leh-nerd skin-erd

What was your monthly cost for your plan….and is it a single or family plan?

His thread title: Just. Imagine. If. This. Was. Hunter. Biden. My response: ….if I was to imagine this was Hunter Biden…. His response: 🤯 Tedious. Devoid of value. But you knew all that.

Oh, gosh, my auto correct changed my words too. I initially typed how brave it was for you to expose your intellectual vulnerabilities while at the same time revealing your own prodigious bigotry.

Leon is proof that in spite of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, not all Head is good head. “We all know you can go places and fine China Town etc.” Perfect, or as you might say, “Perr Fickt”.

Good call, sir.

I’m thinking this poster is BillStime 3.0.

Where money, power and influence are involved, it usually comes back to money, power and influence.

Profit motive and an exceptionally strong lobbying efforts.

It’s not odd at all, I used the features available on the site to block your notifications. I find your process tedious and devoid of value. However, if I was to imagine this was Hunter Biden, Joe Biden or anyone else in the liberal tree, you’d be firmly in their corner no questions asked. Thank you.

Bannon isn’t your problem, Andy. Whether he believes what he says or not, he’s a provocateur poking issues with a stick and riling folks like you up. There are people who do that on the left, too. Your problem is you lost independents and folks who look at the policies you support (and likely see as centrist) and rejected the platform in large enough numbers to put Trump in office. You moved a few steps toward the extreme and likely don’t even know it.

I'm doing well. I pretty much always am. Thank you for asking. As for believing her, gosh, 4th, who knows? She clearly had trauma in her life and on a human level, it's impossible not to feel badly for her. She's not here to tell her story, so it's up to you to make up your own mind. From my perspective--Geo Clooney is quite popular with the dems, and was pretty tight with Harvey Weinstein back in the day--so it wouldn't surprise me to find out he was swimming in murky waters. Could be on the other hand he had a one off completely unrelated to Epstein, or he was deeply involved and one of the reasons Biden didn't release. Or, maybe it's all made up.

Do you think this is why the Dems have shut down the government? To impact SNAP benefits and reduce access to groceries? It tracks with Harris fear-mongering on COVID vaccines at the height of the pandemic.

Geo Clooney, powerful, wealthy influencer of Democrats, you’re up. https://nypost.com/2025/10/26/world-news/ghislaine-maxwell-claimed-she-performed-sex-act-on-george-clooney-virginia-giuffres-memoir-alleges/

He did kick those Russian diplomats out on December 29, 2016. Sure, it was about 20 minutes before he left office, but it was a powerful, powerful statement.

Have they counted the ballots in the U-Haul box under the card table at the back of Buenos Aires Senior Center yet?

Yes. Pretending corporations steer clear of Dem political wrath by taking a hard, moral stand would be silly. Let’s not do that. Or that it simply made sense to donate in improving the WH for the greater good, which is good business generally.

It's almost a prerequisite for democrat AGs in NYS.

I am seeing criticism of the selection because there was no exhaustive search, one quoted individual who is trying to be optimistic, one (potential cowardly lion) who speaks anonymously and references a “gut punch” and, and general concerns about politicization of science. As for accepting the statements on the most respected scientists and publications, I would love to trust without question. I don’t do that anymore after learning our governments most respected scientists apparently participated in dangerous research, partnering with hostile foreign govts, and likely allowed a very dangerous virus to escape a lab and bring the world to its knees. I can understand the desire to see a thorough search and placement of a vetted individual, but as others have pointed out, this isn’t all that unusual at all. We both agree to hope he’s honorable, qualified and successful in his role, yes?

I can understand how difficult this must be for her. I do wonder what Chelser's dad feels more badly about--that he didn't spend more time in the East Wing, or more time in Monica Lewinsky?

That could be the larger problem as you see it. The problem here seems to be an attempt at deception by members of the Canadian government and the fallout that has ensued.

I never really have an issue with a political campaign using a song to generate excitement, but some artists take issue with it. I think we need to defer to the Ronald Reagan Foundation who has a much different take than you do. And yikes...$75,000,000 in ad buys to influence the American political system? Less than the Russians, I suppose, but still. https://www.reaganfoundation.org/ Continuing his legacy.
 Sharing his principles. As the sole nonprofit organization created by President Reagan, we are charged with advancing his legacy and principles – individual liberty, economic opportunity, freedom and democracy, peace through strength, and national pride.

I admit I was more comfortable when the world class grifter and his family established very close connections to our adversaries in China and targeted a single Ukrainian to run cover for a president's addict son, and a billion dollars in hush money. Still, what specifically are you calling out with respect to your comment that he is "not qualified for this position"? I'd think the position is largely administrative, overseeing a team, a budget just shy of a billion dollars, and an awful lot of moving parts.

4thy and crew like their authoritarians in blue.

It was your contention that the $376m was well spent on wallpaper and basketball courts, not mine. I was just thinking about the history and tradition associated with the WH tennis courts. It just seemed like a ton of money spent in our house, and that’s before it’s adjusted for inflation. I’d think there was more to it than just the very important basketball court, but I would definitely bet there were some well-connected corporations and individuals with ties to the party in power making a boatload of money on the remodel. I think the latest talking point offered, that current and future First Ladies/Gentlemen have to work on old card tables in an abandoned maintenance room with leaky pipes in the basement of the West Wing is pretty silly, to be honest. I’m not a big fan of Dr Jill’s contributions, but beyond that there’s a place for all.

$376m for some interior decorations and a basketball court paid for by the people? In 2010? It really sounds like fiscal irresponsibility was the real issue. Btw, I didn’t think to be upset about that at the time, but can you imagine the history associated with that tennis court?