Search the Community

There are more black supremacists in the state of Michigan than there are white supremacists in the entire country. And that's even allowing for the very loose ADL (founded by proponents of a certain ethnostate as a response to the just trial and execution of a pedophile) definition of the term "white supremacist."

It's about Trump's trial so there's a decent amount of sarcasm thrown in there, but still contains a completely unexamined (and untrue) prior that helps undergird a couple of those "movements" you just mentioned. Does that mean you're a full-throated supporter? No, not necessarily. You're a stranger on the internet and we all know very little about each other in real life. But uncritically swallowing the idea that blacks were wrongfully convicted by "kkk DAs" en masse demonstrates at least some ignorance-bred sympathy for their positions.

Lol Over 30% of officers killed on duty are killed by a black. Every “criminal justice reform” supporter can say nothing about this topic.

For my fellow emo kids: MCR is doing a short tour called Long Live The Black Parade (follow up to their festival headline this year I assume, where they played The Black Parade in its entirety) in a few stadiums https://www.mychemicalromance.com/longlive

White leftists almost invariably have the same view on the blacks as scumbags have on their pit bulls: beloved pets who never do anything wrong unless provoked by a “systemic” narrative that cuts against them. White “conservatives” have a similar view but just express it in different ways, like the constant demonization of “white women” as the reason why Biden was elected. It is demonstrably false but it’s the only regime-approved way to attack the left’s rainbow coalition.

Someone recently responded to a reply I posted in the thread about Murderin' Marcellus, expressing disbelief and consternation at the notion that the concept of "anti-racism" is essentially a set of lies. While I am unsurprised that this particular board member embraces the aforementioned concept, I thought it would be useful for those who might find themselves aligned with conservative values of various stripes to understand what is actually meant by the term, and why opposing it is good and right. Whenever we critically approach what leftists claim is obvious or reasonable (when in fact it is neither), it is important to understand how the term was generated (that is, its genealogy, so to speak) and how it has been framed. Conservatives are generally bad at recognizing leftist framing and have readily adopted quite a bit of leftist language into their talking points, which concedes at least some portion of the leftist worldview. For a primer on framing, you can go here, but the tl;dr is that certain concepts or words have been designed through their construction and/or through priming to elicit an emotional response. In this case, you have been primed to believe that "racism" is wrong and evil (in fact, you may have heard that it's America's first and greatest sin). Therefore, you have been primed to believe that anything that is against racism must be right and good. The naming of the leftist concepts discussed below as "anti-racism" (aka "against racism") is thus a frame job designed to elicit positive emotions before you even know what the term actually means. To demolish the leftist frame and address the ideas hiding underneath them, you must trace the idea back to its source, consider the source, and consider whether adopting the idea has resulted in our country, or your life, being better or worse as a result. "Anti-" is just a prefix, so we first should examine the genealogy of the term "racism" and how it entered western consciousness, then focus on how once the people were thoroughly primed to recoil at even the mention of "racism," "anti-racist" was adopted by leftist agitators as a frame for their ideas that you would unwittingly accept simply because it's anti- that emotion you felt at the mention of "racism." The term "racism" is much younger than you probably think. First instance of the term in English is from the early 20th century, but both the common usage and modern understanding of racism began in the 1930s with the translation from German of Magnus Hirschfeld's book titled Racism. First, considering the source: Magnus Hirschfeld was a 19th/20th century jewish "sexologist" who (in)famously founded the "Institute of Sexual Research" in Weimar-era Berlin. This so-called institute facilitated the first "sex change" surgeries in Europe and helped drive the depravity of Weimar Berlin. For those not in the know Luigi Barzini describes that time like this: In short, like every other "pioneer" of modern gender or sexual theory, Hirschfeld is tied through his own words and works to some combination of genital mutilation and/or pedophilia. How many ideas of his should we really be adopting? It is worth noting further that though Hirschfeld's work was essentially the genesis of the modern understanding of the term "racism," its usage is fairly small until, big surprise here, the mid-1960s, when known communist agitators who worked tirelessly to begin the transformation of the United States from a proper nation to a failed state experienced their highest concentration of major successes (you can see the ngram here). Then came the add-ons: now there's structural racism, institutional racism, internalized racism, etc. all of which consist almost entirely (at first in academic circles, now in the mainstream) of circularly reasoned blood libel against Whites. In fact, research shows that Whites in America have the lowest in-group preference of any racial group. White animus toward a racial group simply as a result of their race as a problem, if it ever actually was a problem, fizzled out long ago. Black animus towards Whites, on the other hand, is quite a different story, as the interracial murder stats tell us year after year. Which brings us back to "anti-racism." Wikipedia will attempt to tell you that the roots of it go back to the 17th Century, though that is impossible given that words have meanings and the term "racism" hadn't even been invented yet. Mainstream sources will also gloss over the direct statements of those who actually theorize around anti-racism, instead priming you to believe that it simply is the reasonable response to the made-up sins of the various racisms. The term anti-racist was actually coined by the Black Panther Party (Leninist by admission) during the aforementioned 1960s, whose stated demands included that zero black people should ever be held responsible for crimes they may commit. Anti-racism for Whites includes the idea that Whites "must acknowledge and understand their privilege" (blood libel) and recognize that our entire society is, in fact, "White supremacist." It also includes the idea that any system, test, or other objective measure that has unequal racial outcomes (that is, that blacks do poorly in) is by definition racist (evil!!!). Therefore anytime Whites do well, it's due to racism, it's Whitey's fault, etc. meanwhile black underperformance can never be the fault of blacks (remember, crime stats are racist, IQ tests are racist, the SATs are racist, etc.). The system that "anti-racists" wish to design is one in which Whites have no authority, but all of the responsibility. Which is a succinct definition of slavery. Is this what we should want for our children? In other words, stop calling leftists "the real racists." Instead you should reject, categorically, terms imported by communists that your ancestors did just fine without. And laugh at them when they call you names invented their intellectual heroes (sodomites who liked to chop off genitals and ***** little boys).

Oklahoma parole board members include: Mental health counselor Episcopal (that is, apostate from Christianity) "Bishop" Criminal defense attorney Social worker lol, lmao The lefty worship of black murderers would be funny if it wasn't civilizational suicide.

Heritage black Americans should receive the same treatment and benefits as heritage whites under the law. That figure includes zero Haitians.

I can’t really speak to Trump’s genealogy, but ethnic Germans can be seen as cousins of sorts to the ethnic Americans in general. They assimilate just fine and have intermarried quite a lot with the old American stock. Again, ignorance of the history of the early laws of this country with respect to immigration especially is no friend. I’ve spoken to the heritage black Americans already in this very thread. If you can’t be bothered to read just say so and have done with it.

I'm just giving you the data. In London in particular, despite making up only 13% of London’s total population, blacks account for 61% of knife murder perpetrators and 53% of knife crime perpetrators. Speaking of Jamaica, black Caribbeans have a higher crime rate than black Africans. But black Africans still are at a higher rate than the national average. Why is it racist to suggest a racial basis for an attack committed on whites by blacks, but it's your sworn civic duty to suggest a racial basis (hate crime!) when a white attacks a black (rare indeed relatively speaking)?

And yet the “chavs” rank well behind blacks in knife crime per capita. Curious.

I don’t mind black people. I think they have a right to their ancestral home. Which is more than you can say for whites.

Meanwhile there are multi million dollar nonprofits set up just to get blacks off of death row on technicalities. They know they're guilty but they do it anyway. This guy was stopped by highwaymen and exercised his self-defense rights long held to be unassailable by every common law nation on the planet.

Blacks don’t have a right or claim on those folks’ resources. There is no “right” to share a city with Whites. The first quarter of this year Baton Rouge tracked a homicide rate of 68 per 100,000 adjusted for a full year. Much higher than most banana republics and third world nations run by street gangs. Would you want the children of these maniacs in the same halls and classrooms as your kids?

Just like leftists (black and tranny worship), “conservatives” have their own purity test in the US.

Would now be the time to make the requisite joke of you becoming acquainted with said criminals during your law school classes? The largest, and most visible, Asian street gangs are Chinese and typically operate with the blessing, if not as a direct extension of, the ChiCom government. Though ABZ, which is mixed SEAsians, has been pushing into more northeast territory. From what I understand there are some small Korean and Hmong gangs on the west coast. The statistics on this are pretty stark and tend to surprise people because interracial violence, in general, tends to be hidden from view (except in the case where a black guy is killed by or near a white police officer). But yes, pointing out the disparities there, I've been told, is racist. Subtle woke more correct moment, I suppose.

See this thread is hilarious because billstime itself would be clutching its pearls if any of these "people" (especially the blacks that conveniently have no photos in the posts) were publicly hanged for their crimes, meanwhile every single opponent of immigration I personally know would be glad to tie the noose.

It’s not bothersome so much as it is just stupid. Gays, blacks, jews, etc. vote largely as a bloc. Silly for any republican to attempt to court any of them. Another example why Dems win and republicans lose.

Nobody's hiding anything. Except you, hiding behind "statistics are racist." Your position is that saying anything that isn't absolute praise about blacks is racist. Ok then. We all have prejudices, billsy. It's time we be honest about it. You are prejudiced against Whites, Christians, and pretty much anyone who is normal and would be recognized as normal during the majority of American history. But this is ok, because the religion of the regime, gay race communism, says it's ok. But those of us who actually employ pattern recognition understand that Whites, Christians, and anyone who is normal and would be recognized as normal during the majority of American history are not the ones causing the problems here. Except for this (woke more correct than the mainstream moment): that "whiteness" is a problem that must be corrected.

Bodied by community notes lmao Weirdness of the statement aside, it's stupid for Republicans to go after black voters. Blacks vote as a bloc more than any other group in this country. Ignore them, reward your friends instead.

Blacks shoot more, kill more, kill police more, get killed by police more. Simple as.

Yeah, don’t do anything, except for the vast patronage network resulting in trillions in gibs to blacks over the last sixty years all at the expense of the net taxpayer (who statistically is White or Asian). And the constant crying about the blacks’ relative share of police and CJ attention, resulting in more gibs and kid glove treatment by prosecutors and the media.

Ah, but see Clay is a useful idiot for exactly this kind of tweet. He’ll point out that the kids are black, and he’ll even recommend charging them in a similar way a White would be charged. But he’ll never actually say the obvious: that gun crime is generally perpetuated by blacks, at a rate higher than that of the average coin flip landing on heads, and that the existing gun laws aren’t enforced to the letter exactly because of that.

They also tend to be more violent towards other races than other groups. 17% of homicides of white victims were committed by blacks in 2019. Meanwhile only 8% of homicides of black victims were committed by whites in the same year.

Why won’t it? For the same reasons it doesn’t switch any black votes when they yell “Dems are the real racists!” And yes among other things. The last time a republican presidential candidate got more than 30% of the Jewish vote was HW.