GG Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 1 minute ago, SectionC3 said: So not debunked. And, contrary to your representation, also a “study.” Just not a clinical trial of the spectrum-wide efficacy of HCQ, in part because it considered patients with poor clinical outlooks. Which, I note, is perfectly consistent with what Cavuto said. If you’re in a vulnerable population, this is a bad plan and based on nothing other than a Trump fiction which people like GG credit based on the identity of the speaker. Along those lines, your point about Africans and Asians not dying en masse from HCQ incorporates those outside of vulnerable populations into your group and overlooks the possibility that those in vulnerable populations did not fare well with the drug. So another GG hoax debunked. Happy Tuesday, hoaxer. Speaking of hoaxes, Cavuto misrepresented a study of already terminally ill patients to warn people not to take a drug hundreds of millions have taken over 4 decades. Your contortions to explain it away is very telling. Bottom line, you fell for a hoax and are twisting to defend it. Please point to a study or a trial that shows people die by taking HCQ for prevention. I'll wait. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 Just now, GG said: Speaking of hoaxes, Cavuto misrepresented a study of already terminally ill patients to warn people not to take a drug hundreds of millions have taken over 4 decades. Your contortions to explain it away is very telling. Bottom line, you fell for a hoax and are twisting to defend it. Please point to a study or a trial that shows people die by taking HCQ for prevention. I'll wait. Since it's killing people and the President is taking it... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 1 minute ago, Alaska Darin said: Since it's killing people and the President is taking it... Which gets us back to the original point of the media telling us it will kill us. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 1 hour ago, whatdrought said: If trump comes out In favor of oxygen, any chance the media will boycott? That’d be great... That's bull. Trump is anti-science, anti-anything that is disagreeable to him. You guys trying to discredit the media are just making excuses for the lies your party wants people to believe. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WEATHER DOT COM Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 Just now, wAcKy ZeBrA said: I'm guessing that if he had a D attached to his political views, he'd be hailed as a brave whistleblower? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloHokie13 Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 7 minutes ago, Tiberius said: That's bull. Trump is anti-science, anti-anything that is disagreeable to him. You guys trying to discredit the media are just making excuses for the lies your party wants people to believe. You're talking about a group that is so aggressively anti-anything Trump that the man was nominated twice for the nobel peace prize fro negotiating peace deals in the middle east and their take on it was that it's time to do away with the nobel peace prize... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WEATHER DOT COM Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 2 minutes ago, GG said: I'm guessing that if he had a D attached to his political views, he'd be hailed as a brave whistleblower? I’ll assume that’s the 5G waves talking Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 2 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said: You're talking about a group that is so aggressively anti-anything Trump that the man was nominated twice for the nobel peace prize fro negotiating peace deals in the middle east and their take on it was that it's time to do away with the nobel peace prize... Any normal person would be against a lying jack ass that has no business being president on so many levels. He really is a f'n POS. Ok? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 Just now, wAcKy ZeBrA said: I’ll assume that’s the 5G waves talking I thought you left? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SectionC3 Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 15 minutes ago, GG said: Speaking of hoaxes, Cavuto misrepresented a study of already terminally ill patients to warn people not to take a drug hundreds of millions have taken over 4 decades. Your contortions to explain it away is very telling. Bottom line, you fell for a hoax and are twisting to defend it. Please point to a study or a trial that shows people die by taking HCQ for prevention. I'll wait. Rule #2 on the first paragraph, hoaxmaster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WEATHER DOT COM Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 3 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said: You're talking about a group that is so aggressively anti-anything Trump that the man was nominated twice for the nobel peace prize fro negotiating peace deals in the middle east and their take on it was that it's time to do away with the nobel peace prize... Is that their take or Graham’s? Just now, GG said: I thought you left? No, you just quoted me from a few minutes ago. 5G digs deeper than we thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unforgiven Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 3 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said: You're talking about a group that is so aggressively anti-anything Trump that the man was nominated twice for the nobel peace prize fro negotiating peace deals in the middle east and their take on it was that it's time to do away with the nobel peace prize... ...with an agenda of raising taxes, opening borders, defunding police, and a laughable 12 trillion$ new green deal.... and lets not forget a president who can barely finish a paragraph coherently let alone a sentence. yikes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SectionC3 Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 3 minutes ago, wAcKy ZeBrA said: Is that their take or Graham’s? No, you just quoted me from a few minutes ago. 5G digs deeper than we thought. Nobody digs deeper and finds less. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloHokie13 Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 2 minutes ago, wAcKy ZeBrA said: Is that their take or Graham’s? Is there an Opinion label I'm missing? Is the Atlantic a publisher or a platform? 1 minute ago, Unforgiven said: ...with an agenda of raising taxes, opening borders, defunding police, and a laughable 12 trillion$ new green deal.... and lets not forget a president who can barely finish a paragraph coherently let alone a sentence. yikes. I think you got those backwards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WEATHER DOT COM Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 1 minute ago, BuffaloHokie13 said: Is there an Opinion label I'm missing? Is the Atlantic a publisher or a platform? I don't read the Atlantic so I'm not sure how they label their editorials, but it's under the heading "IDEAS." It's also an idea I never heard about until you posted that and since I'm obviously a liberal media lemming I should have heard it before now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 10 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: Rule #2 on the first paragraph, hoaxmaster. It's self explanatory - he used a study of people who were deep into Covid to warn people from taking it for prevention. But you knew that, grave dancer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloHokie13 Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 9 minutes ago, wAcKy ZeBrA said: I don't read the Atlantic so I'm not sure how they label their editorials, but it's under the heading "IDEAS." It's also an idea I never heard about until you posted that and since I'm obviously a liberal media lemming I should have heard it before now. I clicked the ideas part to check if that was their label, it still doesn't say it's opinion. It just says it's arguments, essays, and inquiries. At the end of the day, it was posted by a recognized media outlet and quite frankly it's a disgusting reaction to our president being recognized for some good work. But they can't let him have even one good day. If it's Trump then it simply cannot be good. Ever. There were several other reactions as well that were less aggressive, but still took the time to attack the character of the people making the nominations in an effort to frame the discussion towards discredit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 37 minutes ago, GG said: I'm guessing that if he had a D attached to his political views, he'd be hailed as a brave whistleblower? Not a guess. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 32 minutes ago, GG said: I thought you left? He lied, because that's what he is. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts