East Brady

What did the fed do to prevent it, answer, nothing. Yet the owners of the fed lost nothing. I guess you'd agree that Lincoln and many others were wrong also? Sad, very sad. Are you happy with that tax burden your passing on, courtesy of the left and right? Save the clinton good, bush bad nonsense. Carry on you great americans. Get to work now, there's tax's to be paid to the Fed. Hey maybe the fed will let us print some more money next week, then we the people can take on the loss's they create, we lose they win, that sounds like a good deal to me.

Yea that's it, we should be happy with a PRIVATE BANK that has raped this nation to the tune of TRILLIONS of dollars in interest, delivered the great depression, and made money off Hitler. What a great bunch of pigs we have running this country, and to think you guys sit here haggling over the phony left vs. right argument. I guess you guy's are all happy to owe those tax dollars to a private group of bankers, while debating the merits of a free market, or capitalism as you guys call it. Jefferson: "If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation then by deflation, the banks and the corporations will grow up around them, will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered." I guess he was just another dumb ass according to the guy's in this thread. Carry on you good americans. It's Top vs. Bottom. Thomas Jefferson, just another lunatic according to many around here, sad truly sad.

Typical response from those that fail to admit the truth. Nothing has changed has it? Next you'll be telling me that the Fed is owned by the people and we the people control it. Yet members of congress have stated repeatedly for damn near 100 years that, this is simply not the case. What has change today, nothing, we pay interest to a private bank for public money. I guess all those dead presidents were wrong in your world. The congressional record is full of information on the banking system, just because you can't believe it, doesn't make it false.

Read it and weep: The Federal Reserve debunked In recent American history, remarkable and knowledgeable authorities denounced the racket of the Federal Reserve. Here are some of their quotes: Wright Patman (1893-1976) was a Democratic representative from Texas, who served in the U.S. Congress from 1929 to his death on March 7, 1976. He was chairman of the House of Representatives Committee on Banking and Currency for 40 years. For 20 of those years, he introduced legislation to repeal the Federal Reserve Banking Act of 1913. Here are excerpts from what he said on September 29, 1941, as reported in the Congressional Record of the House of Representatives (pages 7582-7583): “When our Federal Government, that has the exclusive power to create money, creates that money and then goes into the open market and borrows it and pays interest for the use of its own money, it occurs to me that that is going too far. I have never yet had anyone who could, through the use of logic and reason, justify the Federal Government borrowing the use of its own money... I am saying to you in all sincerity, and with all the earnestness that I possess, it is absolutely wrong for the Government to issue interest-bearing obligations. It is not only wrong: it is extravagant. It is not only extravagant, it is wasteful. It is absolutely unnecessary. “Now, take the Panama Canal bonds. They amounted to a little less than $50,000,000 — $49,800,000. By the time they are paid, the Government will have paid $75,000,000 in interest on bonds of less than $50,000,000. So the Government is paying out $125,000,000 to obtain the use of $49,800,000. That is the way it has worked all along. That is our policy. That is our system. The question is: Should that policy be continued? Is it sane? Is it reasonable? Is it right, or is it wrong? If it is wrong, it should be changed. “Now, I believe the system should be changed. The Constitution of the United States does not give the banks the power to create money. The Constitution says that Congress shall have the power to create money, but now, under our system, we will sell bonds to commercial banks and obtain credit from those banks. “I believe the time will come when people will demand that this be changed. I believe the time will come in this country when they will actually blame you and me and everyone else connected with this Congress for sitting idly by and permitting such an idiotic system to continue. I make that statement after years of study. “We have what is known as the Federal Reserve Bank System. That system is not owned by the Government. Many people think that it is, because it says `Federal Reserve'. It belongs to the private banks, private corporations. So we have farmed out to the Federal Reserve Banking System that is owned exclusively, wholly, 100 percent by the private banks — we have farmed out to them the privilege of issuing the Government's money. If we were to take this privilege back from them, we could save the amount of money that I have indicated in enormous interest charges.” (End of Patman's 1941 speech.) Under Patman, a little booklet summarizing his views, in the form of questions and answers, called “A Primer On Money”, was prepared by the Sub-committee on Domestic Finance, House of Representatives, Committee on Banking and Currency — 88th Congress, 2nd session, August 4th, 1964. Here are excerpts: Q.: Who has the right to create money in the United States? A.: Under the Constitution, it is the right and duty of Congress to create money. It is left entirely to Congress. Q.: To whom has the Congress delegated this money-creating right? A.: To the banking system, that is, to the Federal Reserve System and to the commercial banks of the country. Q.: If the Government can issue bonds, why can't it issue money, and save the interest? A.: A few clear-headed and firm individuals, such as Abraham Lincoln, have insisted that the Government should. The late Thomas A. Edison stated the matter this way: If our Nation can issue a dollar bond, it can issue a dollar bill. The element that makes the bond good makes the bill good also. It is absurd to say that our country can issue $30 million in bonds, and not $30 million in currency. Both are promises to pay: but one promise fattens the usurer, and the other helps the people. However, it has long been one of the political facts of life that private banks must be allowed to create the lion's share of the money, even if not all of the money. Thus there is little opposition to the Government's printing bonds, and then permitting the banks to create the money with which to buy those bonds; but proposals that the Government itself create the money instead of the bonds have always set off tremendous political upheavals. For example, Abraham Lincoln set off a political furor when he insisted upon having the Government issue $346 million in money (the so-called “greenbacks”) instead of issuing interest-bearing bonds, and paying interest on the money. Q.: If the Government issued more money instead of Government bonds, isn't there a danger that the Government would issue too much money, and cause inflation? A.: No. It is no more or no less inflationary for the private banks to create $1 billion of new money than it is for the Government to create $1 billion of new money. Furthermore, as an agency of the Government, the Federal Reserve System decides in any case the total amount of money to be created. Louis Thomas McFadden (1876-1836) was chairman of the House Committee on Banking and Currency from 1920 to 1931. He said, on June 10, 1932: “We have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks, hereinafter called the Fed. The Fed has cheated the Government of these United States and the people of the United States out of enough money to pay the nation's debt. The depredations and iniquities of the Fed has cost enough money to pay the national debt several times over. ” Jack Metcalf, Washington State Senator for 20 years, and U.S. Congressman from 1995 to 2000, a republican senator in Washington, waged a war to abolish the Federal Reserve and restore to Congress its power to issue money, a power that is clearly stated in the U.S. Constitution: ”Our most basic document, the U.S. Constitution, states in Article 1, Section 8: `The Congress shall have the power to coin money and regulate the value thereof.' Nowhere is there the slightest hint of authorization to delegate that power even to another governmental institution — much less to a private banking system. That is absolutely outside the most broad interpretation possible.” In 1986, Metcalf single-handedly persuaded the National Conference of State Legislators to endorse unanimously a resolution urging states to challenge the constitutionality of the Federal Reserve. He wrote a book, “The 200-year debate”, and undertook a campaign to educate the population on the workings of the banking system. One of his favorite ways to explain the workings of the Fed is to tell the story of the “Federal Reserve saloon”: “Four cowboys put up their belongings as collateral to borrow a deck of cards. The hitch is that each of he four must bring back 14 cards at the and of be evening — a mathematical impossibility (there are only 52 cards in all, that is to say, 13 to each). In the end, one player ends up with only 10 cards and loses his belonging... that is the problem with be fed. It creates money to make loans the doesn't create the money to pay the interest.” The Fed= just another scam run by the Elite, top vs. bottom people.

As usual the Fed is protecting the elite at the expense of those on the bottom. They have avoided more than just a depression, it's called a Revolution, and most don't have the stomach to watch that. Just par for the course, the top 1/10th vs the bottom 99.9, this has been happening about every ten years now, like clock work. It's long past time to break out the shovels and pitch forks!! What's next another war, fought, bought, and paid for by the average guy to protect their rotten asses? Hey, I don't remember getting to vote for anyone associated with the Fed., yet they control all the money, and we get to pay for all their stupid greedy mistakes. Free market, thats like saying we have had fair elections in this country, they simply don't exist, never have. I live for the day I can watch the pigs at the top hiding in their ivory towers with their knee's knockin, F' them.

Thats too funny, thanks for the link, who's it gonna be this year?

Sept. 9 DENVER BRONCOS-W Sept. 16 @ Pittsburgh Steelers-W Sept. 23 @ New England Patriots-L Sept. 30 NEW YORK JETS-W Oct. 8 DALLAS COWBOYS-W Oct. 21 BALTIMORE RAVENS-W Oct. 28 @ New York Jets-L Nov. 4 CINCINNATI BENGALS-W Nov. 11 @ Miami Dolphins-W Nov. 18 NEW ENGLAND PATRIOTS-W Nov. 25 @ Jacksonville Jaguars-L Dec. 2 @ Washington Redskins-W Dec. 9 MIAMI DOLPHINS-W Dec. 16 @ Cleveland Browns-L Dec. 23 NEW YORK GIANTS-W Dec. 30 @ Philadelphia Eagles-W

Ha Ha Ha very funny ...........lets see Denver, I'll pencil that in as a W, and Pittsburgh with a new staff and alot of changes in their home opener, after an always tuff Cleveland game on the road in week one................................2-0 to start the season sounds about right to me..............have a nice off season, oh, I knew I bought those season tickets for a reason......all games will be sold out very early .....LOVE THE LOOKS OF THIS SCHEDULE!!!!!.....YA BABY!!!!!!!

No off the field problems, he just lets his pitbulls roam the hood and kill the neighbors shettland pony and then ships the dogs to california. Buys new dogs and they are now ripping the hood up and he has failed to pay the neighbors back for their loss. They are currently threating a lawsuit. Futhermore, he made reference's to K Winslow about him being gay, I don't know but, the haircut he's been sporting, is rather suspect in my book, but hey the guy is a maniac........Just don't think he fits Marv's mold......Next. I could be wrong but, didn't someone put a slug in his ass last year, causing him to miss some games??

Coy Wire??

Listening to the sirius broadcast, if you guys think Ralph Wilson talks out the side of his mouth, you should have a listen to the Blowhard owner in Miami sell the load of crap down he's sitting on.......The media is foaming at the mouth for Nick-O's ass and it coouldn't happen to a better guy!! Bummer for the media who bought the line of BS last spring and annointed the Fish the next superbowl champs!! Things are looking better everyday for the Bills......2 wins in the win column for next season, the Fins are officially rebuilding and now are stuuck with Nick-o's projects and the salary cap prob's they create.........WOOOOO! Media reports that Clepper has swelled to 285 lbs...nice!

Why, so we can watch running backs blow through the line again all season.... Guess you didn't see the game last sunday against Pittsburgh........He's done............. Next............... Unless your talking about the stuff in a cardboard box??

Saban is over rated look out for Mora..........

Why not have them battle it out with the Rock'em Sock'em Robots???

Well then how do we get him......I want that guy playing with Lee and JP....Looked like the next TO but smarter......Seemed like a class act from some of the tape they showed........Move up and draft him marv!!........He's built like a brick chit house. I haven't seen GT play all year, really like the looks of Calvin J.!! Top 3 pick, are you saying Detriot is going to get him and ruin another wide out??

I don't know but that 6'6" dude from Georgia Tech put on a show today ....is he a senior, the dude is built too.?????calvin johnson??

It was in one of the morning papers, at least thats where I first read it. Hey, Ralph wakes up New years Day 07 and suddenly has a thought. We've made progress from a year ago. Don't complain.

even better if you live in pittsburgh!! 2hrs.......45min..........5hrs........and then 4hrs.......I'm thinkin about it already!!! Already put the call in for the pitt game thats a done deal......will have to see some dates for the others.....

You are correct and I always get those smiths and thomas's mixed up, thanks for the spankin, my bad.

Kelso said as much on the radio broadcast, and in jp's defense, how is he supposed to throw the ball over the line on those routes over the middle to a reciever thats 5'2". You just can't hit parrish in the numbers when you have to throw over the lineman with their arms in the air.......We need another 2 quility rec's to go with Reed and Evans......

And with that extra second pick we could have drafted the SU saftey A. Thomas who can lay the lumber and also was ready to start from the get go.

That play by Balt. on 3rd down was chicken chit............. Lets drive it down there and take the lead ........

That was last year.

Maybe he should have stayed away from that jessica thing??

True but, in the real world your neck doesn't snap like a twig to often, and your leg doesn't explode, just for the hell of it.