BillsFanNC Posted November 8 Author Posted November 8 (edited) 4 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said: Well, I’m waiting … 💤 Missed it by that much.... 😂 Edited November 8 by BillsFanNC
BillsFanNC Posted November 8 Author Posted November 8 (edited) "That's just a coincidence." - Finding The FBI, which failed to solve the case in nearly five years of investigation but indicated that it was closing in after Blaze News brought its investigation to intelligence sources, was feet from the Falls Church address of the pipe bomb suspect days after Jan. 6, according to the Blaze News investigation. Former FBI Special Agent Kyle Seraphin realized Friday that he was doing surveillance next door to the woman now suspected of being the Jan. 6 pipe bomber. “The FBI put us one door away from the pipe bomber within days of January 6, and we were deliberately pulled away for no logical or logically investigative reason,” Seraphin told Blaze News Friday. “And everything about that tells me that they were involved in a cover-up and have been since day one. "They were f**king in on it,” Seraphin said. Edited November 8 by BillsFanNC
BillsFanNC Posted November 8 Author Posted November 8 Did she open the doors from the inside on J6 as well?
The Frankish Reich Posted November 8 Posted November 8 "Gait Match" = spurious 94-97% accuracy. Yeah. Gait Match.
JDHillFan Posted November 8 Posted November 8 8 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: "Gait Match" = spurious 94-97% accuracy. Yeah. Gait Match. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3925574/ Sounded made up in 2014 when this was published back in the Obama era, didn’t it? I think there have been advances in technology since then that may have made it more of a thing. you DO NOT want this case solved, do you
The Frankish Reich Posted November 8 Posted November 8 Just now, JDHillFan said: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3925574/ Sounded made up in 2014 when this was published back in the Obama era, didn’t it? I think there have been advances in technology since then that may have made it more of a thing. you DO NOT want this case solved, do you Here's what I see. Capitol Hill cop testifies against leading "3 percenter" and obviously guilty Guy Reffitt. (Just take a quick look at his own statements) Glenn Beck and his crack team of "gait analysts" compare some tiny sample of the cop's "gait" to video of person leaving pipe bomb under a bench. Glenn Beck issues spurious "conclusion" that there is a 94-97% chance that cop is the pipe bomb suspect in the video. This is actually libel/slander against the cop.
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted November 8 Posted November 8 11 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: "Gait Match" = spurious 94-97% accuracy. Yeah. Gait Match. I would think that a gait match of 94-97% has all the hallmarks of proof that some intelligence operatives may have been involved. Now, seriously, I know a guy who sold his security business quite a few years ago. Prior to selling, he was telling me that they were working on some “very high-tech CSI” information including body language analysis. He did not mention gate analysis. I’ll wait and see, and don’t see these guys as the final source of truth and justice (in line with other media types) but I would not be surprised in the least.
The Frankish Reich Posted November 8 Posted November 8 4 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: I would think that a gait match of 94-97% has all the hallmarks of proof that some intelligence operatives may have been involved. I would say it's more likely that someone in Trump law enforcement is trying to get revenge against someone who testified against his J6 rioters by feeding bs to Glenn Beck.
Orlando Buffalo Posted November 8 Posted November 8 23 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: "Gait Match" = spurious 94-97% accuracy. Yeah. Gait Match. Are you telling me you can't tell your wife from behind by the way she walks? Seriously this is not some crazy new thought. It was in the MI move like a decade ago. 1
The Frankish Reich Posted November 8 Posted November 8 2 minutes ago, Orlando Buffalo said: Are you telling me you can't tell your wife from behind by the way she walks? Seriously this is not some crazy new thought. It was in the MI move like a decade ago. I am telling you it is completely unreliable. Think about the error. First of all, why did Glenn Beck decide to compare the pipe bomber to this particular cop and not to the thousands of others in and around the J6 protests? Did he compare the gait to any of them? If so, how many? In other words, it's a Seek and Ye Shall Find mini-dragnet with a sample size (as far as we know) of one. Second, who did the "gait analysis?" Any indication of whether it has been shown to be accurate in controlled studies? Where does the bs precise "94-97%" come from? Are they saying that even when it dings "match" there's a 3 in 100 to 6 in 100 chance that it wasn't the subject? This is no "breakthrough" or anything that would resemble sufficient evidence to even get a search warrant, much less to publicly accuse someone of a crime. There's a lot of crap in Mission Impossible movies. Maybe you shouldn't believe everything Tom Cruise does in movies.
Recommended Posts