Jump to content

Jon Stewart returns to The Daily Show


Recommended Posts

Jon back in the seat during this important election season is a public service.

 

“We have two candidates who are chronologically outside the norm of anyone who has run for the presidency in this country, in the history of this country,” Stewart said of the 81-year-old Biden and 77-year-old Trump. “They are the oldest people ever to run for president — breaking by only four years the record that they set the last time they ran!” Stewart exclaimed.  

 

“We’re not suggesting neither man is vibrant, productive or even capable,” Stewart said.

 

“What’s crazy is thinking that we are the ones as voters who must silence concerns and criticisms. It is the candidates’ job to assuage concerns — not the voters’ job not to mention them.”

 

While Biden “isn’t Donald Trump,” Stewart said, mentioning the 45th president’s multiple indictments and legal cases against him, “the stakes of this election don’t make Donald Trump’s opponent less subject to scrutiny.”

 

“It actually makes him more subject to scrutiny,” Stewart said.

 

“If your guy loses, bad things might happen, but the country is not over. And if your guy wins, the country is in no way saved.”

 

“So the good news is: I’m not saying you don’t have to worry about who wins the election,” Stewart concluded.


“I’m saying you have to worry about every day before it, and every day after, forever.”

 

link

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

John Stewart is a punk and failed movie maker.  His crappy movie grossed $3M on a budget of $10M.  Must have run out of money.  Definitley ran out of talent.   What a mess.  

 

 

Edited by Irv
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haven't seen it since before  he was on the first time, Has to be over a decade ago.

Edited by Wacka
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
14 hours ago, BillStime said:

🎯

 

 

John Stewart was right on the money! The hypocrisy of these news outlets is sick, s well as O’Leary. I can’t believe that guy was stupid enough to go on tv and say that. 
 

Stewart was 100%spot on a few weeks back also about who and what a patriot is.

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, KDIGGZ said:

 

This article underlines the significant discrepancy between a property's assessed value, appraised value, and its actual selling price. It's not the same.

 

Trump faced fraud charges for intentionally and consistently misvaluing assets across 23 different properties and other assets. This was done to persuade banks to lend to the Trump Organization on more favorable terms.

 

From 2011-2021, Mr. Trump and the Trump Organization knowingly and intentionally created more than 200 false and misleading valuations of assets on his annual Statements of Financial Condition to defraud financial institutions.

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

This article underlines the significant discrepancy between a property's assessed value, appraised value, and its actual selling price. It's not the same.

 

Trump faced fraud charges for intentionally and consistently misvaluing assets across 23 different properties and other assets. This was done to persuade banks to lend to the Trump Organization on more favorable terms.

 

From 2011-2021, Mr. Trump and the Trump Organization knowingly and intentionally created more than 200 false and misleading valuations of assets on his annual Statements of Financial Condition to defraud financial institutions.

 

Yes but the point is everybody does that because we all think our stuff is worth more than they may say it is and when you do that it's up to the bank to send an appraiser to check. Are you calling the appraiser a liar?

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, KDIGGZ said:

Yes but the point is everybody does that because we all think our stuff is worth more than they may say it is and when you do that it's up to the bank to send an appraiser to check. Are you calling the appraiser a liar?

Not everybody does it.

 

 And of course they went after him. Not because of politics but because he is a dick. I’m sure they wanted to go after him for years and finally had something to go on. He’s from New York they are from New York they hate him just like most New Yorkers. The lesson, don’t be a dick!

  • Eyeroll 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">OMG!! I&#39;ve been caught doing something not remotely similar to Trump! I guess all I need to do now is start a fraud college, steal classified docs, bankrupt casinos, pay hush money, grab pussies, discriminate in housing, cheat at golf and foment insurrection and you&#39;ll revere me!</p>&mdash; Jon Stewart (@jonstewart) 

Edited by 4th&long
  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, KDIGGZ said:

Yes but the point is everybody does that because we all think our stuff is worth more than they may say it is and when you do that it's up to the bank to send an appraiser to check. Are you calling the appraiser a liar?

 

John listed his property for sale, and someone purchased it at the asking price. No one compelled the market to accept the value he placed on the property.

 

Does John have a track record of deliberately and regularly mispricing his assets across his real estate portfolio? If so, he should also face prosecution.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tommy Callahan said:

 

 

 

The interesting part about this story to me is just how badly the city underestimated the value of the property, and by extension, the tax this very wealthy celebrity paid.  With the real estate boom, it’s understandable that some properties would raise faster than a reasonable reassessment could address, but missing by $16,000,000 on an $18,000,000 sale? 
 

 It makes you wonder if the city gives de facto tax breaks to residents of wealthy enclaves, or individuals in some cases.  
 

It also raises the question of the ability of the city to accurately or reasonably assess valuations to begin with.   Is the undervaluation of properties systemic, intentional or a reflection of incompetence?  
 

Finally, Mr. Stewart apparently benefited from a tax windfall, and nothing would preclude him for making things right and cutting a check to make up at least some of the difference.  One would assume the lost tax revenue goes toward paying for valuable services for the community as a whole, especially those less fortunate.  The phrase “fair share” comes to mind. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tommy Callahan said:

 

 

 

So this is about the sale of a penthouse? That is literally the free market society we live in! Thank you for clearing this up. I thought Stewart had some explaining to do Monday night on his show. Now it’s must see tv.

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, 4th&amp;long said:

So this is about the sale of a penthouse? That is literally the free market society we live in! Thank you for clearing this up. I thought Stewart had some explaining to do Monday night on his show. Now it’s must see tv.

It's about pointing out the hypocrisy of one being charged.  The other one being defended.  

 

For the same damn thing. 

 

It's all good.  Obama, Hillary and Biden are in NYC today to get millions from NYC elite 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...