat attacks. 
 

https://www-nationalreview-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.nationalreview.com/2025/12/a-fair-accounting-of-pete-hegseths-role-in-the-caribbean-boat-strike/amp/?amp_js_v=0.1&amp_gsa=1#webview=1&cap=swipe

 

“No matter its ill effects here at home, cocaine trafficking is not an act of war against the United States, and it is not terrorism. Under longstanding U.S. law, it is an activity that is deterred and punished via criminal prosecution in our courts. Drug boats are appropriately interdicted by boarding them on the high seas and seizing their cargo, not via missile strikes.”