Jump to content

DC Tom

Community Member
  • Posts

    71,393
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by DC Tom

  1. I think if you read that sentence in the context of the full post, it reads as though you're drawing a generic principle from specific examples. If you think otherwise, you should try posting in whatever your native language is.
  2. Why do I even put up with these arguments? "I didn't say that, you just misunderstood what I said." "No, you're misunderstanding what you said, which speaks volumes for the point you're failing to make. Pardon me for reading the words you actually typed, and not exercising my considerable mind-reading abilities against the coloring book that is your brain. I guess I gave you too much credit for rational thought."
  3. That was, all-around, the single dumbest play I've seen since the Sammy Morris fake end-around halfback option play.
  4. You made a general, not specific statement. "These two quarterbacks" is specific. Is not specific. I didn't misunderstand. You just have the English skills of a woodchuck. Say what you mean, don't blame others when you're unclear.
  5. It would be the Billsiest thing in Billsdom to lose to a winless Fitz-led Miami team that couldn't score in a Thai whorehouse.
  6. It took me three minutes to get you to go back on "the quarterback makes the receivers."
  7. There's an ivory-billed woodpecker hiding in there somewhere.
  8. You didn't see Golden Tate the other night, did you? Or Zay Jones...ever.
  9. Okay, just to humor you, I'll pretend you didn't just make the "Von Miller won in 2005 so we should trade for him because he's not Shaq Lawson" argument, and indulge this idiocy seriously. Explain to me, using X's and O's to describe how he fits into the Bills' defensive scheme, how that scheme has to be modified, and how he works with the players around him, how Von Miller improves the Bills defense from #3 to #1 in both points allowed and yards per game.
  10. More like a T-100. An early version, where calling people idiots was my only skill. Broken spirit.
  11. Both. He sucks so bad it hurts.
  12. That's good to hear, because he's probably better than you.
  13. On the one hand, I really hate Miami and don't want them to win. On the other hand, it would be absolutely spectacular to go in to the office tomorrow having had the Redskins blow this lead.
  14. He wasn't issuing a challenge to you, you know.
  15. She's not a failed soccer player, is she?
  16. And you're the only one making that argument.
  17. Because they're failed soccer players.
  18. I wonder how Jay Gruden feels right now. Probably relief at being away from this ***** franchise combined with a good amount of bitterness that even a chimpanzee like him could have won this game.
  19. Then why isn't he censored already?
  20. And how is everyone hearing about it? By Georgia screaming about how no one's hearing about it. And Twitter is allowing his screaming about him being silenced. Worst. Censorship. Ever. Georgia's not being censored, he's claiming he's being censored to build up some victim cred.
  21. I can walk 200 yards underwater faster than that.
  22. And why'd you cherry-pick 2015? Because that was the last time a #1 defense won. And they had Von Miller. Is that really your argument for trading for Von Miller? Cherry-picking the only Superbowl he was in, with a #1 defense, and ignoring the other #1 defenses that didn't make it to Superbowl, and all the other defenses without Von Miller that did win Superbowls? Is this the best argument you can make for trading for Von Miller? Please tell me it is your best argument. Because this bull#### is hilarious.
  23. God, I hope so. This game has literally no redeeming qualities. Even the damned announcers are a crime against football. I actually have to defend the officials suckitude this game, because they're trained to officiate football, and they're probably as confused by this "vaguely football-like activity" as Josh Rosen is.
  24. It's a top-3 defense that is winning games. It held the Patriots to 10 points. And you think the defensive roster needs to be tweaked? Von Miller would be expensive acquisition for what can only be a marginal improvement. The only way to appreciably improve this defense is for the offense to score more than 18 ppg. Trading for Von Miller is one of the dumbest ideas I've ever heard on this board, and that includes the Sumerian history of the sexy peach emoji.
  25. Anyone else found the Uranium One connection yet?
×
×
  • Create New...