Again, to me, it was obviously not a catch. You have to possess the ball for a certain amount of time in my opinion, which is part of completing the process of the catch. He had the ball for a split second. How is that a catch? Seriously? It's ludicrous that people think that was a catch. The Evans play was a bit more arguable, because Lee possessed the ball a fraction longer. But again, he didn't complete the process of the catch.
If it keeps going like this, people are going to declare it a catch as soon as the ball touches a receiver's hands. WTF. You have to hold on to the ball and the DB should have more than a fraction of a second to make a play on it once the WR gets his hands on it.
I just watched it several more times. What are people thinking here? I don't even think it's arguable that that was a touchdown catch by Beckham. He hadn't even secured it before it was knocked out.