Jump to content

Reasonable and Civil Discussion?


Recommended Posts

No, I don't, squid. You want to demonize a single instance of boorish behavior as though the preceding 40 years of boorish behavior that make it acceptable don't exist. You can't discuss the idiocy of the "teabaggers" outside the context of the Code Pink retards, or the cringing stupidity of the witch-hunting anti-Clinton morons, u.s.w.

 

And I'm the one with the disconnect? :D I'm not the one that wants to ignore the whole socio-political environment simply to complain about a single group of people that I just don't like.

 

Actually the idea was limit the amount of idiotic diversionary material available for use in replying to my post.

 

But I should have realized there is no way to limit your particular brand of idiocy. <_<

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 131
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Are you serious? Wow, you liberals really like to insulate yourselves from the real world, don't you...

 

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/seton-motley/...er-poster-conse

 

"For written at the poster's bottom is the web address "LaRouchePAC.com," the political action committee website for Communist and perpetual Presidential candidate Lyndon LaRouche"

 

It's not surprising since you probably get your misinformation from the MSM.

 

Okay... The poster is available on lyndonladouch's website.

 

How does that prove either of your contentions, where is the connection?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I respond to exactly what he posted and you jump in with your typical "out of right field" sound bite.

"Out of right field"? <_<

Just like your earlier non answer to the question.

The fact that you don't know history isn't my fault.

Try something new, keep quiet when you're out of your depth.

There isn't anything new when you're trying to pass off the same tired crap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Out of right field"? <_<

I've already copyrighted that...

 

The fact that you don't know history isn't my fault.

And the fact that you can't answer a simple question without resorting to useless blather and obfuscation isn't my fault.

 

There isn't anything new when you're trying to pass off the same tired crap.

The funniest part of all this; you honestly don't understand the amazing irony of you making that statement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay... The poster is available on lyndonladouch's website.

 

How does that prove either of your contentions, where is the connection?

You really are an idiot; an idiot who reads someone else's ideas and tries to pass them off as their own.

 

I've been to four rallies, and the LaRouche group is always there, always with a handful of LaRouche chuckleheads over in a corner, posing for pictures.

 

Always. Every time.

 

Get out of the basement, go to a rally, and look for yourself. Or at the very least, try not to parrot what other people feed you.

 

And by the way, STILL waiting for video of everyone yelling "&#33;@#&#036;" like HuffPo said. I posted all the video available and there's not a single reference. Oh, wait, maybe no one had the ability to record video while it was happening. <_<

 

Think for yourself, ya freaking lemming..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You really are an idiot; an idiot who reads someone else's ideas and tries to pass them off their own.

 

I've been to four rallies, and the LaRouche group is always there, always with a handful of LaRouche chuckleheads over in a corner, posing for pictures.

 

Always. Every time.

 

Get out of the basement, go to a rally, and look for yourself. Or at the very least, try not to parrot what other people feed you.

 

And by the way, STILL waiting for video of everyone yelling "&#33;@#&#036;" like HuffPo said. I posted all the video available and there's not a single reference. Oh, wait, maybe no one had the ability to record video while it was happening. <_<

 

Think for yourself, ya freaking lemming..

 

Read what 1soundbite said, and what I challenged him to prove, then pull your head out of your ass.

 

Then when you calm the fluck down, point to the line in the article I posted where it says EVERYONE was yelling N****r! Because I missed that. The article talks about 1, count it again 1 person doing that. And I never said or implied anything else.

 

There's a reason I ignore most of your posts, just like I ignore OCinhismommsbasement, WisconsinRacist, Wacka, and a few others, and posts like the one above clearly show that reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Read what 1soundbite said, and what I challenged him to prove, then pull your head out of your ass.

 

Then when you calm the fluck down, point to the line in the article I posted where it says EVERYONE was yelling N****r! Because I missed that. The article talks about 1, count it again 1 person doing that. And I never said or implied anything else.

 

There's a reason I ignore most of your posts, just like I ignore OCinhismommsbasement, WisconsinRacist, Wacka, and a few others, and posts like the one above clearly show that reason.

 

Sorry dude, you're being an idiot and I don't toss that around here a lot. Above you say "one, count it again one person" but the title of your link is:

What does this say about the Tea Pary Movement?

 

Tea party movement of one? <_<

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Read what 1soundbite said, and what I challenged him to prove, then pull your head out of your ass.

 

Then when you calm the fluck down, point to the line in the article I posted where it says EVERYONE was yelling N****r! Because I missed that. The article talks about 1, count it again 1 person doing that. And I never said or implied anything else.

 

There's a reason I ignore most of your posts, just like I ignore OCinhismommsbasement, WisconsinRacist, Wacka, and a few others, and posts like the one above clearly show that reason.

Y'see, I thought you were ignoring my posts because you were so busy getting your ass handed to you by AD and Tom all the time.

 

You started the thread linking to the HuffPo article. You haven't provided anything other than someone else's thought. That's why you're once again getting your clock cleaned by people infinitely smarter than you.

 

Think for yourself and these things wouldn't happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What does it say about the "Tea Party"? nothing other than its a reflection of what we see across the world, and that is that there are many people who are uncivil and irrational across all walks of life.

 

Ain't it the truth. Isn't complaining about racism at a Tea Party like complaining about getting sprayed with some ejaculate at an orgy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ain't it the truth. Isn't complaining about racism at a Tea Party like complaining about getting sprayed with some ejaculate at an orgy?

 

How many Tea Party rallies you been to? Yeah, probably the same and th number of orgies you've been invited to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry dude, you're being an idiot and I don't toss that around here a lot. Above you say "one, count it again one person" but the title of your link is:

It's a simple and reasonable question. The answer to which and/or the outrage expressed over the fact that someone actually dared to ask the question, says a lot about the answerer.

 

Tea party movement of one? <_<

"The only thing necessary for the victory of evil is for good men to do nothing" one of your heroes said that. Think about it.

 

Interestingly, Magox, whom I frequently ridicule, was the only person who gave what I considered a correct answer.

 

The rest of you "Lemmings" were too eager to jump on and correct the "Liberal" to look past the end of your noses.

 

Not that I expected anything else

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) was called a "faggot," as protestors shouted at him with deliberately lisp-y screams. Frank, approached in the halls after the president's speech, shrugged off the incident.

 

+1 for the fat bastard, handled well

"It was absolutely shocking to me," Clyburn said, in response to a question from the Huffington Post. "Last Monday, this past Monday, I stayed home to meet on the campus of Claflin University where fifty years ago as of last Monday... I led the first demonstrations in South Carolina, the sit ins... And quite frankly I heard some things today I have not heard since that day. I heard people saying things that I have not heard since March 15, 1960 when I was marching to try and get off the back of the bus."

 

Obviously this cat was mortally wounded by his long winded chant of historical bullshido.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Say what you want about the tea party movement, the democrats and republicans. This country has no political will and hasn't for a long time. Modern Americans wouldn't be able to end slavery or break from England like the founding fathers did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And the fact that you can't answer a simple question without resorting to useless blather and obfuscation isn't my fault.

The question isn't simple, it's stupid.

 

Your consistent use of "blather and obfuscation" is beyond the point of ridiculous. Ask one of the other dudes who dresses as a chick to get through the long cruises to teach you a new phrase. To say nothing of the fact that friggin' RKFast got my point immediately. Wickedly obfuscated, obviously. Moron.

The funniest part of all this; you honestly don't understand the amazing irony of you making that statement.

Nice grammar. I'd get the irony if it were ironic. You partisans simply can't face the fact that you've been bought and sold so you continue the retarded game. Day after day, week after week. Same crap from the same sources. But I'm glad someone gave you the answer you consider "correct". <_<

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The question isn't simple, it's stupid.

Yeah, Yeah, everything you don't understand is "Stupid." Oops there goes the recess bell, time for all you 4th graders to get back to class.

 

Your consistent use of "blather and obfuscation" is beyond the point of ridiculous. Ask one of the other dudes who dresses as a chick to get through the long cruises to teach you a new phrase. To say nothing of the fact that friggin' RKFast got my point immediately. Wickedly obfuscated, obviously. Moron.

And you and RK being on the same wavelength says less about which one of you?

 

OBTW You see the new Air Farce Uni's? Can you say Bus Drivers? Flying Bus Drivers?

 

Nice grammar. I'd get the irony if it were ironic. You partisans simply can't face the fact that you've been bought and sold so you continue the retarded game. Day after day, week after week. Same crap from the same sources. But I'm glad someone gave you the answer you consider "correct". :D

Weren't you the clown who just complained about me using the same saying over and over?

Pot, Kettle, Black? Nah, not you! It's different when you do it! :o<_<

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is the purest form of stupidity I have ever seen.

 

But, RI won't get to see this response, so...

 

 

...don't you guys love it as he tried to blow by Chef's post? With a quote we are told to think about? How does that address the point? For those of you that missed it: He agrees that only 1 person said something racist, but, starts a thread about "The Movement"?

 

Perhaps RI should follow his own advice: more thinking before more posting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a simple and reasonable question. The answer to which and/or the outrage expressed over the fact that someone actually dared to ask the question, says a lot about the answerer.

Yes, RI, you have shown us so much courage by "daring" to ask a question whose premise is either false, or near pointless(um, it was one(1) guy). Why does: "So courageous"! (South Park) come to mind, I wonder? Does RI = Mr. Hand, or, the sycophantic audience in that episode? Or, has he found a retard "middle path" that allows him to be both at the same time? <_<

 

"The only thing necessary for the victory of evil is for good men to do nothing" one of your heroes said that. Think about it.

 

Interestingly, Magox, whom I frequently ridicule, was the only person who gave what I considered a correct answer.

 

The rest of you "Lemmings" were too eager to jump on and correct the "Liberal" to look past the end of your noses.

 

Not that I expected anything else

Hmm. That makes the second time in 7 days we have been "tested" by f'ing retards. First wawrow and now this tool. It's hysterical that in both cases, their attempt at positing themselves as "judges of intelligence" only served to expose their intellectual weakness.

 

If only we can get Bad Lieutenant, conner, etc. to try and do some "testing" on us...why not? Make it a retard parade!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ain't it the truth. Isn't complaining about racism at a Tea Party like complaining about getting sprayed with some ejaculate at an orgy?

Oops, look who showed up!..asking us another retarded question.

 

Yes, fine analogy there. Too bad it's not even close. The last Tea Party people I actually paid attention to were black....but they must be Uncle Toms right tool? Yes, they are racists, and therefore hate themselves. <_<

 

Nah, they can't have rational concerns about serious economic/foreign policy mistakes by Obama....because...they're black, and black people don't have their own thoughts, their thoughts are dictated by Bad Lieutenant. This is because, as we all know:

1. black people can't think for themselves, therefore

2. they need white liberals to do it for them, since

3. white liberals aren't: racist

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...