KRT88 Posted April 19, 2005 Share Posted April 19, 2005 Denvers acquires Washington's 3rd rounder (76th) and a 1st and 4th in 2006 Washington acquires Denver's 1st rounder (25th) just announced on ESPN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PromoTheRobot Posted April 19, 2005 Share Posted April 19, 2005 Could Washington be preparing to trade one of their #1's? PTR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frez Posted April 19, 2005 Share Posted April 19, 2005 Something is brewing.................. Broncos | First-round Pick Traded to Redskins - from www.KFFL.com Tue, 19 Apr 2005 15:55:07 -0700 The Denver Broncos have traded their 2005 first-round pick, No. 25 overall, to the Washington Redskins in exchange for three draft choices. The Redskins will send the Broncos their third-round draft choice (No. 76 overall) in the 2005 NFL Draft along with their first-round and fourth-round selections in the 2006 NFL Draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffBills#1 Posted April 19, 2005 Share Posted April 19, 2005 would u trade clements for the 25th pick?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mile High Posted April 19, 2005 Share Posted April 19, 2005 Nope, not enough leverage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffBills#1 Posted April 19, 2005 Share Posted April 19, 2005 Washington has to be the dumbest team of all time. I think everyone but themselves knows they're not going to be good next year so why trade next years first?? There is no chance Washington's first next year is going to be higher the 25th pick. Denver makes out great though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rico Posted April 19, 2005 Share Posted April 19, 2005 I might consider trading Nate for #9 & #25.... Meh, not enough, so he stays. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsGuyInMalta Posted April 19, 2005 Share Posted April 19, 2005 Ahhhh the Redskins...the classic example of how to do well in fan interest and yet maintain a poor product on the field. Things wont change this year either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mile High Posted April 19, 2005 Share Posted April 19, 2005 I might consider trading Nate for #9 & #25....Meh, not enough, so he stays. 309694[/snapback] I'm sure they would take the 9 in a heart beat, considering how rich the draft is with db's. I could see td and tm trading it away to acquire more picks in the 2nd and maybe even the 3rd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rico Posted April 19, 2005 Share Posted April 19, 2005 I could see td and tm trading it away to acquire more picks in the 2nd and maybe even the 3rd. 309700[/snapback] Trade an all-pro for a bunch of potential scrubs, oh boy.Or is that scrubs with potential. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted April 19, 2005 Share Posted April 19, 2005 Are you kidding? The rollercoaster would be barrelling down the tracks for the next 2 weeks if we'd made a deal like this. Oh, the humanity! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimBob2232 Posted April 19, 2005 Share Posted April 19, 2005 This makes NO sense....why would washington want to give up a whole lot to get the 25th pick when they have NO IDEA who is giong to be available there. why not wait until draft day? Odd...Good move by denver however Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mile High Posted April 19, 2005 Share Posted April 19, 2005 Trade an all-pro for a bunch of potential scrubs, oh boy.Or is that scrubs with potential. 309705[/snapback] Iment to trade down to the later part of the first round for a couple of picks in the later rounds. The fact is the bills won't be able to pay Clements what he's going to want next year so why not look into the future? Ya know what though, if you think about it there probably won't even be a trade with the Skins and the Bills to begin with. So what will we be stuck with when Nate leaves... Filling another hole. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rico Posted April 19, 2005 Share Posted April 19, 2005 Are you kidding? The rollercoaster would be barrelling down the tracks for the next 2 weeks if we'd made a deal like this. Oh, the humanity! 309706[/snapback] The days before the draft would be the best. All the draftniks heads' would explode. "Oh, the possibilities" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rico Posted April 19, 2005 Share Posted April 19, 2005 The fact is the bills won't be able to pay Clements what he's going to want next year 309710[/snapback] Sez who? TD? Ralph? I say MW leaves town before Nate does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mile High Posted April 19, 2005 Share Posted April 19, 2005 Sez who? TD? Ralph? 309714[/snapback] What does a top 5 shut down corner in the league average, money wise? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mile High Posted April 19, 2005 Share Posted April 19, 2005 Sez who? TD? Ralph? I say MW leaves town before Nate does. 309714[/snapback] You may be right about MW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rico Posted April 19, 2005 Share Posted April 19, 2005 What does a top 5 shut down corner in the league average, money wise? 309716[/snapback] About as much as a RT on the Bills. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mile High Posted April 19, 2005 Share Posted April 19, 2005 About as much as a RT on the Bills. 309718[/snapback] Right, and why the hell isn't he playing LT. I just don't get the philosophy behind that whole deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rico Posted April 19, 2005 Share Posted April 19, 2005 Right, and why the hell isn't he playing LT. I just don't get the philosophy behind that whole deal. 309720[/snapback] IF JMac can get MW to play at the same level of performance that Nate brings to the table, then I can see maybe keeping him instead, even at RT instead of LT. But right now, MW, though improved, can't touch Nate's value to our team, especially when you include the ST play. For his sake, MW better rework that contract if he wants to stay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts