Doc

What a douche.

No. If tariffs are even between countries it has nothing to do with China. An example I heard was Vance trying to get India to not buy energy from China. Not sure how accurate that was but that would be targeting China.

No, not at all. Unless we're starting new wars with them. Which as far as I know we're not planning on doing.

Reducing tariffs between the US and other countries doesn't target China.

👇

Good luck with celibacy!

What were they waiting for? It's not like China suddenly became a threat.

And the last Admin didn't? You think Mayor Pete was qualified to be Secretary of Transportation?

I rarely see movies based on who is in them. If it's a good movie, I'll watch it.

Yeah, it sounded bad initially. Basically China will be targeting any country that makes a deal with the US to screw them over and not just balance trade/tariffs. And that's fair.

He wasn't my first choice. But with recruiting at 15 year highs, the restoration of standards and his first successful mission despite the left getting vapors over a chat group, he's doing fine so far. Much better than the last guy.

This should be a far bigger scandal than it's been. You see how apoplectic the left got over Trump's height and weight being listed as 6'3" and 225#, but Biden being demented and people covering for it and "ho hum."

BTW, I keep hearing people claiming that Signal is insecure. But have seen no corroboration. I did a search and the first article says that no one, not even Signal, can intercept your messages because of end-to-end encryption.

No, I was upset at the one-sidedness of the whole thing. Taking classified material was a common occurrence and either you charge everyone or no one, unless something nefarious was done with the information. And now that it's been discovered to be a problem, you fix it and make sure it doesn't happen again. This is rich considering the incompetence of the last 4 years.

I don't really care that Garland appointed Hur because Hur threw them a bone by saying that despite Biden willfully retaining classified material for years, that he wouldn't charge him because he was senile. I mean, we all knew he had classified material and that he knew it because he kept it in his garage. And I even said the report didn't really tell us anything we didn't already know (save for him showing it to his ghost writer) and that the most damning part of it was Hur calling him senile because of the implications for the upcoming election. But as I maintained all along, I didn't care who had classified material just as long as they weren't doing anything nefarious with it, as this seemed to be a common thing among those high up in the government. Meaning you either charge both or neither.

Been there, done that. And I took it as "WR from the past at the point in their career when they joined the Bills," which is why I took Moulds (although I should have also said Reed). Lofton and TO were on the back end of their careers.

No. I wasn't the one who used the term to excuse Biden's illegal possession of classified material.

You know, I really like that Josh Allen kid in the draft...

How about...they all lie when it fits their agenda?

So now they're claiming Trump is a Xi puppet? LOL!

I'm not a believer. But best of luck on Wednesday.

Call it “spillage,” make sure it doesn’t happen (again) and move on.

The only things anyone should care about is that military recruiting is up, standards have been restored and his first mission was a success. Clarifying who is on/added to a chat is procedural stuff that can be addressed and means nothing in the grand scheme of things. I mean, when the bar is "ho hum, so what if 13 service members got killed..."

Thanks but I'll wait for something to happen first. Fool me once...

Failure? LOL! Military recruiting is the highest its been in 15 years and standards have been restored. The first mission was a success despite accidentally adding an American (hostile, true) reporter. This "Signalgate" is only a scandal in your minds.