Jump to content

FBI Raids Office of Trump Lawyer Michael Cohen


Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

You're shifting now... you've been saying since the beginning the collusion is real to the point of Trump being a Putin plant. 

 

After a year, you must have some evidence of this. LA Asshat already ran away from the question because he has the intellectual courage of wet paper bag... here are just a few of your posts:

 

I just told you about the evidence. You want to ignore the Trump Tower meeting? Fine. Just shows you live in a dreamland bubble. 

 

The Trump Tower meeting was collusion 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Which is a shame. A good debate is encouraged. 

 

Asshatting just to asshat gets old fast.

 

 

Only reason I stopped counting was because I realized I needed a notepad in front of me to keep track of them all.

 

Maybe later, if I'm bored and avoiding finishing my taxes, I'll lost them all.  I'd considered inventing a new fallacy, the "LA Grant Fallacy," which would basically mean "Too many fallacies to list...Jesus, you're a !@#$ing loon."

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said:



Ooooooh I get to have two identities here!? Awesome!

Note: I barely have time to be one profile here. I have quasi-enjoyed this thread though - some of it is out and out stupid, some of it is intelligent discussion,  and some is clear frustration on how little we know about the situation, and how it eventually impacts the state of our country, and our civil rights.

I did watch Alan Dershowitz say yesterday that they (Cohen and Trump) should be in front of a judge this morning asking the judge to take possession of all materials and have the judge decide what is attorney-client privileged information.  IOW have a judge be the layer, and not a (tainted) FBI.
 

Gary is accusing you of both being a female and a male so that he can justify telling you to go !@#$ yourself when he can't refute you.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

I just told you about the evidence. You want to ignore the Trump Tower meeting? Fine. Just shows you live in a dreamland bubble. 

 

The Trump Tower meeting was collusion 

 

That's not evidence of collusion no matter how many times you say it is. No congressional committee found it evidence. No FBI official found it evidence. 

 

Try again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DC Tom said:

Only reason I stopped counting was because I realized I needed a notepad in front of me to keep track of them all.

 

Maybe later, if I'm bored and avoiding finishing my taxes, I'll lost them all.  I'd considered inventing a new fallacy, the "LA Grant Fallacy," which would basically mean "Too many fallacies to list...Jesus, you're a !@#$ing loon."

 

?

Well, I know I can't wait to see it.

 

I suspect it will go down exactly as every prior conversation with you has — you, searching for ways to dismiss the points; me, attempting to get you to engage on the facts and issues at hand; you, scampering away to avoid making any statements of your own.

 

Tom may as well be the mascot for modern American conservative. His tactics are the same: Distract. Attack the messenger. Avoid the issues. Claim the other side is either lying or stupid (depending on which trait serves your argument in the moment).

 

Tom has no ideas of his own, and based on his posting history, appears to only be interested in his own vanity and power. In this case, that vanity & power are related to... a message board. In his mind, he's convinced he's making some really great points. He also thinks he's something of a humorist, or at least that's the form his smugness has taken. "Sniping retards from the balcony."

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

That's not evidence of collusion no matter how many times you say it is. No congressional committee found it evidence. No FBI official found it evidence. 

 

Try again.

 

The Committee did find evidence. Your boy Nunes chose not to pursue. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/feb/14/trump-russia-investigation-evidence-collusion-obstruction-adam-schiff

 

The Mueller investigation is ongoing. We don't know everything they know. We do know about the indictments to Manafort, Gates, etc.

 

Try again.

Edited by LA Grant
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, garybusey said:

Tom should change his tag line to "Blowing bubbles from the balcony"

 

He ought to change his avatar, too. Jim Henson's hard work doesn't deserve to be sullied by this lonely, hateful man. 

 

My favorite Tom posts are the ones where he rages against society. Like elementary school crossing guards infringing on his right to jaywalk.

 

I'm waiting for him to eventually provide a goofy rant about how someone asked him for the time, and how this is evidence that no one takes personal responsibility anymore!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Tiberius said:

Checks, that's how. It is not just the FBI but officials at the DOJ and judge that was presented facts to show it was necessary. 

 

That's how the system works. Political parties had nothing at all to do with this 

Who would ever think that the FBI, DOJ and a judge would ever collude in an illegal act? Paging a guy called Carter.

2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

English isn't a format. It's a language you continually demonstrate you struggle with comprehending. ;) 

Don't we all use the same format here?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

By continuing his pattern of lies and dishonesty.  It's the natural manure communist revolutionaries flourish in.

 

I've lost track of how many conversations Tasker has exited after being asked a direct question, or a prompt to explain himself. Same goes for Tom. 

 

Maybe I should go & bump all of those? 

 

Or maybe we should just start a thread where it's all about treating these primadonnas with the reverence they clearly desire. "THE TOM & TASKER SHOW" That way, they can finally lay out their full beliefs for us all. We'd have the opportunity to learn at the feet of the modern Socrates and Plato. Throw in Boyst, obviously this generation's Aristotle, and just imagine how much we stand to learn!

 

We can ask them why they hold so many contradictions & fallacies & wacky assumptions about society, government, and human nature. 

 

It'd be a quick thread because they won't respond after that.

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

:lol: Projection without a hint of understanding... never. gets. old. 

 

LA Asshat admits he doesn't read other posts - yet will argue positions (people never held) to shape the argument his way. That's called dishonesty. 

 

LA Asshat calls out Tasker for not answering direct questions while he spent WEEKS dodging every question thrown his way. That's called hypocrisy. 

 

LA Asshat - an intellectual GIANT I tell ya. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

Grant doesn't care to summarize your position.  Grant is a Marxist agitator and Alinskyite who refuses to engage in honest debate.  Rather than do so he makes personal attacks, and constructs strawmen to attack.  He insists others answer his questions, but refuses to respond to questions asked of him.

 

He goes so far as to attempt to associate those he disagrees with, with pedophiles in place of making an argument.  Recently he has called conservative/Republicans "abject evil".

 

He tells people that it's not important for them to understand the issues, but it is important for them to be passionate about them, and tells them to outsource their critical thinking surrounding those issues to groups he has aligned himself with.  To be more emotional, less interested in learning and understanding of the events which dictate your lives.  To trust him while he advocates policies which strip away the protections of the most basic human rights, advocating for knife control, much less gun control, limits to your speech and religious rights; all while laughing away the beginnings of a genocide happening today in a Western nation.  But you should trust him, and people like him.  Blindly.  Unthinking.  But be passionate about it.  Because the other guys are abject evil.

 

And now he's trying to tell you that the FBI, currently under investigation for wide ranging criminality rising to the level of treason, seizing all of the communications between the sitting President and his lawyer isn't problematic because his lawyer's (reported) nebulous involvement with taxi medallions somehow create a magical criminal conspiracy between Trump and Cohen, and the FBI, hostile towards the president to a criminal degree and rife with leaks, is proper in making an end run around all the protections afforded to citizens by our system of jurisprudence.

 

Again, Grant does not believe in rights or the foundational principals of our country, and he has demonstrated for us another vital tradition of our system of justice:  the right to representation in defense.  Note how he savages Alan Dershowitz for having the audacity to defend a man who, regardless of guilt or innocence, had evidence planted for use against him (a common practice with the LAPD at the time) by the police.   Think about that:  even lawyers who stand for the accused against the weight of government are bad people who should not be listened to, because they stand for the accused against the government.

 

Beliefs like this are not hallmarks of a good person.  They are representative of a would-if-only-he-could-be despot who worships at the alter of government, and wants you to be emotional and ignorant towards those ends.

 

Don't indulge him.  Become your own expert.  Make up your own mind.  Live free.

 

 

no more needs to be said! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Gary is accusing you of both being a female and a male so that he can justify telling you to go !@#$ yourself when he can't refute you.


There are some odd ducks in this thread for sure. Nevertheless, I have enjoyed the debate. I haven't enjoyed the name calling (the opposite of debate), but it is no worse than any of the political blogs I frequent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

So you are just down to throwing out insults now. It looks more like your grasp of the truth is whats in question 

If someone is a complete idiot and moron is it an insult to call him just that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

That's not evidence of collusion no matter how many times you say it is. No congressional committee found it evidence. No FBI official found it evidence. 

 

Try again.

Ya, the House committee run by Republicans found nothing and smeared the FBI. 

 

How would you know the FBI didn't see it as evidence? They are still investigating, as is the Senate, neither of which have released reports. 

 

You are so full of it. 

2 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

If someone is a complete idiot and moron is it an insult to call him just that?

I dunno, but you clowns literally just call anyone that doesn't follow the Trump line idiots. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

:lol: Projection without a hint of understanding... never. gets. old. 

 

LA Asshat admits he doesn't read other posts - yet will argue positions (people never held) to shape the argument his way. That's called dishonesty. 

 

LA Asshat calls out Tasker for not answering direct questions while he spent WEEKS dodging every question thrown his way. That's called hypocrisy. 

 

LA Asshat - an intellectual GIANT I tell ya. 

 

I've quite patiently answered virtually every question thrown my way. Even your dumb ones. Even on this page! No acknowledgment, though, of course. You also had me on ignore, I thought? You said that multiple times.

 

Honestly? Who knows what you actually do or don't believe. The only consistent thing about you is your inconsistency.

 

Real question — are you on medication, Rhino? If not, you should look into an SSRI or something because you come across as someone who is depressed & a threat to harm themselves. I have some genuine concern that you're going to really lose your marbles when Mueller's investigation is done and... you don't need to? It's not necessary.

 

Lastly. I don't want to piss in your cheerios anymore than I already have but I guess you should know that "LA Asshat" is a pretty weak slam. I thought "LA Rant" was at least a fairly clever play on words. Why not just stick with that?

 

Here are some better options, free of charge.

 

—"LA Grating" (when you want to accuse me of being long-winded)

—"LA Can't"  (when you want to accuse me of being dumb)

—"LA Groan"  (general use)

—"LA Garbage" (general use)

—"Lying Ass Grant" (when you want to accuse me of lying)

 

There. 5 freebies to help your smear campaign be at least a little more clever.

 

Don't say I never did anything for ya, buddy boy.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...