Joe Ferguson forever Posted May 4 Share Posted May 4 On 5/2/2024 at 10:12 AM, JaCrispy said: Thomas is a black hero and a patriot …All young men would do well to strive to be like him…👍 Ya mean like accepting free trips and a house from a private individual with interest in the court's decisions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pokebball Posted May 4 Share Posted May 4 4 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Ya mean like accepting free trips and a house from a private individual with interest in the court's decisions? Which court decision? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDHillFan Posted May 4 Share Posted May 4 3 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Ya mean like accepting free trips and a house from a private individual with interest in the court's decisions? Go ahead. Use the slur you are so comfortable with. You know you want to. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted May 4 Author Share Posted May 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted May 4 Share Posted May 4 From the Senate floor (Wyden has much more knowledge on this than I do): https://www.finance.senate.gov/chairmans-news/wyden-statement-on-clarence-thomass-forgiven-quarter-million-dollar-rv-loan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pokebball Posted May 4 Share Posted May 4 4 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: From the Senate floor (Wyden has much more knowledge on this than I do): https://www.finance.senate.gov/chairmans-news/wyden-statement-on-clarence-thomass-forgiven-quarter-million-dollar-rv-loan LOL This is pure speculation and very partisan. Wyden needs to change bait and spots on this fishing expedition. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pokebball Posted May 4 Share Posted May 4 I see you responded with the red x. I had asked you which court decision. I'm asking again. Which court decision? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted May 4 Share Posted May 4 7 minutes ago, Pokebball said: LOL This is pure speculation and very partisan. Wyden needs to change bait and spots on this fishing expedition. what part do you disagree with? Be specific. he's documenting committee findings and Thomas refusal to respond. btw, the most obvious benefactor of his judicial largesse is his wife in regards to Jan 6. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pokebball Posted May 4 Share Posted May 4 15 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: what part do you disagree with? Be specific. he's documenting committee findings and Thomas refusal to respond. btw, the most obvious benefactor of his judicial largesse is his wife in regards to Jan 6. What case? It's kind of hard to discuss anything with you without you at least suggesting the case he was conflicted on Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted May 4 Share Posted May 4 2 hours ago, Pokebball said: What case? It's kind of hard to discuss anything with you without you at least suggesting the case he was conflicted on “Justice Thomas participated in cases related to Donald Trump’s efforts to rig and then overturn the 2020 election, while his wife was pushing to do the same. He was the lone dissent in a case that could have denied the January 6th Committee records pertaining to the same plot his wife supported. “At the bare minimum, Justice Thomas needs to recuse himself from any case related to the January 6th investigation, and should Donald Trump run again, any case related to the 2024 election.” Wyden speaking again to senators in the finance committee, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pokebball Posted May 4 Share Posted May 4 31 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: “Justice Thomas participated in cases related to Donald Trump’s efforts to rig and then overturn the 2020 election, while his wife was pushing to do the same. He was the lone dissent in a case that could have denied the January 6th Committee records pertaining to the same plot his wife supported. “At the bare minimum, Justice Thomas needs to recuse himself from any case related to the January 6th investigation, and should Donald Trump run again, any case related to the 2024 election.” Wyden speaking again to senators in the finance committee, Which case? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted May 4 Share Posted May 4 On 5/2/2024 at 10:25 AM, Tiberius said: Read any good books lately? . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 1 hour ago, B-Man said: . A guy who knows how to milk his position for corrupt gain. Disgusting 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 15 hours ago, Pokebball said: Which case? look it up. i'm not your librarian. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pokebball Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 1 hour ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: look it up. i'm not your librarian. I don't see conflict. I was wondering which case you did, and mostly why??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 You're as intellectually dishonest as Thomas. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/supreme-court-allows-jan-6-committee-to-get-trump-presidential-documents#:~:text=6 committee to get Trump presidential documents,-Politics Jan 19&text=WASHINGTON (AP) — In a,6 insurrection. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pokebball Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 1 minute ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: You're as intellectually dishonest as Thomas. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/supreme-court-allows-jan-6-committee-to-get-trump-presidential-documents#:~:text=6 committee to get Trump presidential documents,-Politics Jan 19&text=WASHINGTON (AP) — In a,6 insurrection. So you believe Thomas is conflicted by allowing greater transparency? Explain to my how any of the guys Thomas accepted gifts from, allegedly, benefitted from the this transparency. I mean of course, differently than you, me and the rest of America did, of this TRANSPARENCY. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Pokebball said: So you believe Thomas is conflicted by allowing greater transparency? read the article again. He ruled for opacity that stood to benefit trump and his own wife. "Alone among the justices, Clarence Thomas said he would have granted Trump’s request to keep the documents on hold." Edited May 5 by Joe Ferguson forever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pokebball Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 (edited) 14 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: read the article again. He ruled for opacity that stood to benefit trump and his own wife. "Alone among the justices, Clarence Thomas said he would have granted Trump’s request to keep the documents on hold." I'd file some ham sandwiches. Jees, you guys are amazing. You need a flippen clue of what a conflict of interest even is. Edited May 5 by Pokebball 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 (edited) 2 hours ago, Pokebball said: I'd file some ham sandwiches. Jees, you guys are amazing. You need a flippen clue of what a conflict of interest even is. i'd like folks like you to disappear. Unfortunately that isn't going to happen. But thanks for playing...Maybe a reading comprehension class would help. You mistook opacity for transparency. It's orwellian doublespeak and you're not good at it. Edited May 5 by Joe Ferguson forever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts