-
Posts
8,134 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by ndirish1978
-
-
Any draft that has Tannenhill falling to the second has big problems
-
Buddy Nix has been pretty clear that he isn't trading up.
I don't understand the trade up threads. The Buffalo Bills will not be trading up. Now, or as long as Nix is here.
-
What this means for the Bills: say goodbye to any dreams of Vincent Jackson. The Skins have a ton of cap space and they are going after every OL and WR they want.
-
Per ESPN
The contract includes $20.5 million in guarantees and $40.5 million in "new" money, bringing his total over five years to $58.25 million, . He can make an additional $10 million in escalators.
Sanchez is now the seventh-highest paid NFL quarterback
-
They gave up four unproven draft picks for one...insane
+1 For that price RG3 better be a hall of famer.
-
I put our chances at 0. Chances of landing Mario: 0. Wimbley: highly unlikely.
-
-
I'll amend the statement: you expect difference makers in 1-2, starters in 3. You don't always hit, but you need more hits than misses and we had far more misses than hits. Or are you saying you enjoyed our drafts?
Here are all our draft picks rd 1-3 since 2000 up until Chix. You tell me which year you really like. In 9 years we hit on more than one pick TWICE in 2001 and 2009.
2000 1- Erik Flowers 2-Tavares Tillman, 3-Corey Moore
2001 1- Nate Clements 2- Aaron Schobel 3- Travis Henry
2002 1- Mike Williams 2- Josh Reed 2- Ryan Denney 3- Coy Wire
2003 1- Willis McGahee 2- Chris Kelsay 3- Angelo Crowell
2004 1- Lee Evans 1- JP Losman 3- Tim Anderson
2005 2- Roscoe Parrish 3- Kevin Everett
2006 1- Whitner 2- McCargo 3- Youboty
2007 1- Lynch 2- Pos 3- Trent Edwards
2008 1- McKelvin 2- Hardy 3- Ellis
2009 1- Maybin 2- Wood 3- Byrd
-
We'll never get Mario, so: Mincey, VJax, Garcon, Carlson
-
How would you guys feel if the latest batch of mocks hold true and we draft Coples?
-
-
Oh I know. I'm not complaining. I just identified in myself the reason why I have subconsciously been skeptical about our chances of drafting an impact DLman.
-
Probably our starting SLB unless something dramatic happens. Glad he re-signed
-
There are a bunch of names floating around for us at 10 and I keep wincing when they mention us going DL. I realized the reason we're all so gun-shy about drafting a DL early this year is our historical futility picking DL early. There are too many question marks for me to feel confident taking a DE. Upshaw- he looked terrible at the combine. Coples- has issues with effort and was a bit of a one year wonder. We're so used to missing on DL picks that everyone is scared to pick a guy early. We've generally done such a poor job in the draft and that's why we're the team wit the longest playoff drought in the NFL.
DL drafted in the 1st
09- Maybin- Bust who picked up some stats with the Jets.
06- McCargo- Terrible
00- Erik Flowers- Benched after 5 games in yr 2 and then cut.
how about 2-3?
01- Schobel (2) The best of the bunch. Great player. Our ONE hit
01- Ron Edwards (3) Average, we didn't hold on to him
02- Ryan Denney (2) Average player. Had a couple of decent seasons.
03- Chris Kelsay (2) Stats are comparable to Denney's, but somehow scored a big contract and has stayed with the team.
04- Tim Anderson (3) 52 tackles in 5 years. Lasted 1 year in the NFL post-Bills.
08- Chris Ellis (3) Brought in to rush the passer, 1 sack in 3 seasons.
10- Troup (2) ??
10- Carrington (3) ??
I have reserved judgement on Troup and Carrington. When you draft someone in the top 3, you're looking for a difference-maker. We have hit on exactly 1 good pick out of 11 and secured 2 decent role players. That leaves us with 8 complete misses in the first 3 rounds. You build along the lines. We were able to turn our OL drafting around when we picked up Levitre and Wood in 09. I really hope we turn this around soon. I hope this year's draft is a lot closer to our '11 draft than '10 and we pick up at least 2 good DLmen.
-
Maybe if he played DE. He has played LB every year of his career.
Including 4-3 SLB for the last 2 years after being a JLB in the 3-4.
We would sign him still I think. But as a SLB!!
Barnett Sheppard Wimbley.
At least be knowledge about the players you think you want.
Here is the knowledge I be about the player I want. Also, the knowledge I be about the coaching system, you grammatical genius.
Wimbley came out of college weighing about 25lbs less than he does now, so they shifted him to LB, where he has gone on to bulk up. 6'4 260 is the prototypical size for a DE that Nix wants and he is a natural pass rusher who would no longer have to worry about ever having to drop in coverage. 4-3 linebackers are supposed to be smaller than 3-4 LBs because their job is not rushing the passer, but covering and run stuffing. Cowher has stated he wants smaller, fast LBs. Wimbley is a DE in our scheme, just like Merriman is a DE in our scheme. Keep your smug answers to yourself and don't interrupt when grown-ups are talking.
-
"cool" to play here?
what does that even mean.
It's pretty simple, not a place that gets made fun off being bass ackwards. When you have players making jokes about Buffalo (long list), reporters making jokes about Buffalo (Peyton to Buffalo:LOL), it gives the town an air of not being a good place to play, even if it's not true. Perception means a lot to people whether you credit that statement as accurate or not. Miami sucks, but the town is a vacation spot, so player would consider signing off of that alone. Buffalo needs to create a player-friendly culture. Not in easy workouts or anything, but being known as a good place to live and supportive of the players.
-
Wow. I like SJ. Hope his recruiting pays off. I wonder if it's a pipe dream to also hope for VJ and Mario Williams.
That would be too good to believe. Imagine having those positions stored up, allowing us to focus on O line, linebacker and depth at the draft!
We could even draft Tannehill if we got WR and DE playmakers in FA.
I'll be happy, though, with just one big FA signing at WR or DE.
It is.
-
Sure, but it all starts with a new owner.
Unfortunately, that's a big part of it. Old-timers like Wilson don't appreciate the need to create an attractive atmosphere for players to come in to. The team facilities are not that great and the stadium really needs some work too. He is a bit too old to understand that players do sign to play in places with a bit more glitz that coddle them. He's used to the days of lunch-pail players who just come in to work to get a job done. Indianapolis is not really a much better city than Buffalo, but they have a sick stadium and that in itself makes them relevant even after their winning days. Mark Cuban really changed the culture when he bought his NBA team by installing a luxury locker room, having catered meals after games (I know the catering is ridiculous for an NFL team, I'm talking about the sentiment) and basically treating his players better than other places in the league. That in itself brings in FA signees. It's really not Wilson's fault. He's older than dirt and he is simply too disconnected from 20-30 year olds to understand what makes them happy.I really don't think he's even aware of the exasperation his fan base feels for him.
-
Is there a reason Michael Floyd isn't on this list?
-
I love the sudden appropriation of the term "mafia." Even Scott Chandler's wife is hashtagging it!
"Best birthday gift ever! @scottchandler84 signing his contract with Buffalo! So proud of my hubby! #BillsMafia http://pic.twitter.com/iGFdqKp3"
Can someone remind me when this started?
-
The problem is: The Bills do not start 0-0. They start 0-4. They average more than 4 losses just in their own division in the last 10 years. If you sat through Billy Joe Hobert and Rob Johnson, you'd understand. I admire your optimism, but the Bills have killed mine.
Prove it and I'm right there with you. And tht whole unconditional thing is what got a whole bunch of people wealthy beyond belief. I'm chosing my own wealth.
Dude, someone needs to give you a hug or something. You should change your screen name to Eeyore.
-
He's pretty much exactly what Nix said he wants in a DE. I would be so happy if we could pick him up. But PFt says "Wimbley would be a highly valued commodity around the NFL and can expect a first-year payment from his next team that dwarfs the $11 million Oakland would have paid him." I though Mario would be getting 13-14? How expensive is it going to be to sign a good DE?
-
Locker room morale should be pretty solid heading into training camp. Taking care of your own is HUGE.
I totally agree with this. It has to have been difficult year in and out, knowing that by playing well, players were in essence playing themselves out of a locker room because the team wouldn't spend the $ to extend most players. A happy locker room has to be a major part of luring free agents.Not to mention improving the overall team play.
-
We're actually keeping the people who produce for us? Is it just me, or does it seem surreal? I'm not being sarcastic either. Deep down, I was thinking we'd re-sign Stevie and most everyone else would walk. I think the FO is starting to change their losing culture!
If history is any indicator (it is)
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
Wow, I'm surprised by how little I agree with you, since your points are all well thought out.
1- I don't think we go OL in the 1st.
2- I do think we lose Bell
3- I agree we will not get Jackson or Williams
4- Wimbley would be a full time DE, not OLB
5- If we don't sign a good on in FA, we draft WR in the 1st.