Jump to content

Coach Tuesday

Community Member
  • Posts

    17,719
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Coach Tuesday

  1. 59 minutes ago, MAJBobby said:

     


    This play encapsulates what a knucklehead he is.  Notice he gets open, gets the ball, then slides down without being touched.  He’s a weird guy on and off the field.  Has some Robert Royal to his game - he’ll get wide open then let the ball bounce off his his facemask 20 yards into the air. 
     

    This guy is a true clown show.

    • Haha (+1) 1
  2. 33 minutes ago, DJB said:

    Remember when we traded  Wyatt for a late pick? How did that turn out?

     

    Not saying Bates is the next Wyatt but man it’s rough to see decent oline guys go


    Not the year to be a hoarder.  

    • Dislike 1
  3. 8 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

     

    My honest opinion? This is one of the weakest highlight videos I've ever seen for a supposedly 1st round talent.

     

    First of all nearly half the video is punt returns. Not a good sign when you have to fill time in a highlight video with plays that will be irrelevant when he hits the NFL (unless you are drafting a punt returner in the 1st round).

     

    More importantly every single pass catching highlight is the same. He catches the ball in open space and then zips by the defense at lightning speed. Where are the routes? Where is the shiftiness with the ball in his hands? Where are the catches outside of his frame? Can he find holes in zone? A couple times in these highlights he catches a vertical pass that is a tiny bit out in front of him and he falls to the ground while securing the catch, like a simple soft catch knocked him over.

     

    This looks like a mid-round pick to me. For him to be successful the play has to be set up specifically for him to receive the ball in space because he isn't going to set plays up on his own. The pass will have to be perfect and he'll have to hope the defense takes a bunch of bad angles. I don't see any shiftiness on his tape at all. He actually gets caught from behind more than a couple of times because he doesn't understand how to force bad angles. He's the definition of a straight line player.

     

    If any team takes Worthy in the 1st round it will end as badly as John Ross IMO.


    Sounds like an Al Davis pick.  When they hit, they hit big - but the misses were notable too.

    • Like (+1) 1
  4. 12 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

     

     

    I think the Cover 1 people have given some fans the impression that re-structuring contracts doesn't ALWAYS come at the expense of the future cap by implying that the Bills cap situation is just naturally going to get better.   

     

    The Bills will have to work and make some tough decisions to make it better.    They weren't very forthright about that.   Thompsett knows better but as anyone who saw that video knows,  they are a very sentimental group.       

     

    I'm not interested in guaranteeing Morse base salary by distributing it over void years and missing that opportunity to save $8M asap and move on.............Nor am I interested in doing extensions for Morse or Bates.   Ideally neither is on the roster by 2025 so I don't want to have another $10M+ in dead cap tied up in them in 2025.

     

    I'm done with running it back with all of these guys that were 6-5 at midseason 2 of the past 3 seasons and looked tired in the playoffs in each of the past 3.

     

    Time for a re-tool.   And a good draft year to have playing time opportunities available instead of all being blocked by over-priced vets.

     


    I keep thinking about how fun it would be to find like 3 young WRs, rookies or younger FAs, who can come in as a group and develop together with Josh for the next 3-5 years.  Sort of like what the Packers have done.  Find some cheap, fast talent on offense and let them grow together.

    • Like (+1) 2
    • Agree 3
  5. 4 minutes ago, Patrick Fitzryan said:

    What statistics were wrong? Amazing how the "true" story of Tulsa didn't come out until two years ago, but we're supposed to believe the new version without questioning why we never heard it.

     

    Lies are being told about cases that happened in modern day ("Breonna Taylor was shot in bed!"), but somehow revisionist history from an event 100 years ago is gospel? Okay.


    I guess in addition to being inherently more violent, Black people are also inherently better at P.R.?  

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Haha (+1) 1
  6. 3 minutes ago, Patrick Fitzryan said:

    It's pretty important to mention that for all the talk of me being a racist, no one has actually called me wrong or disputed any of those statisitcs.

     

    2 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

     

    So you have completely misinterpreted what happened. I'm going to assume you're making a good-faith effort to do so and respond accordingly. It doesn't matter that 10 white people were killed at the offset. Some white men of the city were attempting to hunt down and lynch a black man off of nothing more than an accusation. Some black men armed themselves and defended the man that was accused, and yes they used guns to do so. That's the point of the 2nd amendment. They used their rights to protect themselves from unjust violence.

     

    If you remove race from the scenario you'd probably wholeheartedly agree with their actions, yes? A man is accused of a crime but not put on trial or any investigation whatsoever. An angry mob gathers together to kill that man. Another group gathers together and uses their 2nd amendment rights to defend that man from the angry mob. At what point in this scenario are you finding fault with the actions of the defenders? Because I suspect you will have to abandon some other aspect of your political leanings to find any fault there.

     

    Anyways it doesn't matter how it started. What matters is that a violent rampage ensued which led to the death of many innocent people, mostly black residents, and the destruction of many homes and businesses. Your statement is akin to saying "9/11 happened because of American military actions in the Middle East" which may be true but also removes exactly zero fault from the perpetrators.

     

    You should also know that your comments about the Tulsa massacre are throwing into question everything you're saying about modern problems and solutions. But like I said I am going to assume you're making a good-faith effort to understand these issues so I wanted to start by addressing misconceptions you have about century-old history first.

     

    Just now, Brand J said:

    I’ve called you wrong multiple times. I realize you’re a waste of time though and won’t try to educate you any further.

     

  7. 1 minute ago, Brand J said:

    Yeah he’s racist. I didn’t want to believe it before, just thought he was ignorant, but the way he’s twisting everything to paint Black folks as the villains, it’s undeniable. I mean, we’re talking about Tulsa in the 1920s and he’s claiming how Whites were afraid of their lives because of violent Blacks 😂 He also continues to claim “only 5 stores were destroyed,” omitting the fact that Black folks were dragged out of their homes and their houses set on fire. Their ENTIRE section of that city was destroyed! Airplanes dropped bombs on Greenwood for crying out loud. I’m sure he believes Emmitt Till deserved what he got for whistling at a white woman. 


    He’s “just quoting facts and statistics.”  

  8. 2 minutes ago, Patrick Fitzryan said:

    Say what? That in a world where white men are blamed for everything under the sun, it's ridiculous that certain groups are completely immune to any criticism?


    Getting closer… at least we’ve surfaced the “persecuted white man”…

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Vomit 1
    • Agree 1
    • Awesome! (+1) 2
  9. 29 minutes ago, Bill from NYC said:

    Does anyone else think that this thread has gone far enough?


    I do.  It should’ve been shut down when Cotton showed up and started telling us that Black people are just inherently violent, hey, he’s just quoting facts here that the leftist media doesn’t want to admit.  

    • Like (+1) 2
    • Agree 1
  10. 1 minute ago, Patrick Fitzryan said:

    Yeah, I think they were more concerned about another black-on-white violent crime -- something that happens way more often than the opposite despite there being 5X as many whites -- than trying to annihilate one tiny block that had a confectionery, donut shop, beauty salon, and cigar store.

     

    As for your "little to no evidence" claim, that is complete conjecture based in bias. The facts on these stories always get twisted to fit agendas.


    JUST SAY IT, DUDE

  11. Just now, Patrick Fitzryan said:

    I know exactly what your views are. Calling people "racist" for citing factual evidence, complaining about "fascist Christian fundamentalism"...you're on the far left, and the main tenet of your religion is repudiating reality so that you don't have to deal with uncomfortable truths, all while being consistently hypocritical and sanctimonious.

     

    Some people choose to not live their entire life lying to themselves. Deal with it.


    I am so far from being on the “far left” Cotton…

  12. Just now, Patrick Fitzryan said:

    LMAO, the same people (you and your ilk) who want more gun control are also the exact same people who think that the group responsible for the overwhelming majority of gun violence in this country should be treated with much more leniency by the justice system. No bail, endless "2nd" chances, lighter sentencing, etc. You don't want accountability for anything.


    You don’t know what my ilk are - you don’t know my views on any of this other than that you, Cotton F. (I assume), are a racist.  Which is clear.  You don’t like Black people, just say it, you’ll feel better.  

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Agree 1
    • Dislike 1
  13. First we were assured upthread that this was a product of mental illness run rampant.

     

    Now we’re being told it’s due to the inherent violence of Black men.

     

    One poster is telling everyone that only Jesus can fix this (although, inconsistently, apparently Jesus needs the help of some kind of fascist state committed to fundamentalist Christian values per the same poster).

     

    The cause is always some “other.”

     

    Never about us, our own accountability, our insane gun addiction as a society, among other structural dysfunctions.

     

    Personal accountability is MIA in this country.  So much easier to blame other people for anything and everything.

    • Like (+1) 2
    • Awesome! (+1) 2
    • Thank you (+1) 1
  14. 3 minutes ago, Ya Digg? said:

    The Cowboys and Vikings say hi 


    Not even close.  Trading the greatest QB of his generation to your conference rival - when you also needed a QB - blows the Walker trade away in terms of stupidity.

    Just now, Gregg said:

    Mahomes would have zero Super Bowl championships and zero Super Bowl appearances if he were drafted by the Bills. Allen isn't the reason the Bills can't get to the Super Bowl. McDermott isn't in the same league as Reid as far as head coaches go. The Bills defense gets destroyed in big spots against good offenses with good/great QB's. The Chiefs defense can step up in big moments. They prove it time and time again.


    Horrible take.

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Disagree 3
    • Agree 2
  15. 4 minutes ago, BuffaloBillyG said:

    So, McD should be fired for trading the Mahomes pick even though Mahomes wouldn't have been as good in Buffalo as he is in KC. 

     

    I'm betting if that scenario played out your stance would be that McDermott should be fired because his handpicked QB in Mahomes wasn't progressing as quickly as that Josh Allen guy in Kansas City that keeps winning Super Bowls and he should have waited a year for the QB.


    Of all the BS takes on this forum, the “Mahomes wouldn’t be a winner in Buffalo” is probably the worst.  An unprovable, baseless take.  Just so sick of seeing it.

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Agree 7
  16. 45 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

     

    Do it Jerry.   The entertainment value would be great.  Meatball McCarthy and Rex.   Could've been the HC matchup in SB XLV if the Jets didn't come out flat after the win in NE in the divisional round.


    A lot of their DC interviews so far seem like interim HC candidates.  

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Haha (+1) 2
×
×
  • Create New...