Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, John from Riverside said:

That’s rich
redstate.com total joke

IT was the text of the bill of rights.  

 

but understand you find that to be a joke and a problem.

 

 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I'm sure he will abide by the 25th Amendment just like he accepted his defeat in 2020

 

https://www.salon.com/2022/07/22/trumps-2025-plan-includes-a-nightmare-list-of-cabinet-picks--and-purge-of-career-officials-report/

Former President Donald Trump's top allies are preparing to purge potentially thousands of career civil servants and install MAGA loyalists in key administration positions if he wins the 2024 presidential election, according to Axios.

Trumpworld is already lining up names of loyalists to fill top jobs if Trump returns to the White House in 2025, including former Justice Department official Jeffrey Clark, who tried to take over the DOJ to help Trump overturn his election loss. Other names for top administration roles include Kash Patel, a former top aide to ex-Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., who helped run interference in the Mueller probe; former adviser Peter Navarro, who played a key role in pushing Trump's Big Lie about the election; and Stephen Miller, the architect of Trump's controversial family separation policy.

But Trump's allies aren't just thinking about the top jobs — they're also plotting a purge of career civil servants by radically overhauling labor protections for tens of thousands of career officials. The plan appears similar to one pushed by Ginni Thomas, the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, who made detailed lists of disloyal officials to oust during Trump's tenure.

Posted

Salon and old hearsay Hutchinson.

 

LMAO.  smells of desperation.

 

Salon is using fear to prevent political change.

 

Doesn't terrorism involve violence, or the threat of violence for political gain?

 

 

Posted
4 hours ago, Tommy Callahan said:

Salon and old hearsay Hutchinson.

 

LMAO.  smells of desperation.

 

Salon is using fear to prevent political change.

 

Doesn't terrorism involve violence, or the threat of violence for political gain?

 

 


Correct, as it was on January 6. Glad you’re finally catching up 

Posted
19 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


Correct, as it was on January 6. Glad you’re finally catching up 

yes.  the usual voices used a lot of propaganda to scare people into voting for the establishment.

 

 

 

 

Posted
17 hours ago, Tommy Callahan said:

yes.  the usual voices used a lot of propaganda to scare people into voting for the establishment.

 

 

 

 


Hoax 

 

This POS did it all by himself 

 

giphy.gif?cid=2154d3d7zzt8xo86saohdn4d83

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 1 year later...
Posted (edited)
21 minutes ago, Albwan said:

I don't want autocracy I just want lefty wankers to piss off.

What we had under Biden was the permanent Washington beauracracy making presidential decisions instead of the crash dummy fake President. That seems autocratic, and i dare say a coup.. Unelected, nameless, unidentified someone's hiding in the shadows acting as President. Let's find out who they where and arrest them all for treason.

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
Posted
9 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

What we had under Biden was the permanent Washington beauracracy making presidential decisions instead of the crash dummy fake President. That seems autocratic, and i dare say a coup.. Unelected, nameless, unidentified someone's hiding in the shadows acting as President. Let's find out who they where and arrest them all for treason.

Yeah, but that doesn’t count. Because the leftists know what’s good for you.

Posted
6 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

What we had under Biden was the permanent Washington beauracracy making presidential decisions instead of the crash dummy fake President. That seems autocratic, and i dare say a coup.. Unelected, nameless, unidentified someone's hiding in the shadows acting as President. Let's find out who they where and arrest them all for treason.

 

If unelected bureaucrats quietly making decisions is the problem, then that’s an issue with how our government functions and it’s been that way across all administrations, Republican and Democrat.

 

But let’s be real: MAGA constantly needs a conspiracy to explain the world, because facing their actual track record - from policy failures to indictments to chaos - is too uncomfortable.

 

So, they invent shadow governments, stolen elections, and “deep states” to avoid taking accountability.

 

It’s not patriotism. It’s deflection.

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Homelander said:

 

If unelected bureaucrats quietly making decisions is the problem, then that’s an issue with how our government functions and it’s been that way across all administrations, Republican and Democrat.

 

But let’s be real: MAGA constantly needs a conspiracy to explain the world, because facing their actual track record - from policy failures to indictments to chaos - is too uncomfortable.

 

So, they invent shadow governments, stolen elections, and “deep states” to avoid taking accountability.

 

It’s not patriotism. It’s deflection.

It's about disengaging the average brain from serious thought.  If they can break up a formulating argument in its genesis, it's unlikely going to reinsert itself into the public conscienceness.  they're well studied on human declining independent thought.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

It's about disengaging the average brain from serious thought.  If they can break up a formulating argument in its genesis, it's unlikely going to reinsert itself into the public conscienceness.  they're well studied on human declining independent thought.

 

Exactly - it's not just about distraction, it's about preemptive disruption. If you can keep people constantly reacting instead of thinking, you never have to confront real questions.

 

The system thrives on noise, not substance and the less independently people think, the easier it is to sell them the illusion of choice.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, Homelander said:

 

Exactly - it's not just about distraction, it's about preemptive disruption. If you can keep people constantly reacting instead of thinking, you never have to confront real questions.

 

The system thrives on noise, not substance and the less independently people think, the easier it is to sell them the illusion of choice.

It's all about breaking lines.  For instance, unqualified, useless "journalists" who have no idea how to access and divulge crucial info even if they knew where to find it vs those trained to do just that, equalizing inferior intellect's  superior ones.  In the same way, the public has begun to respect the opinions of midlevel medical practitioners with those of well established quality .  

 

We are being trained to accept less for the same cost.  

 

This is R mantra these days.

,

  • Agree 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

We are being trained to accept less for the same cost.  

 

 

See, that’s the problem - it drives all the MAGA cultists insane. They blindly swallow everything Trump, Elon, or whatever the latest right-wing hero spits out, no matter how ridiculous, as long as it glorifies MAGA.

 

And the moment you call them out? They completely lose it. Screaming for bans and censorship because they’re fragile as hell and can’t handle anything that doesn’t come wrapped in their propaganda.

 

Just look at the fools scrambling to clean up Elon Musk’s drug-fueled mess.

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...