Cotton Fitzsimmons Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Marcellus "Dat Dude" Wiley was on Mike and Mike this morning weighing in on the Ray Edwards comments about Roger Gooddell. Wiley's response essentially was Gooddell is paid a fair amount, Edwards is picking a fight with the wrong guy, etc. But he went on to add that you don't always get paid according to ability citing that when he was here in Buffalo he played with Hall of Famer/greatest sack master in league history: Bruce Smith. He went on to say... "Then we brought in Rob Johnson and all that dude did was take sacks for us, I mean lets be honest here... and he was making more money than a hall of famer in Bruce Smith?!" Not to stir up a hornets nest a decade later... I just got a chuckle out of it, and wondered if anyone else heard this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bring Back Kelly Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Marcellus "Dat Dude" Wiley was on Mike and Mike this morning weighing in on the Ray Edwards comments about Roger Gooddell. Wiley's response essentially was Gooddell is paid a fair amount, Edwards is picking a fight with the wrong guy, etc. But he went on to add that you don't always get paid according to ability citing that when he was here in Buffalo he played with Hall of Famer/greatest sack master in league history: Bruce Smith. He went on to say... "Then we brought in Rob Johnson and all that dude did was take sacks for us, I mean lets be honest here... and he was making more money than a hall of famer in Bruce Smith?!" Not to stir up a hornets nest a decade later... I just got a chuckle out of it, and wondered if anyone else heard this. The Marcellus Wiley interview was directed at Sabastian Janikowski's new contract. Not Gooddell's. but It is all relative anyways. It essentially means the same thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cotton Fitzsimmons Posted February 17, 2010 Author Share Posted February 17, 2010 The Marcellus Wiley interview was directed at Sabastian Janikowski's new contract. Not Gooddell's. but It is all relative anyways. It essentially means the same thing. Incorrect my fowl friend. The Janikowski/Lechler conversation was 20 minutes after Wiley's spot. That being said... our common ground here wayward friend is quite simply the ROJO comment. It was as though he couldn't resist a little venting over it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Anyone who supported Johnson over Flutie should punch themselves in the face. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
first_and_ten Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Marcellus "Dat Dude" Wiley was on Mike and Mike this morning weighing in on the Ray Edwards comments about Roger Gooddell. Wiley's response essentially was Gooddell is paid a fair amount, Edwards is picking a fight with the wrong guy, etc. But he went on to add that you don't always get paid according to ability citing that when he was here in Buffalo he played with Hall of Famer/greatest sack master in league history: Bruce Smith. He went on to say... "Then we brought in Rob Johnson and all that dude did was take sacks for us, I mean lets be honest here... and he was making more money than a hall of famer in Bruce Smith?!" Not to stir up a hornets nest a decade later... I just got a chuckle out of it, and wondered if anyone else heard this. That was one John Butler missed on big time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cotton Fitzsimmons Posted February 17, 2010 Author Share Posted February 17, 2010 Anyone who supported Johnson over Flutie should punch themselves in the face. FLUTIE! FLUTIE! FLUTIE! WE WANT ROB! WE WANT ROB! Lets start it up again... shall we? For posterity sake, of course! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cotton Fitzsimmons Posted February 17, 2010 Author Share Posted February 17, 2010 That was one John Butler missed on big time Offsides and holding... ohhhhhh they gonna have penalize Rob! Touchdowns and field goals... ohhhhhh they must have inserted Doug! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 FLUTIE! FLUTIE! FLUTIE! WE WANT ROB! WE WANT ROB! Lets start it up again... shall we? For posterity sake, of course! "I'd rather have a little Flutie than a big Johnson" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WannabeGM Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Anyone who supported Johnson over Flutie should punch themselves in the face. Ouch... Bloody nose Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nico Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Marcellus Wiley said on nfl live that byrd is gonna be a bust....wtf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cotton Fitzsimmons Posted February 17, 2010 Author Share Posted February 17, 2010 "I'd rather have a little Flutie than a big Johnson" ROJO's got MOJO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Ouch... Bloody nose Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cotton Fitzsimmons Posted February 17, 2010 Author Share Posted February 17, 2010 Marcellus Wiley said on nfl live that byrd is gonna be a bust....wtf Ain't you heard man? This is a Flutie/Johnson debate... we're gettin the band back together! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ganesh Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Anyone who supported Johnson over Flutie should punch themselves in the face. I don't see Ralph Wilson doing any such thing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rstencel Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Anyone who supported Johnson over Flutie should punch themselves in the face. I was thinking more in line of anyone supporting either should. A awesome practice QB who was lost during actual games or great pretender who never met a mirror he didnt like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bring Back Kelly Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 "I'd rather have a little Flutie than a big Johnson" I remember that one. Great marketing tag. LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuntheDamnBall Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 I was thinking more in line of anyone supporting either should. A awesome practice QB who was lost during actual games or great pretender who never met a mirror he didnt like. THIS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 I was thinking more in line of anyone supporting either should. A awesome practice QB who was lost during actual games or great pretender who never met a mirror he didnt like. I like QBs that take us twice to the playoffs in 2 years but that's just me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobChalmers Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 I like QBs that take us twice to the playoffs in 2 years but that's just me. Mind you, that was with the #1 (and/or close to it) defense in the NFL. Of course, the all-important QB position is measured in wins/losses, right, so if the defense carries some stiff to the playoffs, he's actually not a stiff, but a "winning QB". Never mind that RoJo lost almost as many yards as he gained taking stupid sacks, and Flutie's limited arm clearly started to fail him over the course of a season, as anyone could see him using more and more body twist to make basic throws in December (and losing accuracy in the process). But you can call that "taking us to the playoffs" if you'd like. Let's pick up Trent Dilfer while we're at it - he "took" the Ravens to a Super Bowl win, after all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Mind you, that was with the #1 (and/or close to it) defense in the NFL. Of course, the all-important QB position is measured in wins/losses, right, so if the defense carries some stiff to the playoffs, he's actually not a stiff, but a "winning QB". Never mind that RoJo lost almost as many yards as he gained taking stupid sacks, and Flutie's limited arm clearly started to fail him over the course of a season, as anyone could see him using more and more body twist to make basic throws in December (and losing accuracy in the process). But you can call that "taking us to the playoffs" if you'd like. Let's pick up Trent Dilfer while we're at it - he "took" the Ravens to a Super Bowl win, after all. Yeah. Screw that he also made a pro bowl and won NFL comeback player of the year. Screw that Moulds had teh best season of his career with Flutie. Screw that he helped save teh franchise. Screw that he led an offense that finished 6th and 11th in points. http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/buf/ Flutie was an ego maniac who was jsut along for the ride. And our franchise has been so much better since we benched him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts