leh-nerd skin-erd

Transparency: I used to feel that exchanging thoughts with you was a worthwhile endeavor. As with all posters, I assume they are who they say they are with respect to occupation, education, background or whatever they choose to share. It just makes things easier. Over the past couple months, I've noticed that you seem to have trouble keeping track of things you've posted a just day(s) or weeks earlier. I've withheld commentary on that because it seems unsporting, and beyond that, what's the harm? However, this, coupled with your prolific penchant for puffery has caused me to reconsider the value of what you offer. Thank you again.

Thank you.

Sometimes it's helpful to remember the old adages: "Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words can really offend me." Good for you, Andy, for standing up for those voters, uh, bullied in some way, um, by the use of a word that, uh, is used frequently without offense, in a non-bullying fashion to um, describe an economic outcome. #outlawbloodbath ✊

The combo includes discounts on the bypass surgery, I assume?

Frankish is the inflation whisperer, a water bottle shamer, a fish trafficker and notorious supporter of the slaughter of salmon. He's complicated, Frank is.

Just joking, badly it would seem. Glad to hear you weren’t.

WHAT THE…..? Now I think you actually should be banned.

That goes both ways here, literally across the board. It’s what happens on anonymous boards, less so in real life for what seem to be obvious reasons. Try not to take it personally.

I was wondering what happened to that thread. That sort of thing gets someone banned? What a strange field of sensitive flowers we occasionally walk in.

I didn't suggest that, that's your imagination working against you. As for being symptom free, all I can tell you is he had blood in his eye, which isn't nothing, it's something.

For the purists among us, it should be noted that Joe Biden does not have laser beams in his eyeballs, nor do his eyes glow red like a Terminator during speeches. He did suffer a ruptured eye gasket during a debate in 2019, leading many on the left to believe he is a liberal cyborg sent to save the world. That theory has largely been debunked.

It's all a matter of degrees to me. I speak to people all the time with differences of opinion, and remain unscathed. When the occasional conversation gets a bit more heated, someone typically ratchets it back. If I encounter a live wire, I'm no more inclined to engage than if I heard my neighbor raging about the state of the world through his kitchen window. I have told this story before, but I had a nice, long conversation with David Paterson when he was Lt Govt. Nice guy, all other things being equal, I certainly would have considered voting for him. Part of the conversation dealt with political discourse, respectful dialogue and how he tried to bridge divides. Peace Mupster.

I follow ya, Frank. We all have our cartoon line(s) in the sand. I used to get crazy mad about Lucy pulling the football away from Charlie Brown. I guess to Charles M. Schulz, a million or so head injuries per year was something funny.

When you have a president who can't recall which world leaders he spoke to in 1986 v 2024, who is living, who is not, with a history of falsehoods, who makes up words just about every third speech, who is one step away from a fall and fractured hip, and who cannot remember what year(s) he was VP, and who has lost track of when (and where) his son died (not to mention the dozen or so questionable past and ongoing issues he brings to the table)..with tons of folks telling us how sharp and dialed in the guy is....it's the cartoon meme that represents the assault on common sense. 🫥

This is purely a stylistic observation. I believe that 'that time of the month' humor/shot plays much better in the moment than in this type of setting. Using the caricature of Archie Bunker again, I can understand as men of that era started their workday, a co-worker or foreman gives them a hard time, and "Gee Stan, is it that time of the month again?" followed. Sure as night follows day, uproarious laughter follows, maybe a red face or two as well. The point is, the, uh, flow was there. In this case, you, again in the Archie Bunker role, see the opening, analyze several possible replies, decide to head home, grab the IBM Selectric and type up the best zinger of the time. You realize you're out of envelopes, head to Woolworths, buy a box, grab a pack of Juicy Fruit from the counter, and head home. The next day, you stop at the post office, but a .07c stamp, drop it in the mail, and...7 days later I open the mailbox (I was on vacation in the Poconos), open the letter and BAM! message delivered. On the other hand, sequels and remakes are all the rage in Hollywood these days. Kudos to you for carving your own laborious path. If you were concerned with mental health issues of this magnitude, why bother with the backstory of Timothee-cee and the French lass? Why not just get to the point? I'll consider your perspective, as I generally try to do. I recognize my perspective is shaped by my experience, and I'm comfortable with that. As for who(m) adjudicates what, Kay, we're a nation of laws (sometimes) and I'll continue to make my voice heard to the extent I can do that. That does not mean I want vulnerable women seeking backroom abortions, it simply means that I look at, and perhaps value more, the child in the womb at 8 months and 4 days than someone else might. Kay, I wouldn't want to talk about student loan forgiveness if I were you, either. It's not one of your boogeymen. We all have them. Student loan debt in your generation (and others) starts with a decision on the personal level to assume debt where it might not necessarily otherwise be incurred. Why and how that happens is complicated and multi-faceted, and certainly reasonable people can disagree about solutions, but that's the fact, jack. This is the problem with some of your generation, you're soft. Throw a pre-measured tide pod in the wash, rinse, and reuse. It might even reduce your carbon footprint.

Chubb to Putin, Putin to Omaha Steaks, Omaha steaks to Omaha, Omaha to Warren Buffet, Warren Buffet to Berkshire Hathaway, Berkshire Hathaway to Geico, ergo, CHUBB➡️Putin➡️Geico.

Da. Word is he put up the bond, paid for his car insurance and bought insurance on a new snowmobile. Well, not new new, new to him. It’s a 2018.

The Chubb group being part of the Russia n cabal is breaking new ground. Rumor is breaking news is forthcoming: Flo from Progressive will be revealed as Flonozka Ivanonovich, head of a Kremlin backed sleeper cell. Trust no one. Question everything.

Mup, I’ll jump in here. I agree with you that there are larger problems than a confused old man screwed up the name of a young lady who’s horrific murder resulted, in part, from the failures of his administration, and administrations past. On the other hand, that’s the way the game is played, and he’s been a key player for decades. He didn’t care enough to commit the name to memory, didn’t care enough to think of her family and the pain it would cause them, or lacked the ability to retain it. Biden was very, very effective as the Scranton tough guy back in the day. His famous “Malarkey” and challenging people to push up contests. One of the funnier things has been to watch rush to his defense as he can no longer handle himself. Bottom line—he &$#@ed it up, will be called on it. He’d be first in line if it was someone else.

George, 311 on the Social Security "Names with gumption!" list. Nikki, 37. Sidebar: Floyd, 718. Haley, Heighleigh, Haylay and all other iterations, 26. On the bright side, I now know a Lincoln, if only virtually!

I agree with this. I think Frank is a very good poster, but this was not his finest work. A few years ago, I was introduced in a professional setting to a lady with three children. She directed her boys to say hello to me, and said "This is Crayden...this is Brayden....and this is Greg.". I was able to recall each name, and address each lad by his name, even while wondering how the **** she came up with Greg. Unorthodox af if you ask me.

There's nothing for me to get over, Frank. You brought your thoughts on the burden of Biden having to unravel the DaVinci code of names to me. I'll go back to my initial point, which is that his flubbing of the name of a young lady he doesn't care about, who's death he likely viewed only as politically inconvenient for him, and who won't give a thought about moving forward is indicative of the dog and pony show these things are. That crosses the political spectrum, and for all those R politicians complicit in the clusterf*ck that is the southern border, they are doing the same thing.

I have exactly as many friends named Lincoln as I do Laken. I'm also going to go out a limb here and assume that if I was giving a speech, viewed by millions, with professional speechwriters doing the heavy lifting, and the knowledge that a particular name was going to be on particular importance, I could solve the mystery that is "Laken". I do appreciate you removing any lingering doubt in your mind that you are indeed an attorney, the checking of the social security admin listing the top 1000 names was quite lawyerly. It doesn't change the fact that "Laken" was the only one he needed to recall. Personally, Frankish, if I were prepping President Biden, I would have recommended he avoid searching the social security website at all, or googling "unorthodox baby names", and simply said "Mr. President, think Lake with an N. Lake-uhnnnn. Lake--uhn. Laken.".

Gerizoppious Konstatovichstein is an unorthodox name. "Laken" and "Riley" would seem to be a walk in the park in a speech by the President to the nation. Complete d-baggery.

My goodness you're closed-minded. You should consider changing your screen name to Comrade Archie Bunker. "Right wing propaganda"? I "entered a female reproductive rights thread"? Based on your approach to issues, you closely approximate the mindset of a 1950s dad getting off second shift at the plant going home and mumbling "My house, my rules!". I offered thoughts on abortion, and the juxtaposition between abortion to birth and a 15 week ban. I don't control how you perceive that, nor your decision to drag Trump into it--that was your choice. I appreciated your feedback on the workaround the French have in place, that's how we learn. Again, I assumed there was a mechanism in place for extreme situations, but that was not the point of my initial post. On doctor's notes, I'm good with my perspective. Your thoughts regarding consultation with multiple doctors, if accurate, only reinforces my belief. Whatever 'pretending' that follows exists only in the four square corners of your mind. On your point on anxiety and depression, I think I was quite clear on my feelings regarding abortion in the 8th month. From the perspective of the pregnant person, I understand. From the perspective of the child, I do not. What can I tell you beyond that? As for the obligatory (::::yaaaaaawnnnnn::::) tax question, my feeling is that with the unfathomable amount of money collected through tax, there's already plenty flowing through the system to address many (if not all) of the important societal issues we face. I would certainly favor, for example, redirecting Biden's student loan boondoggle to assist people in this regard. Would you? Pleasure speaking with you. On some level, I suppose, I missed your three hour lectures.