Agreed on all accounts. (except I wasn't a Bledsoe apologist )
On the point I quoted, I think that people want a can't miss lock QB of the future. If you think about it, we haven't had one since Jim's rookie year. It's been like a rotating door of busts, pretenders and journymen since. That is why people are hardcore for Losman being in there, they want to see if he is "that" QB.
Let's face it, if we go 8-8 and miss the playoffs by loss, in week 17, this was a BAD move. It just opens up the same line of questions, maybe even more, then we had going into this season. Then what, we can give JP 6 more games next season, be 2-4 and have the same thing happen? How is he going to mature, and get better without playing time?
I watched Eli Manning play last season, almost every game. I couldn't believe how terrible he looked, and wondered how someone who looked that bad could have been a first round pick. I thought he was going to be a complete bust, he couldn't even throw a spiral at times, let alone be accurate. Now look at him, he did a complete 180 and looks like 10 times the QB he was last year. Jim Gray asked him if that time helped him, even though he struggled so badly. Eli said the experience was huge, and nothing practice could have 100% prepared him for.
Not that I disagree with KH being in there, I just hope the worst possible scenario doesn't happen, like many others I assume. Maybe I'm in the minority, but 5-11 with JP, is better then 7-9 or 8-8 with Holcomb. At least with JP, we'll have a better idea if we have "our" QB.
Sorry if this is confusing, sounding incoherent is a gene I had passed down by my family.