Jump to content

Previous And Ongoing Election Rigging and Interference.


Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, BillsFanNC said:

Wait, the Intercept reported this?

 

:lol:

 

 

Once again we see the same play being run:

 

deny something is happening,

mock and belittle those who say it's happening,

wait until enough time has passed,

then admit what you denied happened really happened. 

 

 

 

But remember, if you suggest this in real time -

 

you're a nut, a conspiracy theorist, a Nazi,  a Putin Stooge, or whatever enemy of the moment is in the zeitgeist. 

 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

🎯 🎯 🎯 

 

Remember 2020 when a much less demented Biden barely left his basement, and when he did it was to crowds of eight people?

 

That didn't worry democrats in the least because they knew that they had everything rigged.

 

Same thing in 2024. Only difference is Biden is fully demented this time around.  They still don't care because they've got it all handled.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Elon Musk Breaks Down How Democrats Use Illegal Immigration to Rig Elections in Their Favor

 by Ben Kew

 

Tesla CEO and X owner Elon Musk has revealed how the Democratic Party uses illegal immigration to rig the electoral system in its favor. Posting on his X platform, Musk responded to the news that Democrats in the Senate had unaninamously voted down an amendment to stop illegal aliens from being counted in apportionment for congressional districts and the Electoral College. He explained: Most Americans do not know that the US census currently counts, for purposes of voting power, all people in a district, regardless of citizenship! Senate Democrats just voted unanimously to defeat an amendment

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/03/elon-musk-breaks-down-how-democrats-use-illegal/

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • BillsFanNC changed the title to Previous And Ongoing Election Rigging and Interference. "Undocumented Migrants" are ILLEGAL ALIENS
4 hours ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MdAyn89hFIo

 

How far the democrats have come in 15 years. I agree with almost everything none other than Chuck Schumer said in 2009. In these 2 minutes he uses the word illegal 10 times. Some highlights:

"Illegal immigration is wrong, plain and simple."

"Illegal aliens should not be treated the same as people who enter the US legally."

"When we use phrases like undocumented workers we convey a message to the American people that their government is not serious about combating illegal immigration. If you don't think it is illegal you're not going to say it. I think it is illegal and wrong."

  • Thank you (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fall of 2024 is going to be an absolute mess.  2020= child's play.  Be prepared.

 

It's been over a week since Super Tuesday. California's Senate Open Primary and Special Open Primary election races are still ongoing.

 

What was once Election Day has become Election Months.

 

Enough is enough.

 

Argentina held a run-off election with in-person voting, voter IDs, and all paper ballots and got the results within one day. Millions of votes. Documented. Verified. Auditable. Indisputable. ONE DAY.

 

California has universal mail-in votes with zero verification of voter eligibility. Millions of illegal aliens reside in the state. And the state's election results are suspect to say the least.

 

During the Schiff-Garvey race, observers have detected reporting that appeared to subtract votes from Republican Steve Garvey. Both Schiff and Garvey are running in the two Senate races. One is a full term, while the other replaces the seat of late Senator Dianne Feinstein.

 

Regardless of the actual tallying in California, the *reporting* of vote flips — independently verified by several elections observers — invariably benefiting Democrats, undermines voter confidence in results.

 

The statistical odds of Schiff and Garvey remaining within a fraction of one percent for going on ten days are between slim and none.

 

We're being conditioned to expect every single Democrat candidate to pull off narrow, miraculous wins weeks after the "election."

 

Americans have had enough of the games. We need election integrity, not the non-existent right of "voter convenience."

 

Voter IDs. Paper ballots. One day of voting.

 

This is what voters demand to ensure that elections represent the will of the American people.

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BillsFanNC said:

Fall of 2024 is going to be an absolute mess.  2020= child's play.  Be prepared.

 

It's been over a week since Super Tuesday. California's Senate Open Primary and Special Open Primary election races are still ongoing.

 

What was once Election Day has become Election Months.

 

Enough is enough.

 

Argentina held a run-off election with in-person voting, voter IDs, and all paper ballots and got the results within one day. Millions of votes. Documented. Verified. Auditable. Indisputable. ONE DAY.

 

California has universal mail-in votes with zero verification of voter eligibility. Millions of illegal aliens reside in the state. And the state's election results are suspect to say the least.

 

During the Schiff-Garvey race, observers have detected reporting that appeared to subtract votes from Republican Steve Garvey. Both Schiff and Garvey are running in the two Senate races. One is a full term, while the other replaces the seat of late Senator Dianne Feinstein.

 

Regardless of the actual tallying in California, the *reporting* of vote flips — independently verified by several elections observers — invariably benefiting Democrats, undermines voter confidence in results.

 

The statistical odds of Schiff and Garvey remaining within a fraction of one percent for going on ten days are between slim and none.

 

We're being conditioned to expect every single Democrat candidate to pull off narrow, miraculous wins weeks after the "election."

 

Americans have had enough of the games. We need election integrity, not the non-existent right of "voter convenience."

 

Voter IDs. Paper ballots. One day of voting.

 

This is what voters demand to ensure that elections represent the will of the American people.

 

 

Officials such as AG Garland are on record as opposing any voter ID requirements because they allege such requirements disenfranchise minorities.  Without ever explaining how or why.

But what about other government requirements for identification?  Don't they also disenfranchise minorities consistent with proposed voter ID laws?  Such as TSA requirements for passengers at airports to present valid identification documents?  Doesn't that relegate minorities who find it impossible, as the AG claims, to get a valid ID to ground transportation options?  Why isn't that racist? 

What people opposing voter ID laws (supported by huge majorities of Democrats, Republicans, and Independents) don't say is such requirements inhibit cheating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

SCOTUS Findings Include Not 1, Not 2, but 3 'BOMBSHELL' Developments Showing HOW Elections Can Be Rigged

FTA:

 

In a unanimous per curiam opinion, the three-judge panel determined that the suit contained an excessive number of hypotheticals that required proof. These hypotheticals included establishing security breaches in the election equipment, showing that the vulnerabilities were exploited, and proving that the security breaches affected the outcome of the election.

 

Lake and Finchem submitted a 210-page petition to the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday, alleging that the chaos that transpired on Election Day in Maricopa County on account of erroneously certified vote tabulation machines prior to the 2022 election is a direct consequence of newly discovered evidence to that effect.

 

“Newly uncovered evidence also shows Arizona’s Maricopa County flagrantly violated state law for electronic voting systems—including using altered software not certified for use in Arizona — and actively misrepresented and concealed those violations,” the court filing said.

 

Here's the biggie:

 

“As a result, there is no way to know what the true outcome of the votes in those voting centers are, nor the total votes for the entire election,” he noted.

Maricopa County, Arizona election auditor Benjamin R. Cotton testified that “It is clear, based on my findings, that unauthorized programs, databases, configuration settings and actions were present on the voting systems in Maricopa County for the elections in both 2020 and 2022.”

 

https://thepoliticsbrief.com/scotus-filing-contains-three-bombshell-developments-that-show-how-arizonas-elections-can-be-rigged/

 

 

.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...