B-Man Posted March 2 Share Posted March 2 Reminder: 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted March 2 Author Share Posted March 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 2 Share Posted March 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 https://www.theonion.com/clarence-thomas-announces-50-discount-on-all-favorable-1851282570 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 (edited) 2 hours ago, Kemp said: https://www.theonion.com/clarence-thomas-announces-50-discount-on-all-favorable-1851282570 On 8/12/2023 at 12:10 AM, B-Man said: This IS very simple. Is there ANY shred of evidence that Justice Thomas has ever changed ANY Supreme Court decision because of outside influences ? or has he done as he always has , brilliantly outlined the constitutional originalism that got him on the court in the first place. NO ? Then keep your whining about gifts to yourself or at the very least admit that you are applying a standard to Thomas that you don’t to others that you favor. Edited March 4 by B-Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 2 hours ago, B-Man said: The primary argument isn't whether or not he altered a decision. It's that he has taken multiple, very large donations from someone for no logical reason. Why do you believe a Supreme Court is getting millions of dollars from someone? Ya think it's love? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 2 hours ago, Kemp said: The primary argument isn't whether or not he altered a decision. It's that he has taken multiple, very large donations from someone for no logical reason. Why do you believe a Supreme Court is getting millions of dollars from someone? Ya think it's love? Ya think he's taking donations. . . . . . . . . . . . . and NOT altering his decisions ? Boy those 'doners' must be as stupid as you guys here. Meanwhile: He's always been a petty, small man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 16 hours ago, B-Man said: Ya think he's taking donations. . . . . . . . . . . . . and NOT altering his decisions ? Boy those 'doners' must be as stupid as you guys here. Meanwhile: He's always been a petty, small man. Donations? You think Supreme Court judges get donations? YOU just admitted that a Supreme Court judge has repeately broken the law of accepting millions of dollars and never reported it for tax purposes. If you did that, you'd likely go to prison. That's the guy you're defending. Further proof that you will defend any crime committed as long as it helps your wannabe dictator. You have zero ethics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted March 19 Author Share Posted March 19 👆 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted March 20 Author Share Posted March 20 It's a small world after all... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted March 28 Author Share Posted March 28 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted April 12 Author Share Posted April 12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted April 12 Author Share Posted April 12 When you have nothing to hide you comply Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted April 13 Author Share Posted April 13 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted April 16 Author Share Posted April 16 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted April 17 Share Posted April 17 Where's Clarence? Guilt getting the better of his corrupt azz? https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-clarence-thomas-absent-abea8082774900c15766c4c7dd3398e6 WASHINGTON (AP) — Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was absent from the court Monday with no explanation. Thomas, 75, also was not participating remotely in arguments, as justices sometimes do when they are ill or otherwise can’t be there in person. Chief Justice John Roberts announced Thomas’ absence, saying that his colleague would still participate in the day’s cases, based on the briefs and transcripts of the arguments. The court sometimes, but not always, says when a justice is out sick. Thomas was hospitalized two years ago with an infection, causing him to miss several court sessions. He took part in the cases then, too. He is the longest serving of the current justices, joining the Supreme Court in 1991. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted April 17 Share Posted April 17 The mob attacks the third branch of the Co equal branches of governance. Seems to be race based as well. Not a good look. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted Friday at 02:55 AM Author Share Posted Friday at 02:55 AM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted Friday at 11:57 AM Share Posted Friday at 11:57 AM So corrupt. Best judge right wing activist money can buy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted 33 minutes ago Author Share Posted 33 minutes ago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts