Major Mud Posted September 12, 2015 Share Posted September 12, 2015 http://yourteamcheats.com/BUF I must say the wind tunnel trick was great, and the rest were mild. And at the time how many other teams and players were doing the same things. Still not even close to #Cheatriot levels. I will look at the other teams when I have more bathroom, err reading time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Billieve Posted September 12, 2015 Share Posted September 12, 2015 This is INteresting, but I thINk I've read it before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bladiebla Posted September 12, 2015 Share Posted September 12, 2015 That website is clearly maintained by a Pats**(**) fan... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PromoTheRobot Posted September 12, 2015 Share Posted September 12, 2015 (edited) That website is clearly maintained by the Pats**Fixed. It's part of their social media propaganda campaign, which includes buying national media pundits. Control the message! Edited September 12, 2015 by PromoTheRobot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K D Posted September 12, 2015 Share Posted September 12, 2015 so the author (clearly a Pats fan) is admitting the Pats cheated? so that means Tommy lied under oath. uh ohhh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bladiebla Posted September 12, 2015 Share Posted September 12, 2015 Fixed. It's part of their social media propaganda campaign, which includes buying national media pundits. Control the message! HAH! If you're going to fix it at least leave the (**) for the two Superbowls where they didn't get caught cheating, but clearly did as history shapes the precedent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattM Posted September 12, 2015 Share Posted September 12, 2015 What a joke of a page. I love how for PEDs the Bills have 5 going back to 1979, with nearly all being from the early '90's or before, while New England has 4 since 2007 (and I think they may be missing some). I also love how they minimize all of the things the Cheats* have been caught doing (including by saying (with zero proof) that "everyone else is doing it, too.") The scope and size does suggest to me that pros (ie, the Pats* PR Dept) are behind this. Disgusting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeffismagic Posted September 12, 2015 Share Posted September 12, 2015 (edited) This website was created by a Pats fan when Deflategate broke. Everyone does it is this defense and this crappy website. We should create our own and use SEO to outrank this. Edited September 12, 2015 by jeffismagic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
todd Posted September 12, 2015 Share Posted September 12, 2015 So deflategate is ranked as a zero, and spygate was ranked as a 2 out of 5. The domain name registration is hidden. Guarantee it is a pats fan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted September 12, 2015 Share Posted September 12, 2015 So deflategate is ranked as a zero, and spygate was ranked as a 2 out of 5. The domain name registration is hidden. Guarantee it is a pats fan. Your slueth skills and reasonable deductions are impressive. Now that you mention it - an amateur site set up to show that the pats aren't the only team breaking rules in response to deflate-gate probably is designed by a pats fan, and not a chiefs fan or impartial statistician. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bladiebla Posted September 12, 2015 Share Posted September 12, 2015 Your slueth skills and reasonable deductions are impressive. Now that you mention it - an amateur site set up to show that the pats aren't the only team breaking rules in response to deflate-gate probably is designed by a pats fan, and not a chiefs fan or impartial statistician. Which is fine, except for the ranking system; singleplayers using peds are nowhere near the cheat of filming your superbowl oppenents walkthrough signals which isnt even listed in the Pats**(**) case... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts