bills_red Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/4248/stewart-bradley The Cardinals are interested in free agent Stewart Bradley, according to the Arizona Republic.Bradley is generating plenty of interest around the league despite losing his job to Jamar Chaney last season. That's because Bradley has starting experience and can play multiple positions. The Rams and Bills are also reportedly in the mix. http://twitter.com/#!/kentsomers/status/96628263580999680 Cardinals interested in Eagles LB Stew Bradley, a UFA. He can played inside and out. Other teams, including Buff, are interested Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 I'd rather have Burnett. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DreReed83 Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 If this guy could stay healthy, he'd be such an upgrade over Poz. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 If this guy could stay healthy, he'd be such an upgrade over Poz. Same applies to Nick Barnett. Which is why I'd rather go Kevin Burnett. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LABills08 Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 (edited) Same applies to Nick Barnett. Which is why I'd rather go Kevin Burnett. Agree with Doc. I'd take Burnett. But I'd pretty much take either of them. I'd just like to point out that the Bills have a lot of money to spend. Much of which, they HAVE to spend. Poz off the books. Stroud released. Rookie cap. Whitner gone. They have cash to spend. Edited July 28, 2011 by Union2008 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KOKBILLS Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 I'd rather have Burnett. Me 2... Really can't imagine The Bills not having a strong interest in Burnett...I think he's an upgrade to Poz and he'll come cheaper...What's not to like about that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfan89 Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 Why not go after him and Barnett or Burnett? Are we really set on Andre Davis a older player who gets hurt a lot and is average when he is in? If we get both then we would have Bradly, Davis, Barnett/Burnett, and Sheppard that's not a bad group of MLB's. If we have to start Andre Davis I think its a mistake not a tragic one but a mistake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanInUticaTampa Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 I'd rather have Burnett. I'd rather have both. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bills_red Posted July 28, 2011 Author Share Posted July 28, 2011 Why not go after him and Barnett or Burnett? Are we really set on Andre Davis a older player who gets hurt a lot and is average when he is in? If we get both then we would have Bradly, Davis, Barnett/Burnett, and Sheppard that's not a bad group of MLB's. If we have to start Andre Davis I think its a mistake not a tragic one but a mistake. I'd like that idea but we drafted Chris White in R6 to be the coverage ILB think we could keep 5 ILB? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of Rob Johnson Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 I think the plan is for Davis to be a starter with Sheppard as his backup & eventual replacement. Therefore they will need to sign a starter to replace Poz with Sheppard, Torbor & White backing up that spot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bills_red Posted July 28, 2011 Author Share Posted July 28, 2011 Forgot about Torbor, he could be upgraded not sure though if Bradly/Barnett/Burnett would want to back-up and I am sure Torbor isn't making much but Siler could be had cheap most likely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dgrid Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 (edited) I'd like that idea but we drafted Chris White in R6 to be the coverage ILB think we could keep 5 ILB? Chris White is a thumper type, not coverage Edited July 28, 2011 by dgrid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Barbarian Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 6'4" 260 sign him up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Hindsight Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 I'd like that idea but we drafted Chris White in R6 to be the coverage ILB think we could keep 5 ILB? Nothing against Chris White, but If you can a better player, you do it 6th Rounders are longshots anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shoretalk Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 If this guy could stay healthy, he'd be such an upgrade over Poz. Would rather have other options but I agree he'd be an upgrade over what we had. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bills_red Posted July 28, 2011 Author Share Posted July 28, 2011 Chris White is a thumper type, not coverage O, thought I read a scouting report that said he was more of a coverage guy. Nothing against Chris White, but If you can a better player, you do it 6th Rounders are longshots anyway Agree but you have to think about the money too. White will be cheap while if we get 2 of these 3 Bradly/Barnett/Burnett it will be like 4-6 mill per yr for each. I'd get one of those guys then Siler who we could get for IDK 2-3 mill most likely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts