Jim in Anchorage Posted November 1, 2012 Share Posted November 1, 2012 And more funny stuff from CBS News. http://www.cbsnews.c...tack/?tag=socsh [/size][/font][/color] Man, this whole thing is a yuckaminute. Good thing it never kept Obama from his Vegas trip, because that would have been the REAL disaster. absent coordination from Counterterrorism Security Group, a senior US counterterrorism official says the response to the crisis became more confused. The official says the FBI received a call during the attack representing SAecretary of State Hillary Clinton and requesting agents be deployed. But he and his colleagues agreed the agents "would not make any difference without security and other enablers to get them in the country and synch their efforts with military and diplomatic efforts to maximize their success." State called the FBI to stop a attack in Benghazi? The FBI? Literally unbelievable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted November 1, 2012 Share Posted November 1, 2012 CBS: KEY TASK FORCE NOT CONVENED DURING #BENGHAZI CONSULATE ATTACK: CBS News has learned that during the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. Mission in Benghazi, the Obama Administration did not convene its top interagency counterterrorism resource: the Counterterrorism Security Group, (CSG): “The CSG is the one group that’s supposed to know what resources every agency has. They know of multiple options and have the ability to coordinate counterterrorism assets across all the agencies,” a high-ranking government official told CBS News. “They were not allowed to do their job. They were not called upon.” “It was decided from the first moments that this wasn’t terrorism, because it would be politically harmful if it were terrorism.” . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinga Posted November 1, 2012 Share Posted November 1, 2012 funny how this story is growing legs of it's own huh??? It took way too long, but folks, to some of us anyway, there's no surprise in PBOs incompetence. What's telling however, is the continued "leaks" we get... Moral of the story??? Never, ever, throw your intelligence community under the bus. Obama supporters had actually better hope he wins re-election because then, he can only face impeachment over this. If he's out of office however, he better stay on Romney's good side and ask for a pardon because the charges could be much much worse.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted November 2, 2012 Share Posted November 2, 2012 And now here comes Jake Tapper with ABC News. Gosh darn, this joke of a story won't go away. http://abcnews.go.co...drip-drip-drip/ And the Las Vegas Review Journal, which endorsed Obama in 2008, drills into the Benghazi joke story and insists... And concluding... http://www.lvrj.com/...-176736441.html I especially like this from your ABC link: "The White House press secretary – who has not held a full-fledged briefing with the White House press corps since October 12 – said that the president “expects the investigations to be rigorous. He is extremely focused on making sure that we find exactly what happened and who was responsible, and tracking down those who were responsible and bringing them to justice.” Sure, that what his focus is on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted November 2, 2012 Share Posted November 2, 2012 Should Obama be impeached for Benghzi? It's too soon to say, but it's certainly starting to look that way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinga Posted November 2, 2012 Share Posted November 2, 2012 Should Obama be impeached for Benghzi? yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duck_dodgers007 Posted November 2, 2012 Share Posted November 2, 2012 What will the charge be? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted November 2, 2012 Share Posted November 2, 2012 yes It's impossible to say before both independent and congressional investigations take place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim in Anchorage Posted November 2, 2012 Share Posted November 2, 2012 What will the charge be? dereliction of duty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinga Posted November 2, 2012 Share Posted November 2, 2012 CBS: KEY TASK FORCE NOT CONVENED DURING #BENGHAZI CONSULATE ATTACK: CBS News has learned that during the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. Mission in Benghazi, the Obama Administration did not convene its top interagency counterterrorism resource: the Counterterrorism Security Group, (CSG): “The CSG is the one group that’s supposed to know what resources every agency has. They know of multiple options and have the ability to coordinate counterterrorism assets across all the agencies,” a high-ranking government official told CBS News. “They were not allowed to do their job. They were not called upon.” “It was decided from the first moments that this wasn’t terrorism, because it would be politically harmful if it were terrorism.” . if the alphabet news is involved now, how can even the libtards here deny it?? But they will..... What will the charge be? what else?? High crimes and misdemeanors.... I know, you wanted the treason thingy huh??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted November 2, 2012 Share Posted November 2, 2012 What will the charge be? "Misbehavior in the face of the enemy" comes quickly to mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duck_dodgers007 Posted November 2, 2012 Share Posted November 2, 2012 CBS: KEY TASK FORCE NOT CONVENED DURING #BENGHAZI CONSULATE ATTACK: CBS News has learned that its top interagency counterterrorism resource: the Counterterrorism Security Group, (CSG): “The CSG is the one group that’s supposed to know what resources every agency has. They know of multiple options and have the ability to coordinate counterterrorism assets across all the agencies,” a high-ranking government official told CBS News. “They were not allowed to do their job. They were not called upon.” “It was decided from the first moments that this wasn’t terrorism, because it would be politically harmful if it were terrorism.” That was after the attack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinga Posted November 2, 2012 Share Posted November 2, 2012 "Misbehavior Cowardice in the face of the enemy" comes quickly to mind. fixed it for you.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted November 2, 2012 Share Posted November 2, 2012 That was after the attack. Read the article you simpleton. It clearly states that it was not convened during the attack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted November 2, 2012 Share Posted November 2, 2012 DONALD RUMSFELD TALKS #BENGHAZI with Hugh Hewitt: HH: You’ve done a lot of Sunday shows in your life, and when Ambassador Rice did five Sunday shows and said the same thing five times about the video precipitating this event, had she been briefed by the White House, in your experience? Did that have to have happened? DR: Absolutely. I don’t know the woman, but I really, I almost feel sorry for her, because the way it works is that the White House communications people work with the chief of staff and the national security advisor and the President, and they decide what talk shows they want to put people on, and what the message ought to be. And she was told, without question she was told by the White House, we want you to go on these shows, and here’s what we want you to say. There can be no doubt about that. HH: Is there a cover up, in your opinion, underway, Mr. Secretary? DR: Oh, I don’t see how you could, anyone who understands the English language, could come up with any other characterization. It is, without question, a case of people being uncomfortable with the truth, grabbing arguments of convenience that seem to fit the narrative they’d like the American people to believe, and then finding that people don’t like that out there, that there’s someone in the CIA said well, wait a minute, we didn’t tell anyone to stand down. And all of a sudden, that contradicts what the White House is putting out. And then the intelligence agency looks at it and says well, no, it wasn’t spontaneous. We had warnings that al Qaeda affiliates were active in the area. And piece by piece, it comes out. You know the old story in Washington. It’s not what you do, it’s the cover up that counts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OCinBuffalo Posted November 2, 2012 Share Posted November 2, 2012 fixed it for you.... Actually? It's misbehavior now. This was done to make looting subject to the same thing as cowardice. Looting is not cowardice, so, misbehavior instead. I posted this above...http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/topic/151961-report-obama-watched-benghazi-attack-from-situation-room/page__st__20?do=findComment&comment=2615873 I almost guarantee that drone cam '= "in the presence of the enemy". However, "before the enemy" means fighting with, etc. "In the presence" is supposed to cover "in the rear with the gear" guy, who doesn't perform his duty, etc. I don't know how far back "the rear" goes. If it goes to the WH, and the UCMJ applies? Then yeah, we might just have a guilty president or certainly a guilty defense secretary, whose punishment would be literally, a firing squad. No way it ever gets there though. That would be insane, no matter how "by the book" it is. They'd resign, then Congress would give them a pass/it would just end..long before it got to that. Which is kinda BS, because if Pvt. Pissypants runs, he gets shot, and it's 50/50 on whether he gets a trial. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duck_dodgers007 Posted November 2, 2012 Share Posted November 2, 2012 Read the article you simpleton. It clearly states that it was not convened during the attack. How long did this attack last? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drinkTHEkoolaid Posted November 2, 2012 Share Posted November 2, 2012 How long did this attack last? I think 6 to 7 hours. A long time. Plenty of time to react. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted November 2, 2012 Share Posted November 2, 2012 I think 6 to 7 hours. A long time. Plenty of time to react. Yes, but what about the fog? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drinkTHEkoolaid Posted November 2, 2012 Share Posted November 2, 2012 Yes, but what about the fog? Oh you mean the live feed from the hi-res and infra red cameras from the drone/s orbiting the compound for the bulk of the assault? Or The phone calls and pleas for assistance explaining exactly what was happening on the ground? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts