The Frankish Reich Posted Wednesday at 05:37 PM Posted Wednesday at 05:37 PM 7 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: I responded. Thank you for your timely interaction. Not so much a scold as one that simply reminds others of their past positions on matters. Normally reserved for egregious hypocrisy. Wouldn’t your time be better spent whining about a boycott that doesn’t align with your “progressive” beliefs? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_scold Thank you for proving that I hit the nail on the head!
JDHillFan Posted Wednesday at 05:45 PM Posted Wednesday at 05:45 PM 1 minute ago, The Frankish Reich said: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_scold Thank you for proving that I hit the nail on the head! Scold it is! We all have our roles here. Yours is know-it-all. Sometimes it goes awry. Think Canadian Mennonite distribution. Do you remember when you claimed the reason you repeatedly declared Joe Biden (of all people) as mentally fit for the presidency was because it was a binary choice for the office? Those two things were not remotely congruent. Very embarrassing. Most especially saying as much post-debate. What in the hell were you thinking? 1
The Frankish Reich Posted Thursday at 01:25 AM Posted Thursday at 01:25 AM 7 hours ago, JDHillFan said: it was a binary choice Old and Losing It vs. Old and Totally Off His Rocker.
JDHillFan Posted Thursday at 01:29 AM Posted Thursday at 01:29 AM Just now, The Frankish Reich said: Old and Losing It vs. Old and Totally Off His Rocker. Sorry. Nothing justifies watching the debate and declaring afterwards that Biden was mentally fit for the presidency. Delusional and embarrassing. You didn’t actually mean it but you couldn’t help yourself. Very weird.
The Frankish Reich Posted Thursday at 01:30 AM Posted Thursday at 01:30 AM Just now, JDHillFan said: Sorry. Nothing justifies watching the debate and declaring afterwards that Biden was mentally fit for the presidency. Delusional and embarrassing. You didn’t actually mean it but you couldn’t help yourself. Very weird. Bed time for me, time to hit the Med Bed for you.
JDHillFan Posted Thursday at 01:35 AM Posted Thursday at 01:35 AM 4 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: Bed time for me, time to hit the Med Bed for you. 7:30 mountain time. Impressive!
The Frankish Reich Posted Thursday at 01:38 AM Posted Thursday at 01:38 AM Just now, JDHillFan said: 7:30 mountain time. Impressive! Red Sox lost. Nothing to look forward to as I have zero confidence in the Reds. When I get a Med Bed of my very own I'm gonna advance it to 6:30 MDT. Really: you know Trump was so effin stupid he thought this was a thing. He wouldn't have quietly deleted it if he didn't.
JDHillFan Posted Thursday at 01:43 AM Posted Thursday at 01:43 AM 3 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: Red Sox lost. Nothing to look forward to as I have zero confidence in the Reds. When I get a Med Bed of my very own I'm gonna advance it to 6:30 MDT. Really: you know Trump was so effin stupid he thought this was a thing. He wouldn't have quietly deleted it if he didn't. Trump’s stupidity is unrelated to you declaring Joe Biden mentally fit - even after the debate. Why did you do that to yourself?
The Frankish Reich Posted Thursday at 01:43 AM Posted Thursday at 01:43 AM Just now, JDHillFan said: Trump’s stupidity is unrelated to you declaring Joe Biden mentally fit - even after the debate. Why did you do that to yourself? Fit enough. More fit than the other guy. Your turn: do you believe Trump is mentally fit today to serve out his term?
JDHillFan Posted Thursday at 01:46 AM Posted Thursday at 01:46 AM Just now, The Frankish Reich said: Fit enough. More fit than the other guy. Your turn: do you believe Trump is mentally fit today to serve out his term? That was never your contention. He wasn’t fit, you knew that to be the case, and decided to play the fool anyway. WEIRD.
The Frankish Reich Posted Thursday at 01:47 AM Posted Thursday at 01:47 AM Just now, JDHillFan said: That was never your contention. He wasn’t fit, you knew that to be the case, and decided to play the fool anyway. WEIRD. Well, so ... answer my question. Trump today: fit to serve until January 19, 2029?? Yes or no.
JDHillFan Posted Thursday at 01:51 AM Posted Thursday at 01:51 AM 1 minute ago, The Frankish Reich said: Well, so ... answer my question. Trump today: fit to serve until January 19, 2029?? Yes or no. I don’t take assignments but will answer your question if you can find a single instance of me being delusional about Trump the way you are about Biden. The search function is easy to use. I can walk you through it if you like.
The Frankish Reich Posted Thursday at 02:09 AM Posted Thursday at 02:09 AM 15 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: I don’t take assignments but will answer your question if you can find a single instance of me being delusional about Trump the way you are about Biden. The search function is easy to use. I can walk you through it if you like. Look, it's a simple Yes or No. It's not a trick question. I answered your Biden question, and I stand by my answer. I've explained my reasons, which you find risible. Fine. But at least I'm not scared of taking a clear position on a football forum. So will you do the same, or will you be like B-Man, who can't even say whether he thinks the FCC should try to shut down Kimmel. (Really, I'm not making this up. He's afraid to answer.)
JDHillFan Posted Thursday at 02:15 AM Posted Thursday at 02:15 AM Just now, The Frankish Reich said: Look, it's a simple Yes or No. It's not a trick question. I answered your Biden question, and I stand by my answer. I've explained my reasons, which you find risible. Fine. But at least I'm not scared of taking a clear position on a football forum. So will you do the same, or will you be like B-Man, who can't even say whether he thinks the FCC should try to shut down Kimmel. (Really, I'm not making this up. He's afraid to answer.) Yes. Absolutely risible. Also, the football forum is over there. I’ve made my thoughts on Trump rather clear along the way. No need for me to go the unbelievably absurd route that you took. That said, I suspect he won’t last four years. That’s shocking isn’t it?
B-Man Posted Thursday at 03:00 AM Posted Thursday at 03:00 AM 45 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: So will you do the same, or will you be like B-Man, who can't even say whether he thinks the FCC should try to shut down Kimmel. (Really, I'm not making this up. He's afraid to answer.) LOL. The Voice of Reason. I don't answer other posters "what about this" nonsense because I choose not to. I am too old to try and change the closed minds of those who openly admit that they don't even read the conservative articles that I post. (I'm not making this up, Frank has admitted this)
The Frankish Reich Posted Thursday at 03:43 AM Posted Thursday at 03:43 AM (edited) 1 hour ago, JDHillFan said: I’ve made my thoughts on Trump rather clear along the way. I'm sorry, I don't index all your thoughts. Saves a lot of brain capacity. So ... ... I take it you are saying he is fit to serve? I just mentioned I watched JD Vance's presser today. Impressive. A lot of bs, but impressive in delivering it in a convincing and (on the surface) logical, coherent manner. So he is clearer fitter than Trump. Surely you agree with that. Fitter means the other guy is less fit. I say so much less fit that he is unfit. See how this dissolves into the same thing? Fitter than. Fit enough by contemporary standards. Wildly unfit as compared to Adams and Jefferson. Not objectively "fit" or "unfit." Would be easier if you just answered Yes. Then I could ask you what the hell was going on when he posted the MedBed thing. Edited Thursday at 03:45 AM by The Frankish Reich
JDHillFan Posted Thursday at 08:11 AM Posted Thursday at 08:11 AM 4 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said: I'm sorry, I don't index all your thoughts. Saves a lot of brain capacity. So ... ... I take it you are saying he is fit to serve? I just mentioned I watched JD Vance's presser today. Impressive. A lot of bs, but impressive in delivering it in a convincing and (on the surface) logical, coherent manner. So he is clearer fitter than Trump. Surely you agree with that. Fitter means the other guy is less fit. I say so much less fit that he is unfit. See how this dissolves into the same thing? Fitter than. Fit enough by contemporary standards. Wildly unfit as compared to Adams and Jefferson. Not objectively "fit" or "unfit." Would be easier if you just answered Yes. Then I could ask you what the hell was going on when he posted the MedBed thing. You should pay more attention to what people’s general thoughts on politicians are here at a political subforum. Only a dozen people visit here so it shouldn’t be that hard. as to the rest of your post - absolute horseshit. An incredibly lame attempt to spin what you have said. There was never a “more fit” or “fitter than”. Your comments have been clear. I have catalogued them repeatedly. Joe Biden is mentally fit for the most important job in the world is what you said. Even after watching him bumble through the debate. A credible person in your position would have watched that abortion and said “good god, was I ever wrong about Biden’s mental fitness. I’m still voting for him because I hate Trump”. A non-credible person went with: On 7/18/2024 at 7:18 PM, The Frankish Reich said: Mentally fit for the job = yes.
Roundybout Posted Thursday at 02:32 PM Posted Thursday at 02:32 PM On 10/1/2025 at 10:26 AM, Royale with Cheese said: This is a random political thread. I was just asking you a question. My bad. Schaefer’s claim seems a little outlandish. This is from March, though, why bring it up now?
Recommended Posts