nero47

i believe that they are also talking to each other as to where our offensive strengths ly. notice the running game having presidence over the passing game, but setting up the pass perfectly. These two definitely have the no-huddle figured out. On other thing, has anyone noticed in both games, we have stopped our offense ourselves.

if you watched the play the defensive player was blocked into the back of his legs. Unfortunate, but does no make him injury prone.

However, living here in Daytona Beach, I will get to see the game this week at home on cable, possibly the Miami game in two weeks unless jacksonville conflicts. I like it. HD rocks!!

+1

pat*s brought out SBXXV defense and we scored 17 pts in 22 minutes. our problem was Defense not getting off the field. This O is going to get better as the season moves forward. A very painful mistake cost us. Shades of wide right.

Sorry, but the defense's job is to give the ball back to the O. If they want off the field, then play like it. Stop 3rd downs.

Get over it. What we discovered is that we have a pretty good team that made as mistake at the end. However, this offense is going to move the football. The defense has to get off the field, and Special teams will come around. Remember we were picked to lose by 10 or more.;

without prep. speech don't mean nuttin'

preseason had no coordination. i believe Schonert was being deliberately obtuse, based on his dislike of jauron's desires. it may be AVP calling the plays, but the Book he's using is the same. My understanding is we will be simplifying and speeding up. That alone should slow the defense. Also, I haven't seen slants since the HOF game. Against NE they should work well, especially with TO back in the lineup.

Agree there will be no tendencies to look at, but most teams work on keys at the line. Who's positioned where? Who's coming in? What "package" they're using? etc. However if the offense is simplified by using a true no huddle, there shouldn't be any personnel changes during a drive or very little. If this offense under AVP plays fast and efficient, Bellichick* Defensive short commings will become apparent (new 4-3 with weak secondary). Could be shootout, in which case we lose close. Less than 7.

1. The starting O is performing terribly and many on this board are upset and want something done about it, otherwise we're doomed. 2. This team, according to many, is destined for 2-14, 4-12, etc. Take you pick. 3. Now, the HC fires the OC (who isn't getting the job done) and the many go ballistic, because he doesn't hire a "bonafide" new OC, but puts the O in the hands of a person who is familiar with it and never been an OC at this level. Is that what's bothering you Bunky? Heck you should be glad all was lost anyway. Now the board should be relatively clear for talking football, instead of listening to all the wannabe coaches. OBTW Have you all sent your resume's to OBD yet?

Your job is to provide the boss with what he wants. Make lemonade from lemons. Obviously, it would appear that "what we have here, is a failure to communicate". (Cool Hand Luke)

i watched his sorry play against the steelers and his comments confirm it.

A few words to Dominic. You have been in this league long enough to bust your butt and get on anyone else who isn't. You're not some rookie!! If you have to wait for a coach to get on your tail, then just pack it in. Plays were there to be made. Players have to make them. The coach can draw them up, but players have to execute.

htttp://www.atdhe.net

The impression I'm getting is that we are not game planning at this point. The purpose is to run various plays related to down and distance regardless of the D against them, therefore no audibles. Secondly, our D is so Vanilla calling it bland would be an overstatement. This week we should see a true audition of things to come. Excess players should be gone. JMO

Watching the game last night, i would have to say that the Packers did come in with a partial game plan. (Nothing wrong with that). Unfortunately we didn't. Did anyone else notice that we didn't run any slants with the first team receivers?

Typo repaired. Thank You

Watching Garrard and the time he takes, even our pass rush would look good. part of our problem last year was taking too long to deliver the ball.

Right. 2 wins in the division. now two more and we're in the playoffs. Whew this season's getting easier all the time.

If either of these teams were our beloved Bills, Ths Board woulwould be going insane with what they saw. No consistency, poor blocking, poor tackling. Timing off most of the time. Pennington looked out of sync, unless he was dinking the ball. Garrard looked awful. oh yea and BTW, hy only played through the first quarter. I guess preseason really doesn't mean much

I have a suggestion for this year. have the moderators set up a separate thread each week after a close loss so the coaching experts among us can explain which play we would have called to win the game or how we would have strategized the game. Then everyone would have the benefit of our incredible insights.

Just throw away the entire offseson and put in a new offense. Yeah, that's the ticket.

Since I Live in Daytona Beach....................... I would have to switch to the NFC and follow the Buccaneers. Attachment to the Bills in another city wouldn't work unless it was Orlando.

Agree on no. 1 Watched HOF game again today. Noticed front getting some pressure, but also noticed Tenn using two and three step drops on completed short passes. Anything that took a five or seven step drop Collins was pressured into incompletions. ( Check first drive.) Biggest thing I would like to see is Ellison replaced. Weakest link on defense. 2nd, Mc kelvin need to play football, not second guess the receivers route. ( See 3rd and 15 on second drive. he was turned and going downfield while the receiver was catching the ball in open space for the killing first down.) I expect the O-line to be much sharper. Should be interesting to see O without TO