Jump to content

Sig1Hunter

Community Member
  • Posts

    2,112
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Sig1Hunter

  1. If you watch the first video, EJ's first read is wide open (you have to watch it right as he releases the ball, his eyes were fixed on the receiver but shift over to his dump option to make the pass. The reciever he first looked at was coming across the middle wide open and he didn't go to him. We won but i'm just curious what was wrong with read 1 on that play? Would have gone for more than the dump yardage they ended up with on that play.

     

    Maybe he just wanted to go through his progressions just for the sake do doing so, as some here have suggested? Wouldn't want to be accused of staring down receivers, after all.

  2. @RapSheet

    The #Bills are releasing QB Jeff Tuel, source says. I guess with the signing of Kyle Orton it makes sense. They loved Tuel last camp tho

     

    If true, this is surprising to me. I would have thought that they would keep someone that knows the playbook behind EJ, in the event that he is hurt early on in the season. Once Orton was up to speed, then I figured that Tuel would be shown the door. I'm guessing he has a decent shot as PS, though, right?

  3.  

     

    Your reading comprehension is atrocious. I have never said that I think he should be criminally charged or that I want him charged. I've stated several times that I believe he will be charged.

     

    I provided you with facts explaining why someone will not be charged with excessive use of force for shooting too many times. You chose to wallow in your ignorance. What do I know? I've only been a cop for 15 years.

     

    Then, you say he will be charged because Holder "won't let it slide" and due to "public pressure". A poster called you out on this idiocy, and you denied it. You repeat your stupid, ignorant belief and refuse to provide any evidence to support it (hence, its ignorance). Now, if you didn't believe he should be charged wouldn't you listen to the voices of reason? You ignore them. Therefore, it is obvious that you believe he should be charged.

     

    My reading comprehension is fine.

  4.  

     

    The officer hasn't given his story publically yet as far as I know and the decision to charge or not will be based on evidence presented to a grand jury. If 9 of 12 of those people feel there is evidence to support a charge, he gets charged. The looters mean nothing. I'm simply stating what I think will happen. I believe he'll be charged.

     

    Are we back on the "he shot him too many times" thing again? I thought that I successfully debunked that belief of yours through rational thought and fact.

     

    If you have some other knowledge about the investigation that has not been shared, don't hold out on us. I'm interested to hear the facts that you are aware of that point to a grand jury indictment.

     

    In the more likely event that you are just talking out of your backside and making assumptions based on ignorance....well, please - dont let any of us get in your way.

  5. You may be 100% correct but back to my original point which is that I think the officer will ultimately be convicted of something. Highly likely he'll be charged if for no other reason than public pressure and I can see a plea or some conviction from there. The whole thing sucks for all involved.

     

    Ladies and gentlemen, your jury pool. Ignorance is bliss, eh?

     

    BTW - Sheriff Grady Judd of Polk County Sheriffs Office in Florida was asked why his deputies shot 110 rounds at a suspect that had just killed a deputy and a police dog in 2006. His response:

     

    "I suspect the only reason 110 rounds was all that was fired was that's all the ammunition they had," Judd said. "We were not going to take any chance of him shooting back."

     

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/2006/10/01/florida-police-shot-suspected-cop-killer-68-times/

     

    Sometimes it takes 1, sometimes it takes 110. You shoot to stop the threat. Don't like it, I suggest that you don't attack armed citizens or cops.

  6. There seems to be evidence that supports a use of force by the officer, but at what point is it excessive? Shoot him in the legs.

     

    Seriously? You watch too many movies, my friend. The police are not trained to shoot in the arms or the legs - it is extremely difficult in dynamic situations, and it is a very poor tactic if your objective is shoot to stop the threat. Center mass is the primary target.

×
×
  • Create New...