Jump to content

1512(c)(2) Impeding an official proceeding


Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

Impeding an official proceeding caught on video.

 

Straight to the DC gulag?

 

:lol: right.

 

 

 

Hmmm then maybe they shouldn't have let spectators into a proceeding that they know has a bunch of people protesting. 🤷‍♂️

Totally see the similarities though I mean other than being allowed to be there at the start and just sitting until they started yelling their message, and only yelling their message while then peacefully following police instructions and following them out. But you know besides that exactly the same thing.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, JaCrispy said:

A spade is a spade…it doesn’t say you can’t interrupt proceedings only on certain days…let’s keep it real…👍

Man Slaughter is not premeditated murder 

 

Degrees, shades of grey, outright difference...

 

I mean, it don't fit

 

image.png.48f237b1483046d0f7081008fcc6af09.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

Man Slaughter is not premeditated murder 

 

Degrees, shades of grey, outright difference...

 

I mean, it don't fit

 

image.png.48f237b1483046d0f7081008fcc6af09.png

Correct…but the law they used to prosecute J6 protesters does not differentiate…You can feel however you want, but the law must be followed, and equally applied to all…👍

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

At the same time Sen Lankford wants to give DC federal judges control over our immigration system, the courthouse is bracing for a major sh*tshow--in fact, it already is--if SCOTUS reverses an appellate court decision on DOJ's application of 1512c2, obstruction of an official proceeding.

 

Every judge except one (Nichols) refused to dismiss the post-Enron law DOJ slapped against 320+ J6ers and Donald Trump.

 

But since SCOTUS granted cert in December, some judges have released a few from prison, delayed sentencing and trials for others, and urged DOJ to seek plea deals on other counts. (This is Judge Beryl Howell, former chief judge, during a hearing a few days after SCOTUS took the case.)

 

It is impossible to overstate just what a black eye this will be for the entire DC district court, the DC US attorney's office, and the entire DOJ if SCOTUS overturns how DOJ used the statute.

 

These are the same judges Lankford and others want to empower in deciding the "constitutionality" of his alleged immigration bill.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...