mike22nc

Then you are fine saying the only chance you are going to have is a successful onside kick rather than either a successful onside kick OR getting the ball back with limited time after being able to call 3 defensive timeouts. I don't need to do the math on it to know which one is better decision. Again, it isn't subjective.

But you are objectively wrong...

McDermott's press conference happening right now is a disaster. He doesn't understand.

It sure is fun having Josh Allen as the QB of the Buffalo Bills.

Your job as the head coach is to maximize your ability to have a chance at that point. He made sure they didn't with that timeout decision. How difficult is that to understand?

Is he not a head coach that specializes on the defensive side of the ball? What benefit did he provide to the Buffalo Bills today?

It wasn't, it was 4th and 7 if we declined

How does McDermott look Josh in the eye after this?

That was the dumbest goddamn call. Why on earth would you accept that penalty?

Nooooo!

Maybe it would be good to have a 1st round talent active rather than a former UB Bull?

I don't even care if we lose at this point, it's so fun watching Josh Allen play football every week.

If Allen brings us back, can they award the MVP in December?

This loss, if it is one, doesn't bother me much. I still expect Allen to outscore anyone on any given day.

There Rapp goes again with the friendly fire.

Not for nothing, sometimes the other team just plays great. We've had overall pretty decent coverage on Nacua and Kupp on some of these plays and they've made ridiculous catches. Gotta tip your cap to them.

Gotta stop blitzing.

I hate that 3rd down call. Looked like the Rams were basically giving the Bills a 1st down if we run to the right side.

I'm not generally a reactionary fan. Am I wrong or is it likely that Davis is better than Cook? Good to have them both, but the rookie is for real.

Disclaimer: I think this comment means I'm officially getting old. Does it get on anyone else's nerves when a defender makes a tackle after an objectively positive offensive play and they celebrate like they did something? I hate it when Bills do it, I hate it when the other team does it, i just hate it.

Why did we go from using exact numbers to rounding, and where did 54% come from? This isn't a good faith argument, so you're just a troll at this point.

Did the 51.6% come when he had 63 targets in 16 games, or perhaps was that when he received 93 targets in 15 games? If you think your response supports your argument, you don't know what you're looking at. Put another way, if he instead received 140 targets rather than 93 that year, which direction do you think his catch % would have moved?

Why do you expect the catch percentage to not be dependent upon targets per route run? It would not be linear. As more targets are allocated to Gabe, I would expect his catch percentage to decrease. He is thrown the ball when he gets open/creates separation. If he isn't either good at getting separation or good at contested catches, he isn't thrown the ball. If you throw him the ball more in the situations where he's closely guarded, he will catch less. There are so many variables that go into it that you thinking you can look at catch percentage and extrapolate from there is a joke. You are using Travis Hunter logic. There actually is quite a bit that is tricky about that math.

He belongs on the team and has a role. He shouldn't sniff the starting lineup of a team with aspirations to win playoff games.

It would (or should as long as he isn't extended) be a 1-year rental. There is no guaranteed money due after this year.