who is better? trent or jp, jp or trent, who cares.
jp has not had many good/great weapons to use while he was the starter. and you know what, to bad for him. he lost the job and that's that.
trent has a good chance to make it as he does have some good/great weapons to work with. good for him. he has the job and thats that.
any players success is not solely based on skills, but timing of the players career (imo).
would montana have been a hof player without rice, taylor,craig?
would kelly have been a hof player without reed, thomas,lofton?
would brady be as good as he is without the video camera?
success in any sport is all timing. jp may have had a better career if he would have stayed in school and come out a year later.
maybe with the weapons kelly had, vince ferragamo would have had a hof career(doubtful)
too many people are still cought up in jp vs trent, trent vs jp and i cant understand why.
the bills are quietly building a solid team at the perfect time.
the pats* are getting to be very old, and i think it's only a matter of time before their older players start to break down, and their video camera has already run out of tape.
the fish are in total chaos, and i feel this is the team tuna can not turn around.
the jets are hit or miss every year for the last 5 or so seasons. not very consistant.
i was a jp supporter, but have come to realize his timing may not have been right.
trent's may be.
too bad for one, good for the other, and if it works out, it'll be great for bills fans, if not, so be it