apuszczalowski

I will let it slide, any team that can make the pats look like a joke and ruin their "perfect season" by beating them in the only game that really mattered is no enemy of mine anymore

Remember the good old days when your car was used as a way to get from Point A to Point B? Now we need to have Wifi, DVD players. touch screens, etc?

A problem with a Mac? I thought they were perfect and never had problems because they were so much better to use?

all better now

I heard Darrien Lake did away with allowing Blankets too, depending on the size of the crowd, any show over 10 or 15,000 and its no blankets

I was told no when I asked the girlfriend if I could have a lego room in the house, she said I could have legos if I want, but not a room, apparently garage and a small corner in the basement are all the rooms I get in my own house, lol

Whats the waiter going to do unless he is really good friends with the cook or doesn't like my out of work actor comments directed towards them? As a kid I was a fan of any toy that I got to build stuff out of. Lego's, Erector Sets (up here they called them Mechanos) Constructs, In fact, I think I still have most of them in my moms basement

Isn't the kitchen the womans place? LOL

I'd say the defence rests on how the ankle works out The season rides on alot more then that, and I would say a vastly improved offence will be more of a factor, like one that can score more then FG's in a game. Last year, had the offence been able to score one TD more a game, the win/loss column would have looked much better and they would have been building off of a playoff season. The defence wasn't great last year (statistics make it look much worse) but it was good enough not to cost them many games, if any. In fact, there were some games that the defence was the only reason they were still in the game til the end (Denver, Dallas....)

Well, Thats going to hurt

I disagree with that point. I think that that is just something society is now using as a way of excusing the players bad behaviours. What you are basically saying is that as long as they do the job they are payed to do, nothing else they do should matter. The thing is, rightfully so, or not, they are in a position where young children will look up to them and idolize them because they are living out a dream that most young kids have. If this is the case, who should people/children look up to? Why should people care that Clinton had sex with an intern if he was doing his job as president? Should kids not look up to the president as a role model? When you are a public figure, like an athlete, actor, politician, etc. People (especially children) will look up to you and idolize you, looking up to you as a role model/hero, it comes with the job and that great pay.

They probably went back to deliberate on weither they should get a dinner sent to them first, or if they would rather just go back home instead

I hope after they were done beating up the poparazzi they then beat up McConnaughey just for fun

especially one who's death is a result of something you did

I hope its Grape Kool-Aid, I love that stuff

I was thinking the same thing, Do people really believe they will be able to survive the apocalypse? Or that anything man made will be able to protect them from impending devistation of the world? Also, why would you want to continue living after the world is destroyed, only to end up going insane or end up dying a slow death after all the food is wiped out, and the world is destroyed?

How are we supposed to agree with your belief and view on Schobel as a player when you didn't even have him playing against the right position infront of him? No wonder he disapears in your view, your looking on the wrong side of the field As for age, isn't Taylor older then Schobel? For those complaining about Schobel being on the wrong side of 30, what about Taylor?

To blame DJ for a couple of those losses is just making excuses for other things. First off, that Broncos game was close, and at the time they were playing a team most thought was a playoff team. They held a lead alomst all game and lost it on a lucky break by the broncos at the end after the Bills team had become devestated after watching one of their close friend leave the field paralized. The inept offence and a catastrophic injury are more to blame the DJ for 1-2 plays at the end of a game. As for the Cleveland game, I think the weather played a much bigger factor in that game then anything either coach could do. Both teams played bad and it was due to the fact that it was a blizzard and severly limited the already limited Bills offence. I don't understand why people get so distraught over the Dallas game and how it was all DJ's fault. I think it would have been much better to have the bills get blown out like they were supposed to and it would be one of those forgotten games like the first NE and Pittsburgh game. Buffalo had no reason to be in that game like they were and if yet again it wasn't for a completly inept offence that couldn't capitalise and score more then FG's all game after being handed it by their defence and Tony Romo, they never would have been in that game. DJ does have the ability to "rally his troops" and get them to follow him and play hard for him, believing in him, just listen to ex-players who say they would love to play for him again. Will that be enough though for the Bills to win it all? who knows, but what he has done with the payers he ahs had shouldn't be looked down on. Not many people outside of Buffalo would say the Bills have had the talent to be a good team right now for DJ's tenure, yet both years his teams have over achieved and been in the playoff hunt late in the season. Lets see what he can do with some more talent that he has now. If there is one thing he can be faulted for, its not canning Fairchild sooner and recognising that his offence was too predictable and costing them games. Also, being a coach who can motivate and prepare teams is a good thing. It might not sound right cause you would figure that these players shouldn't need motivation, but alot of them do. There are alot of players who get their paychecks and play when they feel like it.

I disagree, in todays NFL, I don't want guys who are going to be in situations that can give the league reason to suspend them. They don't have to be choir boys donating all their spare time to feeding the homeless and saving puppies, just stay out of situations that could lead to legal problems and possible suspensions. I don't care if they are the best player at their position, I wouldn't want a guy on the team who is a serious risk for facing a suspension because that talent on the field is useless sitting in the press box/crowd serving a suspension. Now we can all brush off the reported incidents that happened this offseason as nothing (Lynch "hit and Run", Hardy "alleged gun pointing", Roscoes DUI, etc), but do you really think that the NFL won't be keeping a little bit more of an eye on those players now? These guys won't be considered "first time offenders" to the NFL anymore And yes these incidents are distractions. It takes focus away from the team when the press is coming around trying to find out about what happened, or the police are showing up to question and they are forced to shut down practice early. Now they didn't end up being huge distractions (except for maybe the Lynch one) but they are still distractions.

Indian version of Hollywood (Not American Indian, India Indian), alot of singing and dancing

Sorry, I knew it was something like that, I think over the years its been modified when people quote it

He has the classic line "Every s*ck D*ck for crack?"

Wright could be released if he still isn't comprhending things (that was the knock on him late in the year from the coaches saying he wasn't grasping the playbook), and Omen could go to the PS

I don't know if it said anywhere that they stole teachers passwords to gain access For punishment, maybe they should also make them repeat their highschool education since they may have cheated all throughout

Just wait until they get hit with charges of being terrorists 38 years may seem harsh, but I don't disagree with most of the charges like burglary, and fraud Just wait thought, Microsoft or another computer company will have them lined up with 6 figure jobs when they get released to work for them with their skills