ScotSHO Posted November 7 Posted November 7 On 10/30/2025 at 8:15 PM, BillsFanNC said: Roundy? Not a lefty - they would never admit defeat. 1
nedboy7 Posted November 7 Posted November 7 He explains perfectly how the GOP has to now deal with far right ideology they allowed to fester. Like Nick Fuentes and his interview with Tucker. 1
Orlando Buffalo Posted November 8 Posted November 8 7 hours ago, nedboy7 said: He explains perfectly how the GOP has to now deal with far right ideology they allowed to fester. Like Nick Fuentes and his interview with Tucker. It is always hilarious when people like you think you have a gotcha like this after you guys allowed BLM and their ilk to be openly racist for a decade demonizing white people. I don't like Fuentes but he is a mild version of the stuff you allowed to fester. 1
B-Man Posted Wednesday at 04:02 PM Posted Wednesday at 04:02 PM Former Rolling Stone Editor Says the Dems’ Illegal Orders Stunt Reminds Him of Another Hoax. Former Rolling Stone editor Matt Taibbi is critical of the conservative movement, but he seems to be mostly fending off attacks from his side of the aisle. Despite being a dyed-in-the-wool liberal—that’s not enough for today’s Democratic base which is unspooled. Taibbi was an original Russian collusion skeptic on the Left, which didn’t earn him much praise from his side, but his writings against the censorship complex, which included Twitter, has mostly been directed at Democrats. Look, the man calls balls and strikes; he’s fair. But in today’s liberal circles, that’s one step removed from full-blown neo-Nazism. That said, Taibbi is not having any of the ‘don’t follow Trump’s illegal orders’ nonsense, calling it another shoddy propaganda ploy by the Democrats that reeks of the Russian collusion hoax It's such blatant, bad, overwrought propaganda ... It reminds me again of the beginning of Russiagate when there were all these leaks about encouraging people not to share intelligence with the United States. That made Trump look bad, but it also made the United States look weak and vulnerable and sent the signal that the country was in schism and maybe the government was not stable. Is that what they're trying to project? I mean, is that right? I don't think so. Oh, and trust me—this whole debacle has been a circus. If you can’t answer a simple question, like which illegal order are you referring to without crumbling, it’s a narrative that’s beyond unseriousness. Also, no one cares because voters know it’s total crap. https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2025/11/25/former-rolling-stone-editor-says-the-dems-illegal-orders-stunt-reminds-him-of-another-hoax-n2666870 1
BillsFanNC Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 25 minutes ago, Walking Tall said: So what? We can point to exact same stuff happening anecdotally in schools circa 2005. Besides, it's not my kids at that school anyway. Meh. - teef
Delete_Delete_Delete Posted 48 minutes ago Posted 48 minutes ago On 11/27/2025 at 1:33 PM, B-Man said: I think what she wants is bodily autonomy, and she’s illustrating that these are the lengths they must go through to do so. I don’t think she’s going door to door handing out wire hangers or anything, she just wants the freedom for women to govern their own bodies. It sounds unsafe, but let’s not make this something it clearly isn’t- she’s not trying to sell the idea of at home abortions as a viable alternative, I mean the term “dystopian reality” kinda insinuates these are less than optimal choices to be presented with in the first place.
Recommended Posts