nick in* england

Yes it is. See.

This is just sad. You try not to get sacked when you count one thousand one, one thousand SACK. Any coincidence that the OL has been flat out horriblee the past three years? I think not.

Everett got stiffed on both penalties... The kicking penalty was worth a five not a fifteen, and the flase start didn't look like he even moved. This on a day when no flag was thrown for the tackle moving his feet because he was adjusting... No penalty says the ref! someone please explain that one to me. Also - what's the deal with the false start calls recently on Schneck? I don't buy it...

Screen pass? Nahh - we don't run that here son. Wash your mouth out. As to JP's mobility, it's hard to be mobile when you are flat on your back... I actually thought the OL did a good job in the running game on Sunday, but the pressure JP saw on limited passing downs wasn't clever. Pennington has a long way to go to be a proper starting RT. Got beat way too easily for the sack on Sunday - forgot to use his big long arms and looked like his feet were glued to the carpet much of the time in pass pro. Villarial is a liability. RG remains a position to upgrade this offseason. Actually, the best description of CV is a JAG - just a guy. OK run blocker, terrible pass pro, reaching the end of his career. Fowler is not impressive. But he doesn't do a lot to frustrate you either. Gandy is better at guard than LT. Peters is staying at LT for many years to come. Superb. On the whole our starting OL does a reasonable job in the run, a horrible job in pass, and suffers from not being able to pick up the blitz, stunts and other OL fundamentals. Mouse McNally starts to be culpable, but at least Jason Peters in in al LT now, and we can build an OL from him. Absolute musts this year are a good OC - a Nick Mangrove type - and a RG.

My line up: 6pm - Bills @ Colts - whatever US channel it is on 6pm - Chargers @ Bengals - Sky Sports Xtra 9pm - Planet Earth - BBC1 10pm - the remainder of Saints @ Steelers - Sky Sports 1 10pm - Cowboys @ Cardinals - whatver US channel it is on 1.15am - Bears @ Giants - Channel five

I actually worked with this bloke. Total freak. and a massive self publicist... Fair to say that he is NOT an MoD Chief, he is a more junior grade than me!!

I LOVE THAT ARTICLE. It's funny, entertaining and then boom! it goes and says we clobbered Green Bay. That tell you all you need to know about the journalist... He picked up his pen (laptop) and rattled off a homer piece about the Colts. It's great stuff, he did no research on the Bills, beyond maybe what he saw Monday on ESPN.com. Seriously - that piece broke me into bits.

<STEVE FAIRCHILD> SCREENS? SCREENS? SCREEEEEENS??????? What is a screen? </STEVE FAIRCHILD>

Just one? Left or right? (I agree tho)

sigh.

Here's the script Run Left Run Left Pass left incomplete to Lee Evans Punt Run Left Run Left Sack Punt Run Left Sack Pass Left incomplete to Evans Punt Sack Coverage Sack Run Left Punt Fumble Run Left Run Right (loss of 3 yards) Pass complete to Roscoe Parrish for 1 yard. Punt

People we should have kept and allowed to retire a Buffalo Bill: Ted Washington Ruben Brown Pat Williams Bruce Smith Aint it funny that they all play on the OL/DL....

I don't agree about the unis... but the red endzones are a must to bring back.... Those babies MADE RWS what it is... Maybe they don't make astroplay in large quantities of red?

I thought as much... Anyway, aesthetically the 150 is the cooler looking truck IMO.

in the 150 or the 350?

Nahh - you can pimp out those F150s real nice... The F350 Superduty 4x4 is a fine truck though - no argument there.

Oh yeah Belinda is definately hot.....

It would be funner to see R.Rich jump up and down on his ribs repeatedly than hit him with a bat.

Hey no way am I backing you up there... Brit cars are very solid automobiles. But I would never go for a Land/Range Rover over a US truck... My dream car would be the Escalade, but I'll never afford it. The F150 is reasonable.....

ok coker = croker...

A quick Pivot Table reveals these results: 16-25 For 16 (89%) Against 2 (11%) Unsure 0 26-35 For 12 (57%) Against 6 (28%) Unsure 3 (15%) 36-45 For 12 (92%) Against 1 (8%) Unsure 0 46-55 For 9 (82%) Against 2 (18%) Unsure 0 56-65 For 2 (100%) Against 0 Unsure 0 66-75 For 1 (100%) Against 0 Unsure 0 Total For 52 (78%) Against 11 (16%) Unsure 3 (4%) Support for JP is most shaky in the 26-35 bracket, with all other brackets being decisively JP supportive. Shame I can't do a gender split, but not enough of the sample is female.

Ah but he looks cool sat there trying to get it started

possibly the dumbest post ever. feel free to evaporate now.