RkFast

Continue to keep projecting and putting words in my mouth, you !@#$ing inbred.

Not to Godwin the thread...ok, I DO want to Godwin it, but try telling the Jews what happenned in the past "means nothing." History has no significance and lends no perspective, huh? And I like your argument style...dont post facts of you own....instead change the statement people made to something else, and argue against THAT. Youre BEYOND "idiot."

Oh no? Unions dont use us vs. them rhetoric? Go look up some of Trumka's quotes? Whats a strike, but the ULTIMATE strong-arm tactic? Give us what we want or we will mount a massive bad PR casmpaign against you." And Im sure when I was a kid and my pop got a new job, the nightly calls from the union bosses imploring him to join the union or else were just nice calls. I dont insinuate they are thugs. I outright say it. And Ive used those little things called FACTS AND EXAMPLES to prove my point. Try it sometime. Its called perspective you dummy. Look up the meaning. Heres you answer...I refuse to be told to "tone it down" by the same cretins who made a cottage industry out of tearing down the last Republican president. And like I said...using that stupid little thing called history to provide perspective, the "rhetoric" out there today is outright mild.

I didnt say YOU said that. but thats what they are.

Im loving the fact that the guy who is a total tool of labor unions, the ULTIMATE "us vs. them" thugocracy is lecturing people on "tone" and "discourse" and how we carry ourselves.

Now Palin's use of the term "blood libel" is stirring "controversy." And of course....shes being blasted for "not writing that piece." becuase yuou know...politicos never have other people write their speeches.

What "political gain" has the right obtained by conjuring up 9/11? To be honest, I was expecting something far more shrill from Palin. But damn...that was pretty good. I didnt know she had it in her.

WHERE YOU LIVE that might be true. Where I live, it isnt true. Like I said, Im doing OK, and Im not even making 250. But if I was, Id STILL not be "rich." Upper Middle class, at best. Certainly not "wealthy."

Not for nothing, but could it be a ton of peope are REALLY pissed off becuase some political novice and his merry band of children declared they are going to "change" the Country in a way those people want no part of? Hey Barry and you libs...you want a pice of everything I own and to control everything in my life and youre SHOCKED Im pissed off about that? Really?

You mean Fred Phelps is "just crazy" and there is nothing you can do about people like that? How come Loughner isnt "just crazy"? 'splain

!@#$ you, scumbag. Im not the one defiling anything. Its you....you and your sick pathetic losers who are using this tragedy and her death for political gain. Two hours. TWO !@#$ING HOURS after she died....with the Congresswoman still in surgery...was all it took for some leftards to start making this a political issue for your their own gain. Meanwhile, some shitbag murders a ton of people in Fort Hood screaming Alluah Akbar and the SAME Krugman and the limpdicks like you lecture everyone on tolerance and "not rushing to judgment." So go !@#$ yourself. "Oh, Im just getting warmed up..."

And you see no difference between "mentioning" an event to forward an agenda related to it, like a homeland security bill....and using an event as the focal point of a political campaign thats got NOTHING to do with the event? Youre lost. And again.....a right winger cant get out the word "9" in "9/11" before the leftards go BATCHITT. Meanwhile, that kids body wasnt cold before the left CERTIFIED "the right's rhetoric" as the cause of this. Stunking, no good pathetic hypocrites. Whens the keg party where you drink beer out of her nine year old skull, you !@#$ing cretins?

bull ****. Utter bull ****. The last time 9/11/01 was discussed and analyized and run through the political coals like "right wing talking points" are right now.....was on 9/12/01. Try to keep up....where has 9/11 been used by the right as a central pillar to try and gain political advantage? And even if fyou two nimrods CAN find examples, Ill follow up with examples of the left demonizing and condemning them for it. So either way, I win. The point is MADE that the left are practicing a level of hypocrisy right now that is unprecedented.

Really? When? When has the right used 9/11 to get an upper hand on their political opponents like this?

He ALSO opposed Iraq, Afghanistan Wars and detests Christianity. Who is spreading THAT load of crap in our society?. I sincerely hope you libs, using this for policial game, dont get any red wine on the body of Christina Green, you pathetic POSes.

Dont dodge...... Does Palin's website have any more influence to the right as Daily Kos, a sight where Markos Maloutisas said Rep. Giffords' should be "targeted" for her blue dog ways, have on the left?

Does Palin's website have any more influence to the right as Daily Kos, a sight where Markos Maloutisas said Rep. Giffords' should be "targeted" for her blue dog ways, have on the left? Weak. Sarah Palin is no more of a "leader" nor have more influence than any of the famous people listed on Malkin's page. Shes not in public office. She's nothing more than a pundit on TV and does public speaking for candidates.

I will post it again...... http://michellemalkin.com/2011/01/10/the-progressive-climate-of-hate-an-illustrated-primer-2000-2010/

Il post it again, because she so uttery NAILS it: http://michellemalkin.com/2011/01/10/the-progressive-climate-of-hate-an-illustrated-primer-2000-2010/ SE Cupp follows up the rim shot and slams it home: http://www.nydailynews.com/opinions/2011/01/10/2011-01-10_sarah_palin_is_not_to_blame_for_shooting_of_gabrielle_giffords_leftwing_rhetoric.html

Michelle Malkin calls out the left on their utter bull **** hypocrisy on this issue: http://michellemalkin.com/2011/01/10/the-progressive-climate-of-hate-an-illustrated-primer-2000-2010/

He did last night on Geraldo's show on Fox. He DIRECTLY called out Palin and Beck BY NAME.

Im calling bull **** on this. There are MILLIONS of people out there that have absolutely ZERO "hand" or interest in ANYTHING political.

I have to ask...If Fox News and Rush Limbaugh are going to turn me into a killer, does that mean Keith Olbermann and MSNBC are going to turn me into a pansy?

My point is that those who attempt to say this is part of a "new phenomenon" are completely full of **** and ignorant of the history of political discourse and commentary in this Country. ****, 150 years ago, Limbaugh would be considered a lightweight.

...how come every coupla hours I see a former Bill in the PLAYOFFS making HUGE plays and scoring touchdowns?