leh-nerd skin-erd

This would have a lot more oomph if your candidates didn’t include a former president/sexual predator who settled a massive civil suit with a sexual assault victim, or a prior candidate who happened to be his wife who enabled the sh3t out of him and is quite well known for victim blaming, or the last president who acknowledged he was touching women and making them uncomfortable, who was also credibly accused of a violent sexual assault against apparently the one woman in the world you didn’t believe in the #believeher campaign. Of course this is nothing new—come to think of it…that guy…the liberal lion you all loved so much, the one who left an intern in his car when he flipped it into a bay and left her there for 10 hours—he’s one of the greats. As for Trump and his civil case, the law designed to protect victims of sexual crimes long in the past makes complete sense emotionally, but is problematic given how our system of justice works. I have no idea what happened is at all, but Trump was quite clear on his position and went to jury instead of settling. That’s unlike the former president mentioned above, who actually was one of the Dems selected headliners for Harris 24 in one of the strangest flip flops on the history of politics. As for Maxwell, again, giving bad people opportunities for a better criminal outcome in exchange for information and names is done frequently. I feel like you’re concerned about your people getting caught up in it all again.

Let’s see where the criminal referrals take us. Worst case scenario is that a few folks spend some big dollars on lawyers, maybe get embarrassed a bit but ultimately remain free. I think though, there’s much more to be gained. If it’s as simple as”politics is a dirty business” then it makes sense to press the dirty business from a position of power. I believe the Dems way overplayed the Trump to Prison card, fair minded people knew it was political bs and as a result Trump prevailed at the ballot box. That is to say…for all the hoopla about Trump as a felon, and Trump as a classified document provocateur, fair minded people saw through that and other bs and the Dems lost what little credibility they had outside their fervent base. So, now, the Rs should reveal all the shady sh8t Obama et al did in the Russia+ era and leverage the distrust. Hit the Dems. Hit the media sycophants. Tell the story to the public. Continue to declassify. And, let the chips fall where they may.

I have no idea what my problem is. I think it’s out of my system now.

20 points brings you to 84. The defense rests.

Westy obviously has the fine features that Megyn Kelly describes, living a life of privilege and access that a simple yet pedestrian soul like me can only dream of. I thought about it. I considered my response. I prayed about it. Westy can $&”% a bag of @&$@ too. I may end up joining the libs. @The Frankish Reich is a doddering old soul in a sweater vest yammering about case law and precedent. @Trump_is_Mentally_fit has been said by someone to have a lazy eye and clearly he’s a 4 floor guy with stairs only reached the 2nd story. @Roundybout rolls about with a big old Charlie Brown head. I’m probably a 9 in that group of 2’s and 3’s. I like my odds.

Righto. It’s my gift and my curse. Offputting and yet oddly appealing to roughy 13-18% of the population. I think I just happen to run into the 82%-87% fairly often? This didn’t load for me the other day when I sent the original note. Fair response in the calm light of day.

Thank you for trying to make me feel better. As a homely yet ultimately lovable man, I’ve come to grips with meangirlitis of people like @ComradeKayAdams and keep it in a lock box of sorts to spur me on. Sure, I fire down an extra rack of my favorite cookies now and again to assuage my pain, but 6 days out of 7 I’m doing well for an ugly bugger. As for Megyn K, I kinda like her style. The ‘y’thing may be parental, not really sure and to be blunt, I think she’s a lovely lady but a bit slender. Of course, I fit the category of “older men” as described.

Bad but not bad bad…bad-ish, in the bad family, is/as/of about bad…but not bad bad. So…good, or unbad if you will.

Ah, the old democrat strategy that goes "Yeah, sure, we did stuff like that, but when we did it it was way less done than what you did". The floodgates are open, Frank. Have been since Herr Mueller kicked in doors and busted heads, since 51 intelligence agents spread misinformation designed to impact an election, since one guy was targeted for life in prison while another guy was targeted for kindly old gent of the year for doing the same thing, and worse for a few decades. I can't applaud it, but pretending suddenly this is all a bridge too far is kinda silly.

I think it's a step in the right direction that an anti-Trump voter acknowledges potential dirty tricks by Obama/Biden/Clinton and the dems. It seems silly to rehash the actions of Obama/Biden/Clinton attempts to influence the election, but I've long felt that Trump's Stop the Steal was a direct result of the Dems Illegitimate Election campaign. Following that logic, Biden/Garland's attempt to imprison Trump for life (and the other coordinated efforts to imprison him for, at worst, political dirty tricks) should be followed by Trump's efforts to imprison wrongdoers (criminally) and financially impact those that can be addressed on a civil level.

I'm surprised on the incorrect age assessment. It's just that at times, you present in a fashion similar to some middle aged helicopter parent reaching out to the coach because they noticed little Kayter (beloved only child of Kay and partner Peter) may have suffered over-rotation in right field in sequential innings vis a vis Karl Marx theory of baseball equity and adjudication. As to the rest...sometimes 'be careful on the rocks' really just means what it means. If you prefer I can offer "DANCE AROUND THEM BOULDERS LIKE A DRUNKEN MONKEY--SAFETY EQUIPMENT IS FOR ZIONISTS" . 🕊️

Entirely possible you’re correct on Powell. Maybe the storm is coming, I guess we’ll see. On your planks, no can do, I can’t be impressed with that number. At your age, 40ish as I recall, with your commitment to physical fitness and veganibalism, I’d think you can do 10% more with a bit more commitment and less chit chat about reality tv with the other gals at the gym. I’m guessing of course but I’m usually correct. On the bright side, I put on a few pounds these last few weeks and have some work to do, so while you’re upping your plank game I gotta cut back on the sweets. Everybody wins. Be careful on the rocks.

To quote Chi…”they’re not exactly shy about it.”

I know it’s too much to ask to hope he would move away from this sort of behavior (the declarations on Truth Social), but I wish he would. Political appointees are what they are, and if he wanted her gone and she serves at his discretion, terminate and move on. I have no doubt that data can or would be manipulated, or that people in government would cook the books for any number of reasons. Announce a change, terminate the appointee and move on. He’ll be criticized either way, but at the end of the day, she’s a Biden holdover.

B, I’ve always trusted you, and I think you know that. I’ve been a fan of your posts, appreciate the work you put in, but this post… All the features Megyn Kelly mentions that relate to good looking people…I have none. Zero. I got close set eyes, my nose is wide, my lips pencil thin. I do not have blonde hair. I’m basically fugly, but was blissfully unaware until now. I mean I had questions. I heard the whispers. I heard the laughter. I had stuff thrown at me by passing cars. I knew on some level Comrade Kay wasn’t always wrong. I guess I just was kidding myself. Anyway, here’s an idea, you killer of dreams, you breaker of hearts—-why don’t you and your stupid *&$#ing bestie Megyn *&$§ing Kelly go $&*# yourselves and your &$%+ing blue-eyed $#&*ing soul draining &$#@ing monotonous bull&$#@ing bull$#@&? How about that?

It happens Tibsy. In a perfect world everyone is above board and willing to tell the story truthfully, but the world is imperfect. Would you rather the secrets stay in the darkness or she sheds some light on wrongdoers?

There's always the potential for disappointment or an outcome not befitting your worldview. We've seen it time and again---Russia collusion, Mueller, AG Wm Barr, Classified data Clinton, Classified data Trump, Classified data Biden, Jack Smith good/Jack Smith bad, Fanny Willis corrupt/Fanny Willis savior, Alvin Bragg and novel reinvention of laws and justice. Some people are happy, some sad but someone is always something. In this case---it's actually a net positive for the country if she has nothing to offer about the current President---that would be 100% consistent with what we know/have known for quite some time. At the end of the day, I'm going to ask you to stay tuned in, stay turned on, and keep your head on a swivel. The action may be fast, it may be furious--but stay engaged and keep your chin up.

Everyday it seems we're getting closer to the testimony. Should be pretty juicy, or not.

Just look at how you phrase all this, Andy1. "Corporate Republicans...cheap labor" and "Dems getting new voters". So...no cheap labor exploited by the Dems? No Corporate Dems? No well-healed dems working the system? "Trump exploited"? Illegal immigration has been a hot button issue for decades, and he less 'exploited' than came up with a plan to address a long simmering problem. If any politician in recent memory exploited anything, it was the Biden Free Pass crowd. That resonated with voters as we saw the typical lefty cities--long on demanding open borders and pointing to how great it was for everybody---roll up into a ball 15 minutes after they were asked to feed/shelter/house a couple bus loads of people looking for a better life. Unionization is one solution, but not the only one. Offer jobs/benefits at a reasonable rate, said rate to be determined by the ability to find workers to do the work. Liberals are going to have to pay more, probably, but consider the deep discount all these years with the exploitation of low wages for people flying under the radar.

It's ironic that the liberals who called for heads on a stick due to fabricated tales of Russian interference impacting our elections have now taken the position that democrats fabricating tales of Russian interference is irrelevant when it directly impacts the integrity of our elections. And, that they seem hyper-fixated on criminal wrongdoing by Epstein after having one of the most widely acknowledged predators on the planet (and Epstein pal WJC) stumping for their most recent candidate as the sun set on the me2 movement. Let's push forward on this criminal investigation and see where it takes us, for the greater good.

I disagree on Powell--if Trump is correct that the Fed should lower rates, the rates should be lowered. Powell digging in because his feelings are internally misaligned reveals he likely should not be the fed chairman to begin with, which is probably why he hasn't adjusted the rates.

This is true of course, all of it. When we consider the plight of the modern liberal, it's virtually always the same--someone else has to do the heavy lifting. Government has to compel them before they do more for the greater good. Someone else has to work the fields to make their lives easier. Someone else has shoulder the debt they incurred for higher education.

We'll miss you!

You really have to hand it to HRC--in spite of years of embarrassment at the hands of her husband, the deaths under mysterious circumstances of some friends and associates, vast right wing conspiracies, bimbo eruptions, the apparent spontaneous and occasional loss of the use of her arms and legs while on the campaign trail, the heartache that comes with being labelled as careless and reckless with national secrets by her friends, and everything else she dealt with, she always managed to position herself as an utterly unlikable and completely unsympathetic figure.

Hmm. Interesting...maybe we see some fireworks yet.