Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, boyst said:

So what you're saying is the GOP got all the rednecks riled up? Or is it all of the GOP is a bunch of rednecks? Or is everyone that went on January 6th a gop? Or is it everybody on January 6th is a redneck? 

 

First off let's stop lumping everybody together...

 

The rest is your perception, and that's okay. Some people just aren't as smart as other people. It just because you're still learning it's not a bad thing, keep it up buddy. I really hope that one day you can advance to the big boy table, because eventually you'll end up where the men sit. 

 

Because that's the point, disagree on perception and opinion all you want but then lumping everyone together is the biggest part of the problem. Maturity is to overcome that. 

 

I've seen you lump anybody here that's a republican in with some sort of maga Trump supporter who said January 6th was a great thing. I get it, you're outside your abilities or tapping the very best you can of intelligence but do some self-reflection to realize it's not an US versus them, you versus anyone. We're all the same.

i never mentioned the gop.  i think specifically trump riled people up by telling them the election was stolen.  that group at the capitOl was a bunch of redneck proud boys...not the gop.  there is a certain group that blindly follows trump, (i get these people exist on both sides) and when he says dangerous things like an election was rigged, they react without thought or reason.  show me once where i lumped one group with the other.

 

and with the big boy intelligence *****...come on.  we've all read some of your posts, i'd think strong and hard calling someone unintelligent just because they don't agree with your opinion.  i have four year of college, four year of grad school, and another year of post grad under my belt.  i know that high school degree makes you feel special, but no.

Posted

2002: The Carter/Baker commission: The best way to minimize voter fraud is to minimize mail in voting to only those qualified for absentee ballots, and the method in place should be rigorous.

 

2020: Ballots puked out everywhere. 43% of ballots were mailed in. The most ever in an election BY FAR.

 

Conclusion: the 2020 election was the most secure election in US history.

 

😂

  • Disagree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, teef said:

i never mentioned the gop.  i think specifically trump riled people up by telling them the election was stolen.  that group at the capitOl was a bunch of redneck proud boys...not the gop.  there is a certain group that blindly follows trump, (i get these people exist on both sides) and when he says dangerous things like an election was rigged, they react without thought or reason.  show me once where i lumped one group with the other.

 

and with the big boy intelligence *****...come on.  we've all read some of your posts, i'd think strong and hard calling someone unintelligent just because they don't agree with your opinion.  i have four year of college, four year of grad school, and another year of post grad under my belt.  i know that high school degree makes you feel special, but no.

Perhaps you've only seen the BBC News edit. I know many here see bbc and get excited because they know their browser history ... But it's also a news source out of the UK which edited the hell out of Trump's clip. The US media the same thing. 

 

Either way you're living in a paradigm, living in a lie, full of *****. I don't know which one but you can decide. Because you're saying this on one side of your mouth shaking your head yes while the other side of your mouth is going back, maybe to that BBC stuff, and shaking your head yes when Nancy pelosi, Chuck schumer, Maxine waters, many of them said we need to fight like hell, we need to punch them in the face, we need to be violent. 

 

So here you are upset that Trump riled up people that attacked the capitol. Your words. 

 

But when it comes time to call out violence against people who disagree with you, your liberal ideations, Che guevara, whatever commie bastard you're into ... Well I don't see you saying much? In fact I think I saw you say something about Charlie Kirk being only a YouTuber, and being fairly light on the whole stance there. 

 

So yeah, you're just a douchebag hypocrite. 

Posted
23 minutes ago, boyst said:

Perhaps you've only seen the BBC News edit. I know many here see bbc and get excited because they know their browser history ... But it's also a news source out of the UK which edited the hell out of Trump's clip. The US media the same thing. 

 

Either way you're living in a paradigm, living in a lie, full of *****. I don't know which one but you can decide. Because you're saying this on one side of your mouth shaking your head yes while the other side of your mouth is going back, maybe to that BBC stuff, and shaking your head yes when Nancy pelosi, Chuck schumer, Maxine waters, many of them said we need to fight like hell, we need to punch them in the face, we need to be violent. 

 

So here you are upset that Trump riled up people that attacked the capitol. Your words. 

 

But when it comes time to call out violence against people who disagree with you, your liberal ideations, Che guevara, whatever commie bastard you're into ... Well I don't see you saying much? In fact I think I saw you say something about Charlie Kirk being only a YouTuber, and being fairly light on the whole stance there. 

 

So yeah, you're just a douchebag hypocrite. 

Read what you just wrote.  This is childish crash out nonsense. Take a pill, take a walk, go to the gym, or do whatever it is you have to do to calm down.  I never mentioned anything about Kirk other than I was sorry for his family. You’re firing on all cylinders right now, so take a deep breath and count to 10.  The adults are talking.  

Posted
2 hours ago, teef said:

Read what you just wrote.  This is childish crash out nonsense. Take a pill, take a walk, go to the gym, or do whatever it is you have to do to calm down.  I never mentioned anything about Kirk other than I was sorry for his family. You’re firing on all cylinders right now, so take a deep breath and count to 10.  The adults are talking.  

lol trust me, i'm not firing on all cyinders to type that much fire. i could juggle fire with the other hand and ride a unicycle. this level of spice is just a talnet

Posted

Ouch. Massie wrecked.

 

And although not specifically calling out the Blaze reporting, he's throwing water on it.

 

Congressman Massie,
When Director Patel and I entered on duty in our leadership positions in the FBI we had our hands full, but we were happy to be part of the President’s team, and we still are. 


Despite the multitude of challenges we faced, one of our first initiatives was to aggressively pursue a new strategy to investigate the January 6 pipe bomb, terror attack. We brought in new personnel to take a look at the case, we flew in police officers and detectives working as TFOs (task force officers) to review FBI work, we conducted multiple internal reviews, held countless in person and SVTC meetings with investigative team members, we dramatically increased investigative resources, and we increased the public award for information in the case to utilize crowd-sourcing leads. 


This is only a small sample of the work the FBI personnel and leadership team have put into this critical investigation. 
When I spoke with you yesterday a little after 8am ET (screenshots attached), I offered you an in-person brief on our work. We spoke for ten minutes. 


I called you back a bit after 7:30pm ET to again make that offer. You didn’t answer and have yet to call me back. 
Despite this, you continue to imply that the Director and I are targeting investigators in the case. This is disgusting, even by the low standards many have for politicians. You know my number, and you’re free to call me anytime. But it’s easier to tweet and throw BS bombs. 


Yes, our leadership team will be meeting with FBI team members today, and we will avail them of all the whistleblower resources they need to disclose ANY evidence of malfeasance in the prior administration. And we will ask about threads that may have gone un-pulled under prior leadership, because we are passionate about solving this case.
But a week of near 24-hour work on RECENT open source leads in the case has yet to produce a break through, and some of the media reporting regarding prior persons of interest is grossly inaccurate and serves only to mislead the public. 


I proudly serve in this administration, and I proudly work with Director Patel to reform and advance the crime fighting and national security missions of the FBI. We would love to have you as a partner in this mission, rather than a dog barking behind a fence.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...