Coach Tuesday Posted April 22, 2010 Author Share Posted April 22, 2010 I'm all for taking an impact player at 9 rather than reaching to fill a need at QB, OL or DL. However, RB is the deepest position on the roster outside of DB. Not to mention, the role RBs play are becoming devalued by the hour in the modern NFL where rule changes and schemes favor passing attacks. So to waste a high pick on a RB and tie up a ton of cap space on a position where teams can, and do, find way more production for less money by picking up quality (if not stud) RBs in other ways other than the first round would be a failure of epic proportions. Even if Spiller goes on to be a pro bowl RB. It's a waste of a pick. But if you have a QB who insists on checking down, might as well give him an outlet who can take a dump off to the house... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leonidas Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 But if you have a QB who insists on checking down, might as well give him an outlet who can take a dump off to the house... Thank God you're not in any way affiliated with this - or any - front office... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozymandius Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 It would be just like us to draft a scatback at #9. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coach Tuesday Posted April 22, 2010 Author Share Posted April 22, 2010 Thank God you're not in any way affiliated with this - or any - front office... Thank God you don't have to write a term paper on the topic of "sarcasm." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damian Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 He has Clausen going at 30. If that happened we could trade up to 30 to get him on the cheap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buffaloaggie Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 There's a new sheriff in town. I think there's no way they're drafting Spiller. I'm hoping the Bills FO is posturing, so that someone else will trade up into the #9 spot to get Spiller. That's the only thing that makes sense to me with so many other holes in our team to fill. RB is not a glaring need for the Bills. OT, DT, QB are. Dan Williams should be our man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 Even if Spiller goes on to be a pro bowl RB. It's a waste of a pick. Ya, if he turned out to be nearly as good as Chris Johnson, would you still sing the same tune? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarthICE Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 I'm all for taking an impact player at 9 rather than reaching to fill a need at QB, OL or DL. However, RB is the deepest position on the roster outside of DB. Not to mention, the role RBs play are becoming devalued by the hour in the modern NFL where rule changes and schemes favor passing attacks. So to waste a high pick on a RB and tie up a ton of cap space on a position where teams can, and do, find way more production for less money by picking up quality (if not stud) RBs in other ways other than the first round would be a failure of epic proportions. Even if Spiller goes on to be a pro bowl RB. It's a waste of a pick. Not really, Gailey runs a spread offense. Think Thurman in our passing KGun offense. That is what Spiller would do for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarthICE Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 Thank God you don't have to write a term paper on the topic of "sarcasm." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJPearl2 Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 If we followed it up with Saffold in the 2nd, and then Linval Joseph in the third; then traded for Thigpen or Campbell (just by saying these two names someone will jump down my throat I'm sure), I'd be happy. We could draft a QB next year. Rumor is that Saffold won't last past Indy at 31. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1billsfan Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 I'm hoping the Bills FO is posturing, so that someone else will trade up into the #9 spot to get Spiller. That's the only thing that makes sense to me with so many other holes in our team to fill. RB is not a glaring need for the Bills. OT, DT, QB are. Dan Williams should be our man. First round DT/NTs scare the heck out of me. I remember reading an article a couple of weeks ago that showed the horrible success rates of first round DT/NTs. That there was something about these large men getting so much money that a lot of the time it saps their hunger for the game. I have a feeling that Williams could be one of those kind of guys. If they pick him at #9, I hope I'm wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bills_fan Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 Not really, Gailey runs a spread offense. Think Thurman in our passing KGun offense. That is what Spiller would do for us. If we take a RB at 9, having Freddie and Lynch still on the roster, he damn well better be the second coming of Barry Sanders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CosmicBills Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 Ya, if he turned out to be nearly as good as Chris Johnson, would you still sing the same tune? Yes. Because I would argue, and be correct, in saying you could find equal production for far less cap dollars (and lower picks) later on at RB. Plus, how many super bowls has Chris Johnson won? How many playoff games even? RBs are NOT worth first round picks in the modern NFL. Sorry. It's just how the game is. That said, if the Bills DO take Spiller, I will root like hell for him to be the man and hope to be totally wrong. But it will be the first red flag the front office has raised saying they will be no different than the last three regimes. And the Bills will be stuck at the bottom yet again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CosmicBills Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 Not really, Gailey runs a spread offense. Think Thurman in our passing KGun offense. That is what Spiller would do for us. Sure. But we already have Jackson who's capable of doing that. Not to mention we could find several other lower cost RBs to fill that role without wasting a valuable top 10 pick on a guy who's shelf life is less than 8 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
profile Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 Not really, Gailey runs a spread offense. Think Thurman in our passing KGun offense. That is what Spiller would do for us. This is exactly what I have been thinking recently. I know the team currently has Fred jackson, and with a young elite level RB on the roster who just might gain yards instead of dancing behind the line(leastmode), in my opinion, makes the #9 pick the best 1st round pick in years due to the potential of having an immediate impact. Unless there's a 1 or 2 rated pass rusher or O-linemen on the board, I think it's risky to draft one of these QBs this high. Spiller at #9 makes this pick very relevant, and incase anyone hasn't noticed, thre really hasn't been a top takent RB in Buffalo since Thurman left town. Dump Marshawn to a team with a need for a dancer who like to run into tacklers, get some picks out of the deal, and make the most of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leonidas Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 Thank God you don't have to write a term paper on the topic of "sarcasm." Yeah, because someone rooting for Spiller on this board is obvious sarcasm... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wing Man Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 Narwocki is God. It's Spiller at 9. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dgrid Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 Rumor is that Saffold won't last past Indy at 31. been hearing that too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leonidas Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 Rumor is that Saffold won't last past Indy at 31. Kiper just said he expects Saffold to be taken mid-20's. Indy might not get the chance. Both Kiper and McShay have six tackles going in the first, for what it's worth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max997 Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 He's had the Bills' number for several years in a row.... http://www.profootballweekly.com/2010/04/2...ght-first-round I would normally not like this but Spiller is the best offensive player in this draft and a playmaker the Bills havnt had in a very long time i would actually like this pick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts