Jump to content

Derrick Dockery update...


SDS

Recommended Posts

FWIW, the Redskins beat reporter, in explaining that Dock will soon be replaced by a draft pick, said that last year not a SINGLE coach on the Skins' staff wanted Dockery back. It was all Vinnie Cerato reclaiming a past project.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FWIW, the Redskins beat reporter, in explaining that Dock will soon be replaced by a draft pick, said that last year not a SINGLE coach on the Skins' staff wanted Dockery back. It was all Vinnie Cerato reclaiming a past project.

 

Yet another fat guy who got his money and lost his hunger. Everyone plays hard for and wants that big pay day. The players who care, the ones who want to leave behind a legacy, continue to strive to get better..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't know whether to laugh or cry.

 

FWIW, the Redskins beat reporter, in explaining that Dock will soon be replaced by a draft pick, said that last year not a SINGLE coach on the Skins' staff wanted Dockery back. It was all Vinnie Cerato reclaiming a past project.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yet another fat guy who got his money and lost his hunger. Everyone plays hard for and wants that big pay day. The players who care, the ones who want to leave behind a legacy, continue to strive to get better..

 

If he is so fat, what makes you think that he isn't hungry? :devil:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yet another fat guy who got his money and lost his hunger. Everyone plays hard for and wants that big pay day. The players who care, the ones who want to leave behind a legacy, continue to strive to get better..

 

 

Can you imagine what this league would look like if the players' union got their way and they had gaurenteed contracts?? Bad enough that so much gets front loaded in bonuses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you imagine what this league would look like if the players' union got their way and they had gaurenteed contracts?? Bad enough that so much gets front loaded in bonuses.

 

I'd say that the logical owner response then, would be cheaper, shorter player contracts, but that doesn't seem to be the trend in the NHL, where you get teams offering bizarre, 10-12 year contracts, guarantee or no.

 

The NHL does, however, ban any renegotiations before the last 6 months of the contract, and punishes holdouts with full-year bans. So with that tradeoff, it might be worth it, since it would help Buffalo retain any players who are overperforming their contracts, and it would dull the advantage of big-market teams paying out huge bonuses, then cutting the players two years later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...