Ozymandius Posted November 8, 2012 Share Posted November 8, 2012 The more appropriate analogy is probably Dems changing tack and nominating a centrist in Clinton after losing 3 straight elections, but go ahead, be my guest and "Stay the Course" into irrelevancy.... GOP will stay the course and triumph. As I've said before, it's about the candidate. If anyone thinks the GOP is in trouble and will soon be irrelevant or whatever, then you should be willing to bet that the Dems will win the 2016 presidency. I will take any bet from any person up to $1,000. (Obviously if you lose, you wouldn't really pay me 1K. You would just change your username. But I'm okay with that, too) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted November 8, 2012 Share Posted November 8, 2012 maybe one of you can help me understand something.... I get the limited government, lower (and maybe simplify) my taxes, stay out of my wallet, don't ram your healthcare mandate down my throat, etc. - let's call it fiscal conservatism so, if a large group of americans believe that to the core, and I think they do, then why is it ok for that same government to decide whether a woman can have an abortion, can marry someone of the same sex, or any of the other socially conservative mandates that are seemingly ok to ram down the throats of the citizens? why is it not only ok, but required that gov't stay out of those financial issues, yet they're able to decide some really personal things about others based on their own beliefs and faith? seems pretty hypocritical to me... and you just figured out the split in the republican party! add in whether you can go to other countries and tell them what to do, as well as actually staying out of the wallet and not just saying you will and i think you have the dissent covered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duck_dodgers007 Posted November 8, 2012 Share Posted November 8, 2012 Republican party, this is what you need to do: 1. Grow a collective set of nuts - Stop being the Conservative version of the John Kerry. Distinguish yourselves on the most imprtant issues and take them head on. Particularly on economic issues. Our economic model is unsustainable, impossible to defend, and easy to explain. Stop dancing around the issue and dive in and hammer it in common sense terms. Talk to people straight, and assume they're not retarded. A lot are, but you'll win more with logic than gimmicks and talking points. 4. Explain to blacks why free market principles are in their best Ok, and what economic specifics do you propose to "save" the country? What, cut taxes for everyone-- but especially for the wealthy who pay the most, and slash government services? That's it, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dayman Posted November 8, 2012 Share Posted November 8, 2012 (edited) Mitt should have played it like this: https://www.youtube....h?v=n3OBCzVTYkM Edited November 8, 2012 by TheNewBills Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted November 9, 2012 Author Share Posted November 9, 2012 ABC, NBC, CBS are now "liberal media?" It's like you got on a raft and started drifting out into the Atlantic ocean. Then you looked back and said, "hey where's North America going?" If you even deny this you either have your head in the sand, you're not watching, or you're so far left that you can't even see it. I watched ABC coverage. Every single person on their team is a hard left Democrat. And I don't think I even need to mention NBC. They let their true colors show. They were orgasmic Tuesday night and Wednesday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oxrock Posted November 9, 2012 Share Posted November 9, 2012 If you even deny this you either have your head in the sand, you're not watching, or you're so far left that you can't even see it. I watched ABC coverage. Every single person on their team is a hard left Democrat. And I don't think I even need to mention NBC. They let their true colors show. They were orgasmic Tuesday night and Wednesday. Not just the news. It's in the programming as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted November 9, 2012 Author Share Posted November 9, 2012 Not just the news. It's in the programming as well. You're not kidding. Access Hollywood was playing in the background last night and everyone acted like they'd just won the lottery. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
....lybob Posted November 9, 2012 Share Posted November 9, 2012 Elections have consequences. My personal tax rate is up 30% thismorning, so the first thing I did today was tell my housekeeper and gardener that they will either also agree to work for 30% less or they will not have jobs with me anymore. The gardener is staying on, the housekeeper argued and was dismissed from service. As to the housekeeper, the wife wasn't thrilled, because now she has to begin a fresh search for a new one. However, with the economy as it is, it will be easy to find a new one even with her reduced hiring budget. I could have afforded to retain the old help at the same rate, but why would I after my own means have been reduced? I work for me, and to expand my own finances. Not to provide bloated earnings for luxury employees. Elections have consequences. What the Republican party needs is more Ambassadors of goodwill like TakeYouToTasker to spread out and disseminate their views that will surely resonate with the common folk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RI Bills Fan Posted November 9, 2012 Share Posted November 9, 2012 (edited) Jesus, call the Wambulance! You guys get ridiculous with this nonsense. Yes there is a liberal bias in the media. It comes from the fact that most journalists are liberals. We get it! But its an unintentional bias. The MSM attempts to be neutral in their coverage of the news. They do a fair but not perfect job of it. And we are notified of every slip-up they make by you poor downtrodden conservatives crying like babies every time some big mean liberal journalist doesn't phrase something in the way you believe they should. But there is only one news organization that intentionally inserts bias into their coverage of events, FOX. Where'd that get you guys? How do those polls look now? How many of those swing states went to Romney? How much cheering were they doing and for who? Edited November 9, 2012 by RI Bills Fan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted November 9, 2012 Share Posted November 9, 2012 What the Republican party needs is more Ambassadors of goodwill like TakeYouToTasker to spread out and disseminate their views that will surely resonate with the common folk. The more of my money you decide to vote yourself, the less of it will be available for you to earn. Perhaps you'd like to pass laws guiding how much of my earnings I'm allowed to keep for myself rather than spend next, as you've already passed laws increasing my tax burden anyhow? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted November 9, 2012 Author Share Posted November 9, 2012 Jesus, call the Wambulance! You guys get ridiculous with this nonsense. Yes there is a liberal bias in the media. It comes from the fact that most journalists are liberals. We get it! But its an unintentional bias. The MSM attempts to be neutral in their coverage of the news. They do a fair but not perfect job of it. And we are notified of every slip-up they make by you poor downtrodden conservatives crying like babies every time some big mean liberal journalist doesn't phrase something in the way you believe they should. But there is only one news organization that intentionally inserts bias into their coverage of events, FOX. Where'd that get you guys? How do those polls look now? How many of those swing states went to Romney? How much cheering were they doing and for who? Sick my duck. When you libs stop soaking tampons over Fox News and talk radio, despite having the biggest microphone that speaks to the pop-culture crowd that votes but doesn't follow the issues, I might be a little more receptive to what you have to say on the issue. It's not unintentional and it's not harmless. One party's scandal is another parties "no big deal". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oxrock Posted November 9, 2012 Share Posted November 9, 2012 Jesus, call the Wambulance! You guys get ridiculous with this nonsense. Yes there is a liberal bias in the media. It comes from the fact that most journalists are liberals. We get it! But its an unintentional bias. The MSM attempts to be neutral in their coverage of the news. They do a fair but not perfect job of it. And we are notified of every slip-up they make by you poor downtrodden conservatives crying like babies every time some big mean liberal journalist doesn't phrase something in the way you believe tHshey should. But there is only one news organization that intentionally inserts bias into their coverage of events, FOX. Where'd that get you guys? How do those polls look now? How many of those swing states went to Romney? How much cheering were they doing and for who? Yes! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdog1960 Posted November 9, 2012 Share Posted November 9, 2012 yall forgot pbs. looks like big bird will continue to influence unsuspecting toddlers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RI Bills Fan Posted November 9, 2012 Share Posted November 9, 2012 Sick my duck. When you libs stop soaking tampons over Fox News and talk radio, despite having the biggest microphone that speaks to the pop-culture crowd that votes but doesn't follow the issues, I might be a little more receptive to what you have to say on the issue. It's not unintentional and it's not harmless. One party's scandal is another parties "no big deal". Lick your clit would be more accurate. You got ten pounds of sand in your vajayjay? Talk about a perpetual victim. The big mean liberals are picking on me, WAH, WAH! The MSM is Biased against us poor little Conservatives! WAH WAH! They don't slant things the way FAUX does! WAH! WAH! Man up and put a fricking sock in it. When were you promised that the rest of the world was organized to make you feel good about your opinions and biases? What makes conservatives right and everybody else wrong? Other than the FAUX News Channel trumpeting that message 24/7? Really, think about it. FOX has the largest audience of all the news channels. They control the debate in many areas. Yet, if you listen to them, and you, they're not part of the MSM. Horse-Pucky! But you still have a choice. If you don't like the way NBC or any other channel reports the news, DON'T WATCH THAT CHANNEL! Stick to FOX and their "accurate reporting" and "Fair and Balanced" coverage. Just whine a lot quieter the next time you discover they sold you a pile of manure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted November 9, 2012 Author Share Posted November 9, 2012 Lick your clit would be more accurate. You got ten pounds of sand in your vajayjay? Talk about a perpetual victim. The big mean liberals are picking on me, WAH, WAH! The MSM is Biased against us poor little Conservatives! WAH WAH! They don't slant things the way FAUX does! WAH! WAH! Man up and put a fricking sock in it. When were you promised that the rest of the world was organized to make you feel good about your opinions and biases? What makes conservatives right and everybody else wrong? Other than the FAUX News Channel trumpeting that message 24/7? Really, think about it. FOX has the largest audience of all the news channels. They control the debate in many areas. Yet, if you listen to them, and you, they're not part of the MSM. Horse-Pucky! But you still have a choice. If you don't like the way NBC or any other channel reports the news, DON'T WATCH THAT CHANNEL! Stick to FOX and their "accurate reporting" and "Fair and Balanced" coverage. Just whine a lot quieter the next time you discover they sold you a pile of manure. You really are an idiot. You don't even get the point you're arguing against. Wipe the drool from your chin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted November 9, 2012 Share Posted November 9, 2012 Can we atleast agree that if media outlets aren't doing an unbiased job both in respect to what they choose to cover, and how they perform that coverage, then they aren't "news" but rather are a poisons form of info-tainment? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattM Posted November 9, 2012 Share Posted November 9, 2012 GOP will stay the course and triumph. As I've said before, it's about the candidate. If anyone thinks the GOP is in trouble and will soon be irrelevant or whatever, then you should be willing to bet that the Dems will win the 2016 presidency. I will take any bet from any person up to $1,000. (Obviously if you lose, you wouldn't really pay me 1K. You would just change your username. But I'm okay with that, too) Whatever gets you through the night, but most of the data shows otherwise. Tough to reconcile the xenophobia of much of the Republican party with the need to be more open and inclusive, for example. Combine that with offering nothing but bootstraps platitudes (usually delivered by plutocrats such as Ryan or Romney or, at minimum, folks who grew up "comfortable" yet still look down on others less fortunate in initial circumstances) to the middle and working classes, which some folks are beginning to understand, and soon you may find yourselves circling the toilet bowl. Read Kristof's NYT op-ed from this morning--he nailed it.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted November 9, 2012 Share Posted November 9, 2012 MattM: The bootstraps rhetoric is just about the only thing I find appealing about the current GOP platform. What are your specific objections to a guiding philosophy that espouses the value of self-reliance and financial independence? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duck_dodgers007 Posted November 9, 2012 Share Posted November 9, 2012 The more of my money you decide to vote yourself, the less of it will be available for you to earn. Perhaps you'd like to pass laws guiding how much of my earnings I'm allowed to keep for myself rather than spend next, as you've already passed laws increasing my tax burden anyhow? It costs money to live in the best country in the world. That in itself is a free market fact of life. Why should you get a free ride? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RI Bills Fan Posted November 9, 2012 Share Posted November 9, 2012 You really are an idiot. You don't even get the point you're arguing against. Wipe the drool from your chin. Yeah, You've got nothing. If you get called on your crying and whining there's nothing behind it. No Backup, nothing of substance beyond, "They're Picking on ME! WAH!". Go suck your thumb and feel abused. Just do it quietly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts