BillsFanNC Posted May 8 Author Share Posted May 8 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted May 8 Share Posted May 8 6 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: Its starting to look like the only goal of this lawfare was her stories for the cycle. The actual case is weak as it comes. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted May 8 Share Posted May 8 What Americans see. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted May 8 Share Posted May 8 Just now, B-Man said: What Americans see. . Umm, isn't that kind of on Trump? I mean, if I'm ever on trial for falsifying financial records, I can assure you that a porn star (and I generally refuse to use that term - I will call her what she is, a sex worker; no one is a "star" if only porn addicts know their name) will not be involved in any way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted May 8 Author Share Posted May 8 Those walls be closing!! 😂 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted May 8 Share Posted May 8 REMINDER: Perhaps the weirdest, and by far the most unjust, thing about former President Donald Trump's trial in New York is that we do not know precisely what crime Trump is charged with committing. We're in the middle of the trial, with Trump facing a maximum of more than 100 years in prison, and we don't even know what the charges are! It's a surreal situation. Yes, we know that Trump is charged with falsifying business records of payments made to the porn actress Stormy Daniels in 2016 and 2017. But falsifying business records is a misdemeanor with a two-year statute of limitations, meaning prosecutors would be prohibited from charging Trump with that crime after 2019, which was five years ago. They obviously missed that deadline by a mile. We also know that New York law allows falsifying business records to be upgraded to a felony if the alleged falsification was done with "intent to defraud that includes an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof." In that case, the statute of limitations extends to five years, which would have allowed prosecutors to charge Trump as late as 2022. Prosecutors missed that deadline, too. Trump was indicted in 2023. How did that happen? Because of COVID-19, when New York extended its statute of limitations by a year. That allowed prosecutors to slip the charges in right before the new, one-time-only, six-year extended statute of limitations expired. But here's the thing. What was the "intent to commit another crime or aid and conceal the commission thereof" that prosecutors used to raise falsification of business records from a misdemeanor to a felony? In nearly every case of alleged falsification of records that has been charged as a felony in New York, the defendant was charged with another crime — that is, prosecutors made it clear what the other crime was. In Trump's case, the indictment did not specify any other crime. Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg said the law did not require him to specify the other crime. So Trump faced felony charges without knowing what he was accused of doing. And the really amazing thing is that the trial is now underway and Bragg has still not specified what the other crime is. It is a key element of the case. Without it, the charges against Trump could never have been brought because they were misdemeanors long past the statute of limitations. It is the other crime that makes this whole prosecution possible. But the prosecutor has not specified what it is. https://jewishworldreview.com/0524/york050824.php Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted May 9 Author Share Posted May 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted May 9 Author Share Posted May 9 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted May 9 Author Share Posted May 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted May 9 Author Share Posted May 9 Sounds pretty spot on... Mark this down: The NY trial judge is going to allow that case to go the jury and get a verdict (if the jury doesn't hang). He's then going to delay sentencing as long as he can. But before sentencing arrives, he's going to grant a motion for a new trial based on unduly prejudicial evidence having come from one or more witnesses. The political goals will have been accomplished -- the "evidence" was publicly aired in a courtroom and given saturation coverage in the media. A jury will have convicted Trump of felony offenses (if they don't hang). The campaign narrative is furthered. But the Judge won't end up suffering a reversal for his myriad errors in his biased decision making and conduct of the trial. He'll set a new trial date after the election. May 9, 12:55 am PT. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted May 9 Author Share Posted May 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted May 10 Author Share Posted May 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All_Pro_Bills Posted May 10 Share Posted May 10 19 hours ago, BillsFanNC said: Arch-criminal and creator of Russian collusion hoax that escaped all charges complains about justice system. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted May 10 Author Share Posted May 10 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted May 10 Author Share Posted May 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted May 10 Author Share Posted May 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted May 10 Author Share Posted May 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted May 10 Author Share Posted May 10 Oh. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts