Jump to content

Sig1Hunter

Community Member
  • Posts

    2,112
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Sig1Hunter

  1.  

    The argument is that due process is not currently being applied equally. This is what lies at the root of the issue.

     

     

    It's not as much as it is being applied in an unequal fashion, as certain attorneys are better at their jobs. Being better at your job means that you can charge more money for your services. Any public defender is able to make sure that due process is followed within the criminal justice system. The "root" of the issue is much deeper than that.

  2.  

     

    Check out some studies on the differences in sentencing between white and minority defendants. No one (well at least not me) is making the argument that LEO are herding up innocent minorities and twisting their mustaches, but there is a long history of inequality in the eyes of the justice system.

     

    Look at the differences in sentencing (since changed) between crack cocaine and powdered cocaine. Harsher sentences for crack (the cheaper drug) virtually sanctioned inequality under the eyes of the law, guaranteeing he poorest would be punished the most.

     

    Poor white people can't afford competent legal representation. Wealthy black people can. Poor white guy is more likely to be found guilty and receive a harsher sentence. Who is arguing this reality? It's a given. What role does race play? None.

  3.  

     

    Take a random quote from KAJ superficial piece, like this one, "Worse, certain politicians and entrepreneurs conspire to keep the poor just as they are.."

     

    Now, tell me which party is the one who benefits the most by keeping the minorities in a different social and economic class? Which party has had a stranglehold of the voting blocks in the poorest urban communities for the last two generations? How has that worked out? If KAJ talks about the education gap, whose fault is it that urban schools have much higher absence and drop out rates?

     

    Exactly which entrepreneurs profit by keeping 15% of the population below median income levels? Who's fault is it that a large number of minorities don't have a basic bank account or credit card?

     

    The same ones who have apparently brainwashed the poor among us to believe that a payday loan is a good idea?

  4. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VdL9dqkyjhM

     

    Scroll to 6:29 on the video and listen to the background audio. The guy in the background seems to be describing the incident to someone else. They seem oblivious to the fact that Mr. Worldstar is recording. The events described are in substantial conflict with the narrative given by Dorian Johnson, Brown's accomplice in the robbery (and the same narrative adopted as truth by the MSM). Weird.

     

    I had to ask myself, why would that guy in the background give a bogus version of the truth? Why would Mr. Worldstar give a bogus version of the truth? Which version is more trustworthy? If the background guy's version of events is more trustworthy, and it matches up substantially with what Officer Wilson has said, is a police officer justified in shooting a 6'4 285lb robbery suspect that is charging him and that had, apparently, just wrestled with him in the patrol car over possession of the officer's gun?

     

    http://www.ijreview.com/2014/08/168698-eyewitness-recalls-important-detail-background-video-mins-ferguson-shooting/

  5.  

     

    The video camera helped bring that about. Rodney King was tip of ice berg in the recording of usually "silent" events. And now we see more and more charges against people and cops for tampering with video evidence like we saw with at the Molly's Pub incident in Buffalo that involved cops

     

    Cameras were a major impetus for the change no doubt. With the proliferation of cameras, now the issue is with selective editing and the monday morning quarterbacking of cops by people who have no earthly idea of what they are seeing, but by golly they have an opinion on it.

     

    If only we had a body cam on this cop, this mess could have been avoided. Something deep down (common sense?) tells me he didnt gun down a man who posed no immediate threat "execution style" in broad daylight in front of 25 witnesses.

  6. Just so that everyone understands the difference: Racial profiling is illegal. Criminal profiling is not illegal, and is an excellent tool in the arsenal of a law enforcement officer.

     

    Law enforcement agencies go to GREAT lengths to make sure that their officers are not engaging in racial profiling. Some people fail to understand that law enforcement agencies are run by uber liability conscious bean counters. They are not run by hard charging street cops. The bean counters do every thing in their power to make sure that the agency, and by proxy the city/county/state, is free from any kind of civil or criminal liability. Policies are written. Redundant policies are written. Data collection programs capture the stats regarding the age/race/sex of every person stopped. In car cameras, and in some places body cameras, record the contact and every word said. It's funny. So many people talk about how cops aren't the same today as they were 30 years ago. They are right, we aren't. Racial profiling was rampant then. People were beaten by police, and no reports written with no questions asked. Today's police force is better equipped, more efficient, and more professional.

     

    Racial profiling is a serious, serious allegation that usually ends up with the officer being fired and the city/county/state doling out massive amounts of dollars. I am not saying that some cops don't do it. We have our bad apples, but it is not nearly at the level that some people insist that it is because they have gone on a couple of ride alongs.

  7.  

     

    Wrong.

    EJ stared down all of his receivers, so badly, that if you go and look at his last batted pass, the defender dropped away from his rush and was able to get his hands up to knock EJs pass down.

     

    Since when is throwing to your first read "staring down your receiver"? Its a quick slant pattern. If its open you throw it. There is no "looking off a safety" on a three step slant. The o-line know the play, or they should, so they need to keep the d-lines hands down. Some people are making this a lot more complicated than it should be. That deep ball to MW was a thing of beauty, and is enough to encourage me about EJ going into Carolina.

  8. I'm sure that they could make it happen. It just feels like a missed opportunity.

     

    I thought I heard Marrone say in a recent press conference that the team wouldn't be attending the festivities, but that team "representatives" would. They had some other things in mind for the team. Or, something to that effect.

  9. The link makes it sound like it's the Chief receiver of the same name--anyone know if that's the case?

     

    Yes, its the Chiefs receiver.

     

    "Injuries may eventually help the Chiefs thin their crowd at wide receiver. Veteran Kyle Williams was the latest receiver to leave practice because of a hamstring injury. He pulled up while running a route and immediately grabbed his leg. Williams was having a strong camp but an extended absence might force the Chiefs to turn elsewhere for receiving help."

     

    http://espn.go.com/blog/kansas-city-chiefs/post/_/id/6746/chiefs-camp-report-day-9?ex_cid=espnapi_public

×
×
  • Create New...