buffalo_bills Posted November 8, 2010 Share Posted November 8, 2010 We're still 0-8, but probably get blown out against Baltimore, NE and this week as well. Gailey has really made an impact on this offense. The future is very bright for our offense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob in STL Posted November 8, 2010 Share Posted November 8, 2010 (edited) We're still 0-8, but probably get blown out against Baltimore, NE and this week as well. Gailey has really made an impact on this offense. The future is very bright for our offense. Really hard to say what our record would be. We would be a losing team, and we would be boring, and we would have no hope. We can safely say those things. Edited November 8, 2010 by Bob in STL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Posted November 8, 2010 Share Posted November 8, 2010 We're still 0-8, but probably get blown out against Baltimore, NE and this week as well. Gailey has really made an impact on this offense. The future is very bright for our offense. I agree. Baltimore and KC were supposed to destroy us. Both games went to OT. This one today almost did, too. Gailey is establishing an identity. Gone are those distractions of Edwards (his star faded), Lynch (might as well get something for him), Hardy (sucked from Day 1), Mitchell (anyone even remember this guy) and a whole host of Tier 2 players that never hurt us, but never helped us win either. What we have now is a solid bunch of players, who are leaving it on the field. Kyle Williams is really emerging as a stalwart. The bane of my Bills fandom- Kelsay- even showed an uncanny hustle to the ball that he has not shown in maybe his entire career. Howard is doing a solid job at RT. Bell is emerging at LT. Fitz is getting it done. Does anyone else seem to realize that we are finally converting on 3rd down AND scoring TD's (something that was always lacking under Mauron)? Not only that, but we're finally stopping opposing teams on a regular basis from converting on their 3rd and longs. Sure, we need a lot of help both in running the ball and stopping the run. We need somebody who can consistently get to the passer. Better run blockers. But this team is not lying down like I expected them to. They are fighting. And fighting well. Yes, I think the culture of losing is changing. Even though the record does not show it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sullim4 Posted November 8, 2010 Share Posted November 8, 2010 If Dickless were still coaching, Trent would still be our QB. Nuff said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kultarr Posted November 8, 2010 Share Posted November 8, 2010 I really doubt it. Jauron would've won a game or three and the defense would be playing much better. Even if he was yoyoing Trent and Fitzpatrick down by down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truth on hold Posted November 8, 2010 Share Posted November 8, 2010 2 & 6 something like that because the 4-3 Cover 2 was a better defense than what we have now. But we'd still be scoring no points and headed no where. as odd as it sounds, even though we're winless with Gailey, our prospects are better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swift Sylvan Posted November 8, 2010 Share Posted November 8, 2010 2 & 6 something like that because the 4-3 Cover 2 was a better defense than what we have now. But we'd still be scoring no points and headed no where. as odd as it sounds, even though we're winless with Gailey, our prospects are better Completely agree with this post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albany,n.y. Posted November 8, 2010 Share Posted November 8, 2010 The real question should be : What is our record if Perry Fewell was still head coach? Fewell, not Jauron, was the coach at the end of last season. When comparing coaches, it should be Fewell v Gailey, not Jauron v Gailey. My vote is Fewell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chandemonium Posted November 8, 2010 Share Posted November 8, 2010 The real question should be : What is our record if Perry Fewell was still head coach? Fewell, not Jauron, was the coach at the end of last season. When comparing coaches, it should be Fewell v Gailey, not Jauron v Gailey. My vote is Fewell. I think this team would be much better right now with either Fewell HC/Gailey OC or Gailey HC/Fewell DC. Since Fewell going back to DC after being interim HC wasn't going to happen, I agree with you but it's not because of anything Gailey has or hasn't done. I really like how he has the offense playing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gabe Northern Posted November 8, 2010 Share Posted November 8, 2010 We're still 0-8, but probably get blown out against Baltimore, NE and this week as well. Gailey has really made an impact on this offense. The future is very bright for our offense. Um, we'd have won in KC and against the Bears at least. Probably pulled out another one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted November 8, 2010 Share Posted November 8, 2010 Then we'd still be saying that he needs to be fired Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts